Newt Gingrich demands future debate audiences be allowed to applaud...

Judged:

1

1

Just Sayin wrote:

Don't allow the audience to applaud because I can't stand the pig.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mickler wrote:

<quoted text>
The audience would be allowed to applaud for his opponents too. Why are you against Gingrich in particular or is it that you're against his party?

Judged:

3

1

Just Sayin wrote:

<quoted text>

I am an Independent which means I don't like either party. They are all crooks.

Judged:

2

1

Libertarian wrote:

<quoted text>
Agree, vote Ron Paul or for a third party. Otherwise it does not matter who gets elected. Our government has been hi-jacked by a cartel of crooks for many years and the looting will continue as long as the voters keep buying into the same old lies told over and over again by the two major parties.
Less government is better government. The less crooked crony capitilism the better.

Judged:

1

1

1

Just Sayin wrote:

<quoted text>
Why am i against Gingrich????????
1. He looks pregnant.
2. He is a back stabber.(Clinton)
3. He is a liar.
4. He is just another establishment shill.(Fannie/Freddie)
5. He divorced his first wife because she wasn't pretty enough to be a presidents wife, but he current wife has a nose like a parrot.
I am an Independent which means I don't like either party. They are all crooks.

Libertarian wrote:

<quoted text>
Agree, vote Ron Paul or for a third party. Otherwise it does not matter who gets elected. Our government has been hi-jacked by a cartel of crooks for many years and the looting will continue as long as the voters keep buying into the same old lies told over and over again by the two major parties.
Less government is better government. The less crooked crony capitilism the better.

Judged:

2

Mickler wrote:

<quoted text>
The audience would be allowed to applaud for his opponents too. Why are you against Gingrich in particular or is it that you're against his party?

Mickler wrote:

<quoted text>
Fair enough.

HTS wrote:

<quoted text>So, you're a spineless independent. Youre someone who thinks they're above the fray when in reality you can't take a stand. A large number of independents voted for Obama. I certainly woildn't want my name associated with any group that would give any deference to a Marxist.

firehimnow wrote:

<quoted text>What ya gonna do when the dem and repub party are infested with vermin, thieves, and halfwits? For over fifty years the country has been going downhill with the "kick the can S--t" perped by the two parties of PT Barnum.

Just Sayin wrote:

<quoted text>
You misunderstood what I was referring to. Gingrich said if the audience couldn't applaud he would not show up.
That sounds good to me.

Judged:

1

HTS wrote:

<quoted text>So, you're a spineless independent.

Just Sayin wrote:

<quoted text>
Why am i against Gingrich????????
1. He looks pregnant.
2. He is a back stabber.(Clinton)
3. He is a liar.
4. He is just another establishment shill.(Fannie/Freddie)
5. He divorced his first wife because she wasn't pretty enough to be a presidents wife, but he current wife has a nose like a parrot.
I am an Independent which means I don't like either party. They are all crooks.

Mickler wrote:

<quoted text>
Ron Paul doesn't have a viable chance at being elected, so added him only splits the Republican vote. It doesn't help to oust the sitting president. It helps ensure his re-election.

pigpen911 wrote:

<quoted text>Not only are you an Independent(not)but you are a very shollow person to attack someone on their looks.Ever take a good look at Obama or his wife? Just asking.If you want to judge someone on his pass how about Obama's pass? OH wait,you can't,he had all of his pass records sealed,why?

pigpen911 wrote:

<quoted text>Not only are you an Independent(not)but you are a very shollow person to attack someone on their looks.Ever take a good look at Obama or his wife? Just asking.If you want to judge someone on his pass how about Obama's pass? OH wait,you can't,he had all of his pass records sealed,why?

Mickler wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree with you that how Gingrich looks shouldn't matter. Nonetheless, I see nothing wrong with his appearance. All of the candidates are presentable looking (the president and first lady are as well), but it isn't a beauty contest either. Dealing with life changing issues on a superficial basis won't resolve anything. Personal attacks are just that. I'm more concerned with the record and plans going forward. Umemployment is at a record high. Many people have lost their healthcare due to losing their jobs. The cost of living is going up. If someone has real solutions to those kinds of issues, they could look like a duck and I would care less. I will acknowledge, though, that the information age and the forms of news (unfortunately) place far more emphasis on appearance. Let's not forget that Roosevelt lead the country from a wheelchair.

Judged:

1

1

1

tha Professor wrote:

<quoted text>
So it's bad to attack someone because of their looks...and yet you are doing just that with the Obamas? I think they're a fine looking family personally, but then I'm not an angry conservative.
What "pass records" are you even talking about? How do they pertain to his Presidency?