Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri in 2010?

One should really read something about the subject before spouting off.
Alinsky’s tactics were unusual, humorous, and provocative. In his book Rules for Radicals, Alinsky describes the role of the organizer “to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a ‘dangerous enemy.’”

But though his means and methods have been and continue to be adopted by political groups, Alinsky was no fan of affiliations.

“I’ve never joined any organization — not even the ones I’ve organized myself,” Alinsky told Playboy in 1972, shortly before his death.“I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it’s Christianity or Marxism…The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide.”

By the 1950’s, Alinsky’s main focus was organizing African-American communities. He brought modern civil rights efforts to Chicago and helped the black community of Rochester, New York challenge the mighty Eastman Kodak’s hiring policies.

During the 1960’s Alinsky set up institutes to train other organizers, and his reputation as a visionary organizer and activist began to spread. None other than Hillary Clinton chose his work as the topic for a Wellesley College thesis in 1969. According to a 2007 Boston Globe article, Clinton interviewed Alinsky twice for the paper, which was entitled “There is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.”

In it, Clinton writes, also according to the Globe,“Much of what Alinsky professes does not sound ‘radical.”… His are the words used in our schools and churches, by our parents and their friends, by our peers. The difference is Alinsky really believes in them and recognizes the necessity of changing the present structures of our lives in order to realize them.”

Alinsky published his third book, Rules for Radicals, A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, in 1971, and it’s become popular even outside the communities and audiences he called his own. One prominent example: Dick Armey’s FreedomWorks, a conservative advocacy organization that assists tea party groups, has distributed Alinsky’s books in training sessions.

Saul Alinsky died of a heart attack in 1972, but his legacy lives on not only through the work of the IAF – now represented by 47 organizations across the country – but through the tactics of grass roots groups on all sides of the political playing field.

http://billmoyers.com/content/who-is-saul-ali...

1Watt Hermit wrote:

One should really read something about the subject before spouting off.
Alinsky’s tactics were unusual, humorous, and provocative. In his book Rules for Radicals, Alinsky describes the role of the organizer “to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a ‘dangerous enemy.’”
But though his means and methods have been and continue to be adopted by political groups, Alinsky was no fan of affiliations.
“I’ve never joined any organization — not even the ones I’ve organized myself,” Alinsky told Playboy in 1972, shortly before his death.“I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it’s Christianity or Marxism…The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide.”
By the 1950’s, Alinsky’s main focus was organizing African-American communities. He brought modern civil rights efforts to Chicago and helped the black community of Rochester, New York challenge the mighty Eastman Kodak’s hiring policies.
During the 1960’s Alinsky set up institutes to train other organizers, and his reputation as a visionary organizer and activist began to spread. None other than Hillary Clinton chose his work as the topic for a Wellesley College thesis in 1969. According to a 2007 Boston Globe article, Clinton interviewed Alinsky twice for the paper, which was entitled “There is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.”
In it, Clinton writes, also according to the Globe,“Much of what Alinsky professes does not sound ‘radical.”… His are the words used in our schools and churches, by our parents and their friends, by our peers. The difference is Alinsky really believes in them and recognizes the necessity of changing the present structures of our lives in order to realize them.”
Alinsky published his third book, Rules for Radicals, A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, in 1971, and it’s become popular even outside the communities and audiences he called his own. One prominent example: Dick Armey’s FreedomWorks, a conservative advocacy organization that assists tea party groups, has distributed Alinsky’s books in training sessions.
Saul Alinsky died of a heart attack in 1972, but his legacy lives on not only through the work of the IAF – now represented by 47 organizations across the country – but through the tactics of grass roots groups on all sides of the political playing field.
http://billmoyers.com/content/who-is-saul-ali...

Excellent Post...Typical Republican Hyprocrisy!

DNC Deranged Nut Cases wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of Mardi Gras, you are aware that it's a Catholic religious celebration. It celebrates Lent, which leads to the Easter Holiday. Since you liberals want to ban all Christian religious celebrations according to the posts I read from yesterday, you might as well include Mardi Gras on that list.

What festivals do they have in Dexter?
The Booger Fest? Confederative Memorial Day? How Quaint!

ZOMBIE Republicans wrote:

<quoted text>
9-11 didn't happen on Clintons watch ...Dumbass!

