Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
You should talk ... You and your queer friends are stuck on stupid.

No moron, "stuck on stupid" is a grown man that thinks that penguins can fly.

Carry on Penguin Boy.

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>I read your spill on why you are here, damn you are stupid damn you are stupid....that seems to be your best argument. The fact is that basically like dan, it's just for fun. Now the truth comes out.

Are you under the impression that the truth was trying to be hidden?

Look everyone!! Ritardo Riccardo has uncovered the truth, the truth that everyone one other than himself already knew!!!! Wow. You should think about being a private detective Ricky.

It's like watching the village idiot begin to laugh our of no where because he finally got the punch line to a joke he heard three weeks ago.

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
No moron, "stuck on stupid" is a grown man that thinks that penguins can fly.
Carry on Penguin Boy.

Dan thinks cows are full of bullshit.

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
TRANSLATION: KiMare is unable to counter specific points so instead will resort to a character attack.
Typical behavior of lying fundies.

Then Jonah1 writes: "No moron, "stuck on stupid" is a grown man that thinks that penguins can fly.

Carry on Penguin Boy. " LOL...are you talking about yourself J1?

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
So now it is okay to talk about 'it'?

You seem to be under the impression that sometimes its ok to discuss other people's sex or to have opinions about it. Quite frankly its a sickness you fundies are obsessed with.

We end up talking about it because of your obsession. But honestly, no, it's not really ever okay to talk about because its none of your f*cking business you busy bodied old coot.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I bet your aunt and uncle feel bad about that, right?

And you "bet" this based upon what information KiMare? What's that? You based it on your own personal prejudices and hopes? Yes, we know. Yet again, a fundie pretending they have insight into other people's emotional states. Tired bullshyt never gets old.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You and your partner, along with every single other gay couple past and present have/will never produce any mutual fruit. See the difference?

The difference is noted, and the complete lack of any sort of relevance concerning the difference is also noted. See how that works jackass? Let us know when the production of mutual fruit is a requirement, won't you dear? LOL!! Until that time, your repeated harping on it just shows everyone how desperate you are for any type of reason to validate your existing prejudices.

Hey, btw, how you coming along on producing some research that confirms your claim that adoptive fathers are more dangerous than non-adoptive fathers, and that they work less then non-adoptive fathers? Remember these "evolutionary facts" you spewed out? We're still waiting for you to present some credible information to back those claims. Will you be presenting that anytime soon?

Stand back everyone and watch the spinning begin!

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't produce it, eh Dan?
Perhaps you could refer us to a post where I was against gay marriage then? I'll wait. Thanks.

Whatever game player.

Funny how it's you claim you're now for gay marriage but all the other posters whom aer actually wanting to see Tom marry Joe don't take a shine to tyou.

Why do you think that is bullshitter?

LOL!!!

What a loser your momma raised.

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
So I take it you support gay porn in class. Way to go pedophile!

Make up whatever lie suits your agenda. It's nothing new.

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Dan thinks cows are full of bullshit.

Err....bullshit comes from cows.

Help?

LOL!!!

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I honestly don't care what you do in your bedroom or elsewhere.

Given how much you bring it up and offer your opinions about it, we would beg to differ on that little lie.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm simply stating reality.

In which post did that occur? I haven't seen you utter anything remotely close to reality. Cite the post number please.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Something I have every right to do so and will continue to do so.

And we have every right to demonstrate with specifics how illogical your statements are, to point out when you blatently lie, and to inform you that your belief that you have a right to offer (or even have) your opinion on other people's sexual activity is very creepy.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You and your partner are not married.

Me and my husband most certainly ARE married. Not a damned thing you can do about it. You can daydream about the sex we have until the cows come home, and we will still be MARRIED the entire time. Legally married. Yup. Unless of course you would like to present some legal prescident that states that your interpretation of your Sky Santa Manual somehow supercedes the jurisdiction of the state of Connecticut. You up for that?

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a flagrant fallacy to say so.

Nope, sure isn't. You just WISH it were a flagrant fallacy. But it isn't. Chomp on it bitch.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a physical impossibility.

We've already disproven this. Please keep up, we can't keep going back for you slow people. Sex and consummation are not restricted to penis/vaginal intercourse. This is proven using the very source you cited.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a idiotic denial of cultural and religious history.

My marriage doesn't deny any cultural or religious history. Those histories remain in tact. But that is all they are. History. This country is not run or legislated based on historic tradition. Sucks that you think it is.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a distortion of definition that makes the word 'marriage' meaningless.

Bullshyt.

Complete and utter bullshyt.

The "meaning" of the word marriage is a "union", a "ceremony" and an "institution". Those meanings aren't altered one bit based upon the gender make up of the couple entering into one. And the word doesn't magically become meaningless just because the gender make up is different.

But please, don't let facts get in the way. Please, keep posting. There is nothing more hilarious that watching you angrily flap around in your mire of deluded bullshyt!

You can post, and post, and post, and post, and you will NEVER be able to create a rational reason for your prejudices.

Tight Butt Hole wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do the fags push their anal sex & oral sex on everyone? We don't care who or what goes into your anal and oral cavatiy.
So you want everyone to know that you are different than what you feel is the norm. We could care less. Just like a spoiled litte sissy brat that need to throw a fit to get attention.
Shove it up your ass!

Oh look, another fundie obsessed with the butt. Jeebus, given the posts on Topix you would think it is all they think about day in and day out. So creepy.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
At this point, you are losing ALL the credibility you have have on here with this fear.

LOL!!!! Oh, stop it!!! My sides ache!!! YOU, talking about credibiliity!!!! OMGosh, just stop it, I can't stand it!!!! ROTLMFAO!!!!

The person who stated that adoptive fathers work less than non-adoptive fathers wishes to render an opinion about credibility!!!

