Lancaster man sentenced in firebombing case | The Columbus Disp...

Judged:

1

1

alchemy wrote:

He's my hero. She probably lied to have the kids taken. They always do. Its bad enough that enforcement officials of all types are liars and its standard to lie on reports to accomplish what they want but when government officials lie when juveniles are involved that should be a capital crime as far as Im concerned.

alchemy wrote:

He's my hero. She probably lied to have the kids taken. They always do. Its bad enough that enforcement officials of all types are liars and its standard to lie on reports to accomplish what they want but when government officials lie when juveniles are involved that should be a capital crime as far as Im concerned.

Go figure wrote:

<quoted text>If you consider Guy Luttrell your hero then I'm not sure what planet your on. I can't seem to see where your getting the idea that the social worker is responsible for the removal of Ms. Casto's child. Since there are checks and balances in the Social Service Department, I could be safe in saying the removal of the child was due to the "fine" parenting skills of the parents. This might be the fact since ms. Casto is currently serving time for a drug charge, not exactly what the PTA calls a fundraiser. I can assume from the tone of your comment that you have had contact with Social Services eithr as a parent or a child. why is it that when people who are in no position to have children, seem to have them, and then call on the Government to support them. These same "parents" think they are the best parents around and only they seem to know how to raise their offspring, often raising another generation of under educated, under motivated kids that think that having sex and a child makes them an adult. Maybe if some of these unwed parents would look at the big picture, like how are they going to afford to raise a child on their own for the next 18 years, then maybe the amount of unprotected sex will go down. This might reduce the amount of Social Workers that you feel are lying and taking the perfect children from their perfect parents.

alchemy wrote:

<quoted text>
How bout its none of your Fing business? Sorry but I have little patience for anyone who thinks children should be raised to government standards or what Mrs Clever down the road thinks! Checks and balances? There is no exemption in right and wrong for anyone "just doing their job" and they deserve the consequences. I just wish there were more and more often.

kay wrote:

I personally know both Brandon and Tara.
I believe there is more to the story than is being told in the news.
I also believe that Children's Services in Fairfield County needs a total house cleaning. I know for a fact that the case workers there will lie to cover thier butts.
I know that that Brandon and Tara are not ideal parents but then neither is the woman that is now raising thier children. If she were then both of her daughters would not be drug addicts. The kids mean a check to the woman raising her grandchildren.
Children's Services lied to Brandon and Tara by telling them if they went to rehab and cleaned up they would give the kids back and then never followed through when they did clean up. Both had repeated clean drug tests and did everything they were told by Children's services but they still couldn't get the kids.
Why should anyone believe Children's services? It takes very little to lose your kids in this county and almost takes an act of God to get them back.

kay wrote:

I personally know both Brandon and Tara.
I believe there is more to the story than is being told in the news.
I also believe that Children's Services in Fairfield County needs a total house cleaning. I know for a fact that the case workers there will lie to cover thier butts.
I know that that Brandon and Tara are not ideal parents but then neither is the woman that is now raising thier children. If she were then both of her daughters would not be drug addicts. The kids mean a check to the woman raising her grandchildren.
Children's Services lied to Brandon and Tara by telling them if they went to rehab and cleaned up they would give the kids back and then never followed through when they did clean up. Both had repeated clean drug tests and did everything they were told by Children's services but they still couldn't get the kids.
Why should anyone believe Children's services? It takes very little to lose your kids in this county and almost takes an act of God to get them back.

Go figure wrote:

<quoted text> I guess it becomes my business when tax money is involved. The tax money that is used to monitor the "superior" parenting skills of Ms. Casto, the tax money used to support these children , now that they are not with Ms. Casto, and finally the tax money that is used to house and feed Ms. Casto. The government standards you are so against are there to insure that these children are raised at least to a minimum standard of child care. As far as your comment to Mrs. Cleaver down the road, I find it ammusing since I too was raised in Lancaster. I joking refer to my upbringing as being raised by Ward and June Cleaver, in that I had both parents and an extended family in town. I knew that if I did anything I should not have, I knew the truth was at home waiting for me, because someone would let someone in the family know and I paid the consequences for my actions. I sorry you feel that children are property that should not be tought right from wrong, not have to live up to community standards, and poor parenting skills should not be noticed by the community. I'm sure that Ms. Casto and others like her had no problem going to Job and Family Services, "Welfare", to get financial support to live the lifestyle that they chose. Sure, no Government control on your lack in raising children, but oh that money is what they deserve, you can't have it both ways. Maybe if Ms. Casto had not had decided to have a child and not decided to do drugs, then maybe her life would be different now. Maybe Ms. Casto needed to be raised by Ward and June Cleaver, then maybe she would not be in the situation she is now.

alchemy wrote:

<quoted text>
Ward and June cleaver are satanic, go figure. Sounds funny huh, but theyre whole style is based on masonic-luciferean ideals which americans believe to the very depths of their souls is goodness. When you figure that out then maybe you will be on track but being raised by them gives you life sentence against truth but right now you are 180 dgrees off, exactly backwards. You must at least see that you are 180 degress opposite of what I say? If you have 100 kids raised in antiestablishment, dysfunctional and 98 become criminals but 2 learn and hold fast to the truth that thw whole world rejects then its worth it because the whole world and the 98 are irrelevent and inanimate. Raising kids to believe in american ideals is an eternal death sentence. Sure theyll be happy here but this is satans kingdom. "Satan is the God of this world"