YOU PROVE THE IGNORANCE OF LIBERALS. 9-11 never should have happened. The reason 9-11 happened is that Bill Clinton treated the '93 bombing of the Trade Center as a crime, not as an act of war.

On February 26, 1993, Islamic terrorists parked a huge truck bomb in the garage underneath the North Tower of the World Trade Center – the second to fall on 9/11 – and detonated it. Six people were killed and 1,500 were injured. The terrorists had hoped to topple the tower that was filled with 25,000 office workers, and although the blast was very powerful, it was not big enough to bring the building down.

Instead of treating that attack as terrorism, however, the newly-installed Clinton administration treated it as a criminal act with civilian trials for the perpetrators. And for the remainder of Clinton’s term, until January 2001, terrorism was essentially ignored.

Because liberals and leftists in America and around the world are working – through benign negligence, through intentional negligence, or through surreptitious or overt cooperation – with Islamic terrorists who wish to infiltrate and disrupt Western societies.

So rather than tracking, surveilling, arresting and convicting terrorists for eight years under Clinton, nothing happened. When suspicious Middle Eastern males in their twenties were reported to the FBI because they were taking flying lessons, no action resulted.

Indeed, the 19 hijackers who took part on 9/11 were able during the latter years of the Clinton administration to give false and misleading information on their visa applications; overstay their visas; take aviation lessons and even simulator lessons for flying jetliners; travel freely around the country; get money wired in from overseas; obtain American drivers’ licenses; take reconnaissance flights on commercial airlines; and then perpetrate the 9/11 attacks using… box cutters??!!

9/11 in fact was a travesty of the first order. And of course we are never supposed to blame Clinton because it happened under Bush. But Bush had started to ramp up anti-terrorist surveillance in Spring 2001 as soon as he took office. Unfortunately, however, the Bush administration was handed an empty briefing book on terrorist activity from Bill Clinton, and so had to start from scratch.

Just think if Clinton had decided to commence a nationwide dragnet on suspicious activities right after the 1993 attack. There is no way in hell that 9/11 would have happened.

But 2001 was far too late. Even though the laptop of a very suspicious Moroccan named Zacharias Moussaoui of Minneapolis was seized during an immigration violation less than one month before 9/11, legal foot-dragging prevented law enforcement from accessing the contents of the computer, which would have blown the whole 9/11 plot wide open. Moussaoui was said to be the “20th hijacker”.

Since 9/11 we have begun to take steps to protect the nation from these radicals. Under Bush, from 9/11 until January 2009, we did a good job. No attacks. Under Obama, however, the record has been expectedly unacceptable:

*Four-and-a-half months into Obama’s presidency, on June 1, 2009, a black American convert to Islam born Carlos Bledsoe, aka Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, shot and killed Pvt. William Long in a jihad attack as Long was standing in front of a military recruiting center in Little Rock, Arkansas. Bledsoe was well known to law enforcement officials for suspicious activities including 16 months in Yemen. He even was arrested in Yemen.ears-after/

CONTINUED....

ZOMBIE Republicans wrote:

<quoted text>
9-11 didn't happen on Clintons watch ...Dumbass!

YOU PROVE THE IGNORANCE OF LIBERALS. 9-11 never should have happened. The reason 9-11 happened is that Bill Clinton treated the '93 bombing of the Trade Center as a crime, not as an act of war.

On February 26, 1993, Islamic terrorists parked a huge truck bomb in the garage underneath the North Tower of the World Trade Center – the second to fall on 9/11 – and detonated it. Six people were killed and 1,500 were injured. The terrorists had hoped to topple the tower that was filled with 25,000 office workers, and although the blast was very powerful, it was not big enough to bring the building down.

Instead of treating that attack as terrorism, however, the newly-installed Clinton administration treated it as a criminal act with civilian trials for the perpetrators. And for the remainder of Clinton’s term, until January 2001, terrorism was essentially ignored.

Because liberals and leftists in America and around the world are working – through benign negligence, through intentional negligence, or through surreptitious or overt cooperation – with Islamic terrorists who wish to infiltrate and disrupt Western societies.

So rather than tracking, surveilling, arresting and convicting terrorists for eight years under Clinton, nothing happened. When suspicious Middle Eastern males in their twenties were reported to the FBI because they were taking flying lessons, no action resulted.

