Who will Fox News choose to run against President Obama

Maladi wrote:

But wait! There's more!
<quoted text>
So he rejects the very thing he says he supports: The Constitution
Here's what he has to say about sexual harassment in the workplace:
<quoted text>
My, my, Mr. Paul. "Why don't they quit once the so-called harassment starts?" Really? REALLY?!
Stance on gay marriage:
<quoted text>
Not only has he flip-flopped on this issue, but he basically expects to take away rights to marriage from those of us who aren't Christian.
Also, he's all for DADT, but originally wasn't for the appeal, but then voted for the appeal. Notice the flip-flopping trend here?
He was the one who introduced the "Sanctity of Life Act" which defined life as beginning at conception, which would make having a miscarriage or a life-saving abortion illegal.
On the other hand, he supports stem cell research. LOL! Can this guy not keep his stances straight or what?
Oh, and he wants to totally do away with federal funding for education--so all public schools would essentially become private schools. SORRY POOR PEOPLE--NO EDUCATION FOR YOU!
Here's some more crazy for you:
<quoted text>
Education is not a right? Why shouldn't people have the right to be educated, Paul? Is it because you want them to remain to ignorant to actually read some of the shit you post?
Yeah, things like this:
<quoted text>
So according to Paul, not only is education NOT a right, but neither is medical care. So I guess Paul wouldn't mind seeing ERs full of people stuck in the waiting room dying because they can't afford the care. No wait, he doesn't have to see that because he gets to sit on his ass in a fancy office.
Are there any questions why I think this guy is a schmuck?

it is really funny, should president give marriage in your country, maybe odumba does it.

Maladi wrote:

<quoted text>
Part of his plan to "restore" America:

Sorry I had to short it, but it is not possible to response by shortage.
These plans of Paul relies upon:
1. minimalize of administration - that´s why these cuts 10-15 % and it is very good idea and everything will be work very good and better, it does not work proparly now. This your food and drug administration, you eat really toxic substances. Your agricultural products are gained in 90% as genetically modified- it is toxic, what your drug and foor administration about it, production of meat in your country it means about poultry, stocks-it is horror, what is done there - this meat has more hormons, antibiotcs and bacteriaas nutrive values that´s why your society is fat and ill and additionally europe makes the same type of meat production as you. And this your food and drug administration ban to cultivate normal cereals ( everything must be genetically modified ) they are completely ill. It is such film like for instance unser ,,unser tägliches brot,,it is english version too or english film ,,food incorporation,,- it is good to see it and then to understand activity of this your food and drug adminsitration.
Central of disease - it will be cut of spends. It was so called swine flu - there were 4000 dead in your country, what did your center of disesase do to protect your nation? It was so simply way tp stop it- Vit. C, Calcium, protective masks or to shut the gob for instance with hand during cough and isolation of ill, was it done? If not, it means that it works no properly
2. to end wars, to end foreign aid - foreign aid is NO humanitarian aid for instance for haiti, foreign aid is dropping bombs on Afghanistan, Pakistan by using drones or your militaries - so called cannon fodder for wars, foreign aid in understanding of your criminal officials is to support regimes, which are criminal, not accepted by nations, but accepted by your criminal politicians, foreign aid of your country is to support some criminal chieftains and to help them to make ethnical or religious cleansing
3. to end taxes from dividents, taxes from capital gain and taxes from saving accounts-it is a very good idea and it is not only in interests of big investors. It is in interests of people, who have saving accounts and has small money in funds or another accounts and not fat billions but usual income. It is in interests of middle class, you must now pay dividents even if your banks made debts.
4. not to make vacations and foreign visits- it is very good idea
5. to control Mediaid and social issues. it is good idea too. Not to liquidate it, but to control what is going on with money there.It can be that money are lost there too. It was a woman in your country, who has cheated and who coned out of federal social aid a few milions dolars. She has lived in some kind of big villa. It is a very good idea to control it.
6. to cut off privilage and profits for lobbysts and people, who don´t need such privilage.
7. to boost dolar by stop to print more money and cover its values in gold, it is a very good idea too. It can be that your dolar will be like toillet paper, if nothing will be done.
8 to change some mad criminal acts of your former presidents: to lift sanctions against Iran, to repeal ndaa, patriot acts, war law, sopa, pipa

I think that this Ron Paul would be really good and strong and honest president.

sol wrote:

<quoted text> Oh, hello DUMBASS, I didn't know you could think. When did you start?