The person who stated that adoptive fathers are more dangerous than non-adoptive fathers wishes to render an opinion about credibility!!!

The person who stated that sodomy isn't sexual activity wished to discuss credibility!!!!

LOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!! !

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text> Okay stupid. So now because i'm straight, i am dickless? only gays have dicks? what does iut mean? Stupid.

Where exactly did he state that you are dickless because you are straight? Where did he mention that all straight people are dickless?

Oh, that's right....he didn't. But please, don't let facts get in the way of you just making up shyt!!

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Err....bullshit comes from cows.
Help?
LOL!!!

Bullshit comes from bulls.

And Dan. YUK!YUK!YUK!

But never from 532# heifers grazing in Wyoming wheat fields as you had claimed.

thisGuy wrote:

If that's true, then explain what NAMBLA (a homosexual organization) doing with little boys? Care to explain pervert?

Can you employ simple logic?

Here, I will try to help you alleviate a little of your ignorance.
Definitions:
Hoosexual (adj)
1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex
2: of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hom...
Pedophilia (noun)
: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual objec
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ped...

The two are not synonymous, even if they are not mutually exclusive. One who implies that they are synonymous merely illustrates their own ignorance.

It appears you have no valid point, so you prefer to stir the pot with inflammatory rhetoric, which does little more than prove you have nothing of value to say.

Here Is One wrote:

Wrong again.....LOL
31 states to 5..........You are losing miserably..........LOL

Way to go! Hang your hat on patently unconstitutional laws that expressly abridge the rights of US citizens in violation of the 14th Amendment. All this does is to reiterate that you are ignorant of the US Constitution.

Here Is One wrote:

We are gaining votes everyday..........LOL

Actually, you are constitantly losing them. Look at the difference in the popular vote in California between the gay marriage ban in 2000 (Prop 22, which was later struck down by the courts) and 2008 (Prop 8, which similarly was struck down by the courts). There is a marked increase in support for marriage equality, while opposition stagnates. You are living in a fantasy world.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/08/us-...

Here Is One wrote:

Because we don't want you to pervert the name of marriage and that is good enough now back to your closet......LOL

Yeah. Way to prove that you are an unintelligent, ignorant, bigoted, idiot.
Does the 14th Amendment guarantee equal protection of the laws for all persons within a state’s jurisdiction, yes or no?

Here Is One wrote:

Everyone knows that NAMBLA is a gay organization and just because it upsets you does not change the facts......

And the simple fact that it is comprised of pedophiles renders it irrelevant, as pedophilia is illegal in this country. Do you really mean to imply that there is not heterosexual pedophilia, or even to imply that it is not every bit as illegal?

Your arguments regarding pedophilia are irrelevant. Is it reprehensible, amoral, and utterly illegal, regardless of the sexuality of the offender. You see, pedophilia is illegal in every state in the union, so even if same sex marriage were allowed, the existing laws preventing marriage to minors would remain in tact. This argument is really quite inept.

Would you care to make a relevant argument?

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Whatever game player.
Funny how it's you claim you're now for gay marriage but all the other posters whom aer actually wanting to see Tom marry Joe don't take a shine to tyou.
Why do you think that is bullshitter?
LOL!!!
What a loser your momma raised.

Oh look another bullshitting fundie loser is angry with me. YUK!YUK!YUK!

Go to bed Dan, you're staring to slur your spelling. YUK!YUK!YUK!

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Then Jonah1 writes: "No moron, "stuck on stupid" is a grown man that thinks that penguins can fly.
Carry on Penguin Boy. " LOL...are you talking about yourself J1?

You seem to be under the impression that Bruno's post had some specifics that could be addressed. It didn't.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I honestly don't care what you do in your bedroom or elsewhere.
I'm simply stating reality. Something I have every right to do so and will continue to do so.
You and your partner are not married. It is a flagrant fallacy to say so. It is a physical impossibility. It is a idiotic denial of cultural and religious history. It is a distortion of definition that makes the word 'marriage' meaningless.

LOL you still do not get it. Your opinion does not matter all you are saying is what you feel. Not what is right and what is wrong. what is wrong is for you to try and takes away someone rights. Whats is wrong is the way you are close minded. What is wrong is that you were droped on your head as a child. What is wrong is that you have no clue what the hell you are talking about.
P.S
your so called 31 states mean jack amd here is why
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_2...
Oh I love the part in ever article EVER SINGLE 9th Judge did not want to hear the case. I mean really how does that make you feel.

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
You seem to be under the impression that Bruno's post had some specifics that could be addressed. It didn't.

You seem to be under the impression that dan's post have some specifics that could be addressed. They don't.

Chupa Mi Vega wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do the fags push their anal sex & oral sex on everyone? We don't care who or what goes into your anal and oral cavatiy.
So you want everyone to know that you are different than what you feel is the norm. We could care less. Just like a spoiled litte sissy brat that need to throw a fit to get attention.
Shove it up your ass!

Hilarious. You think I'm gay yet you go by a moniker that indicates you're solicting oral sex and close your posts suggesting that people shove something up their asses I've got some very disappointing news for you sweetheart. I am a man. I have never had anything but a thermometer or an endoscope shoved up my ass. Lastly, I've never performed oral sex on a man, nor have I had oral sex performed upon me by a man.

Judging by your need to post pretty much the same thing to multiple posters suggests you're the one throwing the fits. See if mommy won't fix you a nice bowl of tomato soup and a grilled cheese sammich to calm you down a bit.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You really believe therapists don't need therapy?
Think about... Never mind.

Did you really read that much into my post? That you mention going to therapist can mean only one thing, you need therapy. This is true because it is quite evident you're incapable of providing therapy to anyone. Unless they're into abuse.