Indeed, the 19 hijackers who took part on 9/11 were able during the latter years of the Clinton administration to give false and misleading information on their visa applications; overstay their visas; take aviation lessons and even simulator lessons for flying jetliners; travel freely around the country; get money wired in from overseas; obtain American drivers’ licenses; take reconnaissance flights on commercial airlines; and then perpetrate the 9/11 attacks using… box cutters??!!

9/11 in fact was a travesty of the first order. And of course we are never supposed to blame Clinton because it happened under Bush. But Bush had started to ramp up anti-terrorist surveillance in Spring 2001 as soon as he took office. Unfortunately, however, the Bush administration was handed an empty briefing book on terrorist activity from Bill Clinton, and so had to start from scratch.

Just think if Clinton had decided to commence a nationwide dragnet on suspicious activities right after the 1993 attack. There is no way in hell that 9/11 would have happened.

But 2001 was far too late. Even though the laptop of a very suspicious Moroccan named Zacharias Moussaoui of Minneapolis was seized during an immigration violation less than one month before 9/11, legal foot-dragging prevented law enforcement from accessing the contents of the computer, which would have blown the whole 9/11 plot wide open. Moussaoui was said to be the “20th hijacker”.

Since 9/11 we have begun to take steps to protect the nation from these radicals. Under Bush, from 9/11 until January 2009, we did a good job. No attacks. Under Obama, however, the record has been expectedly unacceptable:

*Four-and-a-half months into Obama’s presidency, on June 1, 2009, a black American convert to Islam born Carlos Bledsoe, aka Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, shot and killed Pvt. William Long in a jihad attack as Long was standing in front of a military recruiting center in Little Rock, Arkansas. Bledsoe was well known to law enforcement officials for suspicious activities including 16 months in Yemen. He even was arrested in Yemen.

CONTINUED..

LIBERTY OR DEATH wrote:

<quoted text>
This folks is what a Saul Alinsky radical tries to do. They try to spin what you said into being about something else. My opinion of her has nothing to do with her opinions or thoughts on Conservatives, she's entitled to think whatever she wants to. It's simply because the things she says reflects that of an America hating, communist loving, pile of human sh*t. Her attempts to accuse others of the very behavior she displays is one of the tactics of a left wing radical.
It doesn't get any more phony, or hypocritical, then that.
(it also has a little to do with her hearing the truth about herself and breaking down into tears because once again her precious little ego got its ass kicked)

Once again / little CON / you didn't respond to my post above. You assuming / labeling others like you did above / doesn't answer why you're so defensive of CONs / since you often swear here you aren't one.

Smithville / self-declared Independent / loses his shite responding to a post all about CONs. You can't handle the truth / you're a hypocrite / liar / phony. Face it / for you / the truth obviously hurts.

There was nothing America-hating in my post / it was / however / critical of / truthful about CONs. The more Smithville personally attacks others / the less support he has for his latest lame / uber POV.

Virtually all see you / for exactly what / who you are. We're done for now / bud / I've said multiple times before / I don't care what you think / you're irrelevant / responding to you is a waste of time.

This post is for others. Post early / often / little CON / there could be an uncommitted voter you haven't yet convinced / to vote for anybody but CONs. Relax / take one of your pills / have a good one.

LOL

YOU PROVE THE IGNORANCE OF LIBERALS. 9-11 never should have happened. The reason 9-11 happened is that Bill Clinton treated the '93 bombing of the Trade Center as a crime, not as an act of war.

On February 26, 1993, Islamic terrorists parked a huge truck bomb in the garage underneath the North Tower of the World Trade Center – the second to fall on 9/11 – and detonated it. Six people were killed and 1,500 were injured. The terrorists had hoped to topple the tower that was filled with 25,000 office workers, and although the blast was very powerful, it was not big enough to bring the building down.

Instead of treating that attack as terrorism, however, the newly-installed Clinton administration treated it as a criminal act with civilian trials for the perpetrators. And for the remainder of Clinton’s term, until January 2001, terrorism was essentially ignored.

Because liberals and leftists in America and around the world are working – through benign negligence, through intentional negligence, or through surreptitious or overt cooperation – with Islamic terrorists who wish to infiltrate and disrupt Western societies.

So rather than tracking, surveilling, arresting and convicting terrorists for eight years under Clinton, nothing happened. When suspicious Middle Eastern males in their twenties were reported to the FBI because they were taking flying lessons, no action resulted.

