How Oklahoma Schools Are Preparing For President Obama's Speech...

Fred Buck wrote:

Funny here in Texas all we heard was the president saying: People of earth bring me your children, we want them for future mind control, obey or we will destory your planet. Too tell you the truth some parents took their kids out of school, just so they could watch at home.

Thats what I did! My kids backward redneck school decided to not show it in all classes!

Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
I honestly don't think that it is a valid argument to say that Bush was twice the Republican Party’s nominee for President, who was elected to office both times, but somehow the Republican Party bears no responsibility for how he acted while in office, especially considering that the Republican Party held a majority in Congress for half of those years.
As far as from what I can tell, the hard-core-right is dominating the Republican Party at this time even more then during the Bush years. Cheney seems to be the party's new spokesperson, and the Republican tent has become so small that any moderate, like General Powell, is unwelcome.

Actually, the tent got too big. Subsidizing private industry, illegal wiretapping (Patriot Act), growing government at unprecedented levels, expanding Medicare and Medicaid programs -- these are not Republican values, nor are they American valiues.

Besides, you guys bear some of the resonsibility for Bush's two wins. The first time, you gave us a boring nincompoop with a false sense of his own intelligence and importance, and the second time, you gave us an effeminite prettyboy from Massachussetts who lied about his military service and got manicures nad pedicures. Give me a Democrat who actually believes in our Constitution, not just the parts that he thinks cover pedophiles' "rights", and I'll vote for him in a heartbeat.

Greasy McFaggot wrote:

<quoted text>
I love Constitutional "scholars." In fact, your posts have created the need for me to go take care of my own "constitution." LoL!

No substance, only insults. At least I include substance in my posts, along with the insults.

Da Real Butchey Weinstein wrote:

<quoted text>
No substance, only insults. At least I include substance in my posts, along with the insults.

Hmmm, I guess you could call the tripe you write substance. I suppose you could argue that manure is a substance.

However, most of what you write is simply self-serving rhetoric meant to bait people into an argument. You don't really seem to care whether you are right or wrong as long as somebody takes your bait.

So what is it you are doing teabagger? Lord I am done with idiots.. good luck to ya Butchey, there are just too many.

JUST WONDERING wrote:

<quoted text>
Very good. I accept that as fact. Another fact is that the polls show the same people who voted him in office feel they were misled and were duped. Just like it was explained to me, his popularity is falling faster than octomoms uterus. Care to explain that?
Oh' by the way, did you get in on the breakfast special Denny's was offering Commemorating Octomom?
14 eggs, no sausage and the guy next to you can pay for it!

Why do you insist on meaningless rhetoric? If President Obama is a one term President ... so be it. It's up to American voters to decide that. If I had a crystal ball that accurately predicted their will..... I would be the richest person in the world.

Really, at the bitter end of it all, have you no shame, or are you all rhetoric and propaganda, just one more hard-core-right-wing egotist? Can you never make the emotional and moral leap to leave the world where only you count and only you matter, and join the community in which you live?

Teasly McBagger wrote:

<quoted text>
Hmmm, I guess you could call the tripe you write substance. I suppose you could argue that manure is a substance.
However, most of what you write is simply self-serving rhetoric meant to bait people into an argument. You don't really seem to care whether you are right or wrong as long as somebody takes your bait.

That shows how embecilic you are. If anything, my posts convey a firm belief. You may not agree with it, but I don't waver. You, on the other hand, seem to get your jollies out of insulting your betters -- i.e. conservatives who aren't on the dole, and who understand the principles upon which our country was founded.

just_a_name wrote:

So what is it you are doing teabagger? Lord I am done with idiots.. good luck to ya Butchey, there are just too many.

Greay McFaggot is nothing but a troll, and he knows that anyone who actually loves this country is by definition his better. He can't stand himself, so he takes it out on people with home he disagrees..

Da Real Butchey Weinstein wrote:

<quoted text>
No substance, only insults. At least I include substance in my posts, along with the insults.

No, you don't. There is no substance to your posts, only insults. Thankfully your posts are preserved, and you do not control the delete button.

Push come to shove, you do more harm to your (supposed) cause then good. That is the one thing I will thank you for.

P.S. By the way, The Lords of Flatbush is one of the lamest movies I ever had to suffer though. I was a lot like eating hot sauce made in New Jersey.

Da Real Butchey Weinstein wrote:

<quoted text>
That shows how embecilic you are. If anything, my posts convey a firm belief. You may not agree with it, but I don't waver. You, on the other hand, seem to get your jollies out of insulting your betters -- i.e. conservatives who aren't on the dole, and who understand the principles upon which our country was founded.

I think the only firm belief you hold is that you are smarter than everybody else. You're not.

You have spent some time studying the Constitution. That's great. Keep cracking those books and you may eventually make something of yourself.

Da Real Butchey Weinstein wrote:

<quoted text>
Greay McFaggot is nothing but a troll, and he knows that anyone who actually loves this country is by definition his better. He can't stand himself, so he takes it out on people with home he disagrees..

The only "homes" I disagree with are those ones they build on the edges of cliffs in California. Is that what you are talking about? You aren't one of the cliff-dwellers, are you?

Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you insist on meaningless rhetoric? If President Obama is a one term President ... so be it. It's up to American voters to decide that. If I had a crystal ball that accurately predicted their will..... I would be the richest person in the world.
Really, at the bitter end of it all, have you no shame, or are you all rhetoric and propaganda, just one more hard-core-right-wing egotist? Can you never make the emotional and moral leap to leave the world where only you count and only you matter, and join the community in which you live?

Read more: Camille Paglia, Opinion, Barack Obama

Sept. 9, 2009 | What a difference a month makes! When my last controversial column posted on Salon in the second week of August, most Democrats seemed frozen in suspended animation, not daring to criticize the Obama administration's bungling of healthcare reform lest it give aid and comfort to the GOP. Well, that ice dam sure broke with a roar. Dissident Democrats found their voices, and by late August even the liberal lemmings of the mainstream media, from CBS to CNN, had drastically altered their tone of reportage, from priggish disdain of the town hall insurgency to frank admission of serious problems in the healthcare bills as well as of Obama's declining national support.

But this tonic dose of truth-telling may be too little too late. As an Obama supporter and contributor, I am outraged at the slowness with which the standing army of Democratic consultants and commentators publicly expressed discontent with the administration's strategic missteps this year. I suspect there had been private grumbling all along, but the media warhorses failed to speak out when they should have -- from week one after the inauguration, when Obama went flat as a rug in letting Congress pass that obscenely bloated stimulus package. Had more Democrats protested, the administration would have felt less arrogantly emboldened to jam through a cap-and-trade bill whose costs have made it virtually impossible for an alarmed public to accept the gargantuan expenses of national healthcare reform.

darth vader wrote:

<quoted text>if you only knew the power of the dark side

I think everyone here remembers Darth Cheney and George Bush wiping their asses with the consitution.

Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
No, you don't. There is no substance to your posts, only insults. Thankfully your posts are preserved, and you do not control the delete button.
Push come to shove, you do more harm to your (supposed) cause then good. That is the one thing I will thank you for.
P.S. By the way, The Lords of Flatbush is one of the lamest movies I ever had to suffer though. I was a lot like eating hot sauce made in New Jersey.

I can't help it if you're so ruled by your emotional ties to your beliefs that you are unable to get what I'm saying. As for the Lord of Flatbush, it wasn't THAT bad. It was better than, say, The Story of Us, Gandhi, Birth, or An Inconvenient Truth.

Teasly McBagger wrote:

<quoted text>
I think the only firm belief you hold is that you are smarter than everybody else. You're not.
You have spent some time studying the Constitution. That's great. Keep cracking those books and you may eventually make something of yourself.

Thanks. I'd tell you the same, but you'll never amount to anything, no matter how hard you try.

Teasly McBagger wrote:

<quoted text>
The only "homes" I disagree with are those ones they build on the edges of cliffs in California. Is that what you are talking about? You aren't one of the cliff-dwellers, are you?

Out of ammo, restort to insults -- the leftist strategy. No wait, Greasy never did have any ammo in the first place.

Thursday, September 10, 2009
Exposed! ACORN Gets Its Nuts Cracked: Teenage Prostitutes, Money Laundering and Tax Fraud
by Doug Giles

It appears as if ACORN is not just into soup kitchens, daycare, voter fraud and town hall intimidation; they will also help a young wannabe Madame jumpstart a whorehouse. ShamWow, folks! Community organizing, indeed! I mean ... what community is complete and feels truly organized without some hookers in the hood? God bless 'em. It brings a tear to your eye, now doesn't it? Hope and change, folks. Hope and change.

Da Real Butchey Weinstein wrote:

<quoted text>
You liberals aren't free-thinking, and you just proved that fact with this post. It's gotta be abour race -- it can't be about ideals or the proper role of government, it's gotta be about race. That mantra is old.
Oh, and Sally Kern and Steve Russell, on their worst day, are both 50 times the human being you will ever be, on your best day. I know them both personally, and you lack the courage integrity or intelligence to sit at the same table with either of them.

Oh Butchey...you should go masturbate with your gun while reading your bible porn! Wait, you probably already are...YOU AND your personal friends are weak-minded control freaks who hide behind religion to further their hate cause! Racism is the base for the hatred, caused by the crutch that is religion! It's obvious to me that anyone who believes in talking snakes, can't be anything but delusional. You've never had the pleasure of making my acquaintance, so you can't say that those ignoramuses are better than I am. I would love to debate both of those mental midgets! Bo Peep is looking for you...go home, Fluffy!

i cant honestly believe people would hold their children from school because the President is addressing them on the importance of taking responsibility for their education, or for ANY reason for that matter. As much as i DESPISED fmr. pres Bush, i would have NEVER stopped my children from listening to his public addresses and formulating their own opinion. Its absurd!
And provided the content of the address, taking responsibility, you'd think the republicans with their whole "personal and fiscal responsibility" views would be all over it.
quit being suck weenies. you're ridiculous.

J_M_P wrote:

i cant honestly believe people would hold their children from school because the President is addressing them on the importance of taking responsibility for their education, or for ANY reason for that matter. As much as i DESPISED fmr. pres Bush, i would have NEVER stopped my children from listening to his public addresses and formulating their own opinion. Its absurd!
And provided the content of the address, taking responsibility, you'd think the republicans with their whole "personal and fiscal responsibility" views would be all over it.
quit being suck weenies. you're ridiculous.

tunnel vision