State Attorney and Public Defender (Duval County FL)

Judged:

1

1

1

left field wrote:

so lets get back to Frank Shoemaker, that other "Godly" man..after all birds of a feather flock together don't they? What are his plans now that he can no longer look at porn in the offfice or sexually harass employees? He will have a real hard time getting a job in the legal community around here...who has the inside poop?

Judged:

1

1

1

makesnosense wrote:

<quoted text>
interesting comment you had. what i wonder about is what was shirk thinking by retaining the person you mentioned? moving him from one office to the other, does not take care of the problem...it only moves the problem from one location to another. but then again if that person had anything to do with getting shirk in office, maybe shirk felt he had to pay him back (like so many others) by giving him a job in his new administration.

Judged:

2

1

1

Really wrote:

<quoted text>
Godly? Hardly.

Judged:

2

2

1

The real Pine Lakes wrote:

<quoted text>
like so many others? Shirk had NO ONE on his campaign. It was him and his family. He had no staff, no republican party support to speak of, his father-in-law was his one man sign crew and only had 35k in campaign funds. He owes no one anything. No political favors to anyone. Bill White had more Republican support than Shirk. Your argument fails miserably.

Judged:

1

1

1

The real Pine Lakes wrote:

<quoted text>
like so many others? Shirk had NO ONE on his campaign. It was him and his family. He had no staff, no republican party support to speak of, his father-in-law was his one man sign crew and only had 35k in campaign funds. He owes no one anything. No political favors to anyone. Bill White had more Republican support than Shirk. Your argument fails miserably.

get a life wrote:

lets get back to Frank Shoemaker, that other Godly man..after all birds of a feather flock together don't they? what will he do now that he can no longer earn 68K a year watching porn on the public payroll, or sexually harassing his fellow employees? I bet he will have a hard time getting a job in the legal community...I feel for his kids...

Judged:

2

1

1

No idea wrote:

<quoted text>
you obviously don't know Shirk. But more actually I think that was a jab at the athiest Bill White.

Judged:

1

1

1

get a life wrote:

lets get back to Frank Shoemaker, that other Godly man..after all birds of a feather flock together don't they? what will he do now that he can no longer earn 68K a year watching porn on the public payroll, or sexually harassing his fellow employees? I bet he will have a hard time getting a job in the legal community...I feel for his kids...

Judged:

2

2

1

makesnosense wrote:

<quoted text>
interesting comment you had. what i wonder about is what was shirk thinking by retaining the person you mentioned? moving him from one office to the other, does not take care of the problem...it only moves the problem from one location to another. but then again if that person had anything to do with getting shirk in office, maybe shirk felt he had to pay him back (like so many others) by giving him a job in his new administration.

Judged:

2

1

1

The REAL Truth2Power wrote:

<quoted text>
So true

Judged:

1

The REAL Truth2Power wrote:

<quoted text>
I doubt you care about his kids at all. Matt at least fired him instead of allowing immoral attorneys hang around and continue to draw a huge salary.

Judged:

2

2

2

peace on earth wrote:

<quoted text>
You obviously do not know Bill White as he is not an atheist. It is a real shame that so many of you who claim to be Christian are willing to bear false witness against this man who can probably out quote you and Matt when it comes to Bible verse. Contrary to your beliefs Bill not only can talk the talk but does a much better job than you could ever hope to do on walking the walk. It is too bad that you never took the time to really get to know him when you had an opportunity.

Judged:

1

peace on earth wrote:

<quoted text>
You obviously do not know Bill White as he is not an atheist. It is a real shame that so many of you who claim to be Christian are willing to bear false witness against this man who can probably out quote you and Matt when it comes to Bible verse. Contrary to your beliefs Bill not only can talk the talk but does a much better job than you could ever hope to do on walking the walk. It is too bad that you never took the time to really get to know him when you had an opportunity.

Judged:

1

1

1

agree wrote:

<quoted text>
Bill was and continues to be a good man.

Judged:

1

1

1

The REAL Truth2Power wrote:

<quoted text>
You can spin it all you want, the man did not live a Godly life, Matt has.

Not From Pine Lakes wrote:

<quoted text>I heard Shirk cheated on wife #1 with wife #2. I could care less, but if you want to throw stones...