Indeed, the 19 hijackers who took part on 9/11 were able during the latter years of the Clinton administration to give false and misleading information on their visa applications; overstay their visas; take aviation lessons and even simulator lessons for flying jetliners; travel freely around the country; get money wired in from overseas; obtain American drivers’ licenses; take reconnaissance flights on commercial airlines; and then perpetrate the 9/11 attacks using… box cutters??!!

9/11 in fact was a travesty of the first order. And of course we are never supposed to blame Clinton because it happened under Bush. But Bush had started to ramp up anti-terrorist surveillance in Spring 2001 as soon as he took office. Unfortunately, however, the Bush administration was handed an empty briefing book on terrorist activity from Bill Clinton, and so had to start from scratch.

*Four-and-a-half months into Obama’s presidency, on June 1, 2009, a black American convert to Islam born Carlos Bledsoe, aka Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, shot and killed Pvt. William Long in a jihad attack as Long was standing in front of a military recruiting center in Little Rock, Arkansas. Bledsoe was well known to law enforcement officials for suspicious activities including 16 months in Yemen. He even was arrested in Yemen.

*On May 1, 2010, fifteen-and-one-half months into the Obama presidency, only luck prevented the Times Square truck bomb of Pakistani-born US citizen Faisal Shahzad from detonating. Yet with law enforcement on his tail, Shahzad was able to board an aircraft bound for Dubai even though he was on a no-fly list and had purchased his ticket at the last minute with cash, a sure red flag in the war on terror.

These lapses under Obama are pristine examples of exactly how 9/11 happened. They demonstrate that even after 9/11 that we can be undermined even when we have strong clues about who is doing the undermining. It comes through pure negligence, often intentional, by the Democrat left.

Meanwhile, a 95-year-old caucasian lady with cancer was stripped of her adult diaper by Florida airport security officials because they said the diaper could be concealing a weapon.

Welcome to Obama’s terrorist-friendly America where all the wrong people are scrutinized. In fact shortly after the Times Square incident, far-left New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg conjectured that the bomber might have been someone upset with the health-care bill… i.e., it must have been a Tea Partier or other conservative.

http://www.redstate.com/nikitas3/2011/09/09/9...

*On November 5, 2009, less than one year into Obama’s term, US Army major Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim, killed 14 people at Fort Hood, Texas and wounded 29, even though Army officials were well aware that Hasan was an Islamic radical with a wild streak. And if you remember Obama’s casual press conference to address the Fort Hood killings, it was a sign of pure malice.

*On Christmas Day 2009, Nigerian-born Omar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to detonate a bomb on board a flight from Amsterdam, Holland as it neared Detroit. He failed. Abdulmutallab’s own father had warned international officials about his son’s extremist leanings. Abdulmutallab was known for several years to international anti-terror officials. Yet somehow he was able to board a flight with a bomb in his underwear and almost succeeded in detonating it.

*On May 1, 2010, fifteen-and-one-half months into the Obama presidency, only luck prevented the Times Square truck bomb of Pakistani-born US citizen Faisal Shahzad from detonating. Yet with law enforcement on his tail, Shahzad was able to board an aircraft bound for Dubai even though he was on a no-fly list and had purchased his ticket at the last minute with cash, a sure red flag in the war on terror.

These lapses under Obama are pristine examples of exactly how 9/11 happened. They demonstrate that even after 9/11 that we can be undermined even when we have strong clues about who is doing the undermining. It comes through pure negligence, often intentional, by the Democrat left.

Meanwhile, a 95-year-old caucasian lady with cancer was stripped of her adult diaper by Florida airport security officials because they said the diaper could be concealing a weapon.

Welcome to Obama’s terrorist-friendly America where all the wrong people are scrutinized. In fact shortly after the Times Square incident, far-left New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg conjectured that the bomber might have been someone upset with the health-care bill… i.e., it must have been a Tea Partier or other conservative.

http://www.redstate.com/nikitas3/2011/09/09/9...