When I pulled out of your moms mouth.

southern atheist wrote:

<quoted text>
When I pulled out of your moms mouth.

Was that about the same time that your dad pulled out of your mouth?

sol wrote:

<quoted text> Was that about the same time that your dad pulled out of your mouth?

yeah he had to facial your dad because you know how he likes facials.

southern atheist wrote:

<quoted text>
yeah he had to facial your dad because you know how he likes facials.

You know sa, I really feel bad that I stooped to your level. You are really sick and disgusting. For a while, I actually thought you had some intelligence, but your posts proved me wrong. I kindly enjoyed arguing with you, and you made some good points, not that I agreed with you, but never the less it was entertaining. It suprised me that you turned out to be such sicko, and it angered me at myself for allowing you to bring me down to your level. I extend my apology to your dad for mentioning him in an unrespectful manner, when he had nothing to do with your low life remark. I will not respond to any more of your idiotical posts. Perhaps you got the best of me. Now I hope you feel like a big boy.

sol wrote:

<quoted text> You know sa, I really feel bad that I stooped to your level. You are really sick and disgusting. For a while, I actually thought you had some intelligence, but your posts proved me wrong. I kindly enjoyed arguing with you, and you made some good points, not that I agreed with you, but never the less it was entertaining. It suprised me that you turned out to be such sicko, and it angered me at myself for allowing you to bring me down to your level. I extend my apology to your dad for mentioning him in an unrespectful manner, when he had nothing to do with your low life remark. I will not respond to any more of your idiotical posts. Perhaps you got the best of me. Now I hope you feel like a big boy.

So You make a degenerative comment, I return the favor, your 1 up it then I one up it, then you came to my level, and i'm a sicko for being at the a level you came to , which in turn you try to bow out with a high-horse response.

Learn to take a joke my friend, we're all at the same level it's just how pretentious are you?

P.s. Ok cool. The correct response to my post was "Facial? i'm not sure what that is but I know your mom loves the donkey punch con filthy sanchez con with a superman ending from the large blackman we find on craigslist.

I AM _not_ LEGEND wrote:

<quoted text>
And I must, respectfully decline, as I have better things to do that will accomplish much more. And I didn't call your opinion pointless. I simply said it's pointless to try to dissuade me. Big difference. I suggest you learn that difference. As well as the difference between a free - marketeer and a fascist. They don't even have anything to do with each other. Fascism/Libertarianism deal with society. Socialism/free-market deal with economy.
Are you SURE you are a moderate? If so, we should have plenty of common ground, as I am a middle right Libertarian. But it seems we are opposites.
I suggest taking the political compass test at politicalcompass.org maybe you'll be surprised.

So you don't want to debate, but then you try to argue semantics with me? I guess come back with facts when you get over your confusion.

Dol wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry I had to short it, but it is not possible to response by shortage.
These plans of Paul relies upon:
1. minimalize of administration -

So WHY will less people make it better? You stated that it would, then went on for a paragraph telling me that our food supply is toxic that's why we're fat and worthless. When these people are laid off, will they not be joining our already bloated unemployed work force? Won't our economy take another hit when all these people can no longer consume?

Dol wrote:

Central of disease - it will be cut of spends. It was so called swine flu - there were 4000 dead in your country, what did your center of disesase do to protect your nation? It was so simply way tp stop it- Vit. C, Calcium, protective masks or to shut the gob for instance with hand during cough and isolation of ill, was it done? If not, it means that it works no properly

The CDC created a vaccine for the swine flu and informed the public of what to do in the event of having swine flu. Without a CDC, we would have mass chaos as all those worthless news reporters start flippin' out on the television about the End of Times.

Dol wrote:

2. to end wars, to end foreign aid - your foreign aid isn't humanitarian because it supports bad guys

While I don't doubt that you're onto something, quite a bit of our foreign aid also helps other countries who are in a bind.

For the most part, I can see that you do not speak English as your primary language, and that would explain what appear to be several misunderstandings of what was said. Most importantly is your assumption that a politician can be a good and honest man.

Maladi wrote:

<quoted text>
So you don't want to debate, but then you try to argue semantics with me? I guess come back with facts when you get over your confusion.

Get over the arrogant, puffed up image you have of yourself, and realize there are people who are just as intelligent as you, and they won't always agree with you. That's life. It doesn't mean your correct in acting better than them, and calling them ignorant for every little disagreement you have with them.

I'm beginning to wonder if you have any friends who actually like you for your personality.