Chilli J wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again / little CON / you didn't respond to my post above. You assuming / labeling others like you did above / doesn't answer why you're so defensive of CONs / since you often swear here you aren't one.
Smithville / self-declared Independent / loses his shite responding to a post all about CONs. You can't handle the truth / you're a hypocrite / liar / phony. Face it / for you / the truth obviously hurts.
There was nothing America-hating in my post / it was / however / critical of / truthful about CONs. The more Smithville personally attacks others / the less support he has for his latest lame / uber POV.
Virtually all see you / for exactly what / who you are. We're done for now / bud / I've said multiple times before / I don't care what you think / you're irrelevant / responding to you is a waste of time.
This post is for others. Post early / often / little CON / there could be an uncommitted voter you haven't yet convinced / to vote for anybody but CONs. Relax / take one of your pills / have a good one.
LOL

We're done for now? Are you sure about that? The last time you said that you followed it up with 39 straight posts over a 3 week period that were all directed at me. You can't help it. As others have pointed out you are an insecure little troll that when you hear the truth about yourself you have to relentlessly attack until your fragile little ego feels vindicated.

It's too bad for you that all the drivel you post doesn't change who and what you are...an America hating, communist loving, pile of human filth that is no better then the lowest scum our nation has locked up in her prisons.

ZOMBIE Republicans wrote:

<quoted text>
What festivals do they have in Dexter?
The Booger Fest? Confederative Memorial Day? How Quaint!

The only festival that your anti American bleeding heart liberal commie jerk azs attends in SUCK LEWIS is welfare check cashing day at the Liquor store

Wow revision history!
In January of 2001 Bush was handed the final section, Phase III, of the Hart Rudman report. The bipartisan two and half year study of terrorism gave Bush a detailed map, a detailed set of directions as to how make our nation safe. Hart Rudman's final report, with its recommendation that the nation create a Homeland Security Department, was given to our new president because HR knew it would take a lot of political capital to pass, political capital, something new presidents have. It would take a leader. With HR as a backdrop or template, congress proposed three bills in early 2001 to get the ball rolling on creating a Homeland Security Department. Bush rebuffed their efforts. Even Newt said, "The administration actually slowed down response to Hart-Rudman when momentum was building in the spring," Sadly, Bush used his "capital" to pass tax cuts for his fat cat friends.

Make no mistake, Bush told the congress and told the Hart Rudman report to take a hike. Ignoring the hard work and the accurate predictions of HR and Congress, in May 2001, Bush announced that Dick Cheney would put together a group and work on the problem terrorism and that he(Bush) would occasionally chair the group with Cheney. When announcing that Cheney would do this, Bush went so far as to say that the terrorist threat, though very real, was "not immediate". Lord only knows what idiot told him to add that to his statement but he did.(see below) That really doesn't matter because, as we all know, Cheney's group NEVER met.

Couple things about this, Bush's decision to wait for Cheney to find time for our nation's security, should have sent up a red flag to the country that Bush was not prepared to be president. Ignoring Hart Rudman's recommendation was the worst decision ever made by or for a President. How bad? It is likely to result in WW3 if it hasn't already.
Every read the testamony of Richard Clark, about how he was totally ignored along with the FBI and others:
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp...

If Billy boy Clinton would have been doing his job, instead of getting a knob job in the Oval office, 9-11 may not have ever occurred! I wonder how many of those people in the towers, some jumped, died because of Billy Boy's sexapades. Millions tax dollars paid out on the wars and how many soldiers died? Maybe, maybe, a lot of this could have been prevented had clinton being doing his job!!!

Bill Clinton is the first U.S President to admit under oath to masturbating in the Oval Office.

fast to the end

BILL CLINTON 'LOST VITAL WHITE HOUSE NUCLEAR CODES'
For several months during Bill Clinton's administration, a former top military officer says the White House lost the card with a set of numbers for opening the briefcase containing the codes for a nuclear attack.

Gen Hugh Shelton, who was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, said in his new memoir, "Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of an American Warrior" that "the codes were actually missing for months. That's a big deal -- a gargantuan deal."

A similar claim was made by Lt Col Robert Patterson, a former aide, in a book published seven years ago. He was one of the men who carried the briefcase, known as the "football", and he said that the morning after the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke that he made a routine request of the president to present the card so that he could provide an updated version.

"He thought he just placed them upstairs," Lt Col Patterson recalled. "We called upstairs, we started a search around the White House for the codes, and he finally confessed that he in fact misplaced them. He couldn't recall when he had last seen them."

He said the President lost the card holding the codes, which is known as the biscuit, in 1998, but according to Gen Shelton, the card went missing in 2000.

Former president Jimmy Carter was rumoured to have once left the '"biscuit" in a suit that was sent to the dry cleaners.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/nor...

The real USA First wrote:

<quoted text>
The only festival that your anti American bleeding heart liberal commie jerk azs attends in SUCK LEWIS is welfare check cashing day at the Liquor store

Oh ...lets watch UNReal The King TAMPON of the Bleeding Pu@@y fest(Prom)...hahahahahaha!!!!

Ignorant Liberals wrote:

If Billy boy Clinton would have been doing his job, instead of getting a knob job in the Oval office, 9-11 may not have ever occurred! I wonder how many of those people in the towers, some jumped, died because of Billy Boy's sexapades. Millions tax dollars paid out on the wars and how many soldiers died? Maybe, maybe, a lot of this could have been prevented had clinton being doing his job!!!
Bill Clinton is the first U.S President to admit under oath to masturbating in the Oval Office.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp...
At a conference on domestic terrorism held in Washington, DC (see July 10-11, 2001), Assistant FBI Director Dale Watson, the head of the Counterterrorism Division, warns that a significant terrorist attack is likely on US soil. He says,“I’m not a gloom-and-doom-type person. But I will tell you this.[We are] headed for an incident inside the United States.”
The SEIB is usually released one day after the corresponding President Daily Briefing and contains similar content (see January 20-September 10, 2001), so it is probable Bush receives this information
Two days before the summit begins, the BBC reports:“The huge force of officers and equipment which has been assembled to deal with unrest has been spurred on by a warning that supporters of Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden might attempt an air attack on some of the world leaders present.”
CIA Director Tenet has a special meeting with National Security Adviser Rice and her aides about al-Qaeda. Says one official at the meeting,“[Tenet] briefed [Rice] that there was going to be a major attack.” Another at the meeting says Tenet displays a huge wall chart showing dozens of threats.
British intelligence agencies send a report to British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other top officials warning that al-Qaeda is in “the final stages” of preparing an attack in the West. The prediction is “based on intelligence gleaned not just from [British intelligence] but also from US agencies, including the CIA and the National Security Agency,”
The G8 summit is held in Genoa, Italy. Acting on previous warnings that al-Qaeda would attempt to kill President Bush and other leaders, Italian authorities surround the summit with anti-aircraft guns. They keep fighter jets in the air and close off local airspace to all planes. The warnings are taken so seriously that Bush stays overnight on an aircraft carrier offshore
European official says Beghal talks about “very important figures in the al-Qaeda structure, right up to bin Laden’s inner circle.[He] mention[s] names, responsibilities and functions—people we weren’t even aware of before. This is important stuff.”[Time, 11/12/2001] One French official says of Beghal’s interrogations,“We shared everything we knew with the Americans.”
In his 2007 book, CIA Director George Tenet will write that on this day,“From Afghanistan came word that the Taliban intelligence chief, Qari Amadullah, was interested in establishing secret contact, outside the country and without Mullah Omar’s knowledge,“to save Afghanistan.”[Tenet, 2007, pp. 156] However, it is unclear if the offer was acted upon
//

go read that entire time line and then see if you can blame anyone but Bush/cheney?

Liberal Ignorance wrote:

This post was edited for brevity..All improtant facts were left

9-11 never should have happened.

Republicans WERE in Charge on 9-11
GOP = Lie and blame someone else
the deaths of all those people in the towers can be blamed on a GOP F**k-UP...a bunch of arrogant fu-k-ups!
Even Worse was W letting all the Saudi's and the Bin Laden's flee the country on private jets, when ALL civil aviation was shut down!
You prove how IGNORANT YOU ARE!
Now what are you wearign to the TRAILER FESTIVAL in Branson!

Your search - BILL CLINTON 'LOST VITAL WHITE HOUSE NUCLEAR CODES'- did not match any news results.

Making stuff up and lying is the hallmark of TeaBirchers.

Your search - Bill Clinton is the first U.S President to admit under oath to masturbating in the Oval Office. - did not match any news results.

Teapublica­ns have only three things that they propose.Cu­t taxes on the job creators,r­emove all regulation­s that protect the public,and privatize as much public benifits as possible.T­his is all that they have offered for as long as I can remember.T­hey sell this dumb policy and try to call it Freedumb and we lose as their donors prosper.