|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Belmont hill Mitt wrote: <quoted text> no one takes ron paul seriously because he wants to shut down the governemnt. I like his two and a half ideas, but beyond that, he comes from the same clown car that the rest of them do. I think he is against the NDAA And getting molested at the airport. Some how this dumbo made it through medical school.When I would see him in debates with the others they are always smirking and laughing at him and I think wow hes the doctor here and they act like they are above him somehow.The jokes on them.Maybe what's so funny to them is he thinks about taking care of people and they think about taking care of themselves.
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Belmont hill Mitt wrote: former presidents are sucking up millions of dollars to keep them in the style they are accustomed to. they all do it, even nancy reagan!! bill clinton to the tune of 800000 plus. jimmy carter?? 500000... gwbush almost one million and his son, the 43rd..... 1.3 million. per year. we didnt even pay them this much when they were in office?? talk about pork that could be cut? they are ALL acting like 1 percenters... Wow...And you would miss all this if Uncle Ron took it all away? They are 1 percenters.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
"Senator Rand Paul Endorses Email Featuring A Rifle Aimed At President Obama's Head.(IMAGE)" Click here: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/05/10/repub...
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Judged:
1
1
I was out with friends and we were talking about gays and wondering why if they are together because they like their own kind then why does one seem to take on the female role? and why does that one act more like a woman than a woman.It's like really extreme to being the female.Like Monroe on steroids. If they want there own kind why is one pretending to be what they aren't?
|
|
Mobile-Amused
Crossville, TN
|
Hey wrote: I was out with friends and we were talking about gays and wondering why if they are together because they like their own kind then why does one seem to take on the female role? and why does that one act more like a woman than a woman.It's like really extreme to being the female.Like Monroe on steroids. If they want there own kind why is one pretending to be what they aren't? You've never encountered a hetero couple where the wife "wears the pants" in the relationship?
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Really Sassy wrote: "Senator Rand Paul Endorses Email Featuring A Rifle Aimed At President Obama's Head.(IMAGE)" Click here: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/05/10/repub... To me it doesn't look like it's clearly pointing at Obama.To me it looks like the gun is above both of them.
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Mobile-Amused wrote: <quoted text> You've never encountered a hetero couple where the wife "wears the pants" in the relationship? It's not about who is the boss it is about extreme feminism very dramatically so.
|
|
Belmont hill Mitt
Anderson, CA
|
Judged:
1
1
Hey wrote: <quoted text> To me it doesn't look like it's clearly pointing at Obama.To me it looks like the gun is above both of them. you wernt looking long and hard enough ..... if that thing went off, it would take the top of obama's head off!! I find it offensive, because they planned it that way.
|
|
|
|
Belmont hill Mitt
Anderson, CA
|
Hey wrote: I was out with friends and we were talking about gays and wondering why if they are together because they like their own kind then why does one seem to take on the female role? and why does that one act more like a woman than a woman.It's like really extreme to being the female.Like Monroe on steroids. If they want there own kind why is one pretending to be what they aren't? you must not personally have met and gotten to know many lesbians..... ive dated a few. yes many of them try to "wear the pants" but it is because there is a part of them that wants to be as eqaul as possible to men....which is fine, if they balalnce it with their feminine side. just like hetro men have more feminine or androgenous sides as well. no biggy.
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Belmont hill Mitt wrote: <quoted text> you wernt looking long and hard enough ..... if that thing went off, it would take the top of obama's head off!! I find it offensive, because they planned it that way. I looked at it trying to see how they were seeing it and it looks to be pointing to the pole. The gun looks like a symbol of the gun as what they are refering to.Not a gun in action.
|
|
Belmont hill Mitt
Anderson, CA
|
Hey wrote: <quoted text> Wow...And you would miss all this if Uncle Ron took it all away? They are 1 percenters. I wouldnt miss it if Obama or anyone took it all away, and redistributed much of it through work programs to repower and rebuild this country. Ron paul isnt going to ever be in a position to take anything away, because he only garners 10% of the republican primary vote. ron paul doesnt want to rebuid america, that is too expensive for the imagination of ron paul.
|
|
Belmont hill Mitt
Anderson, CA
|
Hey wrote: <quoted text> I think he is against the NDAA And getting molested at the airport. Some how this dumbo made it through medical school.When I would see him in debates with the others they are always smirking and laughing at him and I think wow hes the doctor here and they act like they are above him somehow.The jokes on them.Maybe what's so funny to them is he thinks about taking care of people and they think about taking care of themselves. I whole heartedly agree with you about airport security.... Bush left us with a nasty legacy that does little to make things safer. however, I dont agree with you about dr.pauls health care position. he said we should all be taking care of each other....which is correct, but there needs to be hospitals too. in fact, from his response at the debates, I thought that he doesnt really HAVE much of a position. I guess he would agree with me growing my medicinal herbs in my garden to help my ailments..... but government sponsored access to basic care(like anti-biotics)for the poor saves lives...... I dont believe, like dr paul, if you keep people alive who are working age, they will simly become wards of the state. everybody is part of the ecomony.....everybody.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Most of you TEApublicans seem to have been barely aware of what Country you were living in until Bush tanked the economy & you panicked over whether or not you were going to lose some of your money & the Stock Mkt. was going to take a dive, so I don't expect you to even know what I'm talking about in the rest of this Post. But, I remember Lee Harvwy Oswald, John Hinkley, & Squeaky Frome & I think that email is very disturbing & that Rand Paul is an Idiot for endorsing it...among other things he's said & done!
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Belmont hill Mitt wrote: <quoted text> you must not personally have met and gotten to know many lesbians..... ive dated a few. yes many of them try to "wear the pants" but it is because there is a part of them that wants to be as eqaul as possible to men....which is fine, if they balalnce it with their feminine side. just like hetro men have more feminine or androgenous sides as well. no biggy. As I said it is not reguarding domination its more like prissy.Like in the movie Tootsie. But what we couldn't understand was if they prefer their same sex partner why would you pretend to be what your saying you don't want? This makes no sense. My moms cousin was gay.He was a professor at Berkley.Who ever he was with had been with Eddy Fisher.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Belmont hill Mitt wrote: <quoted text> you must not personally have met and gotten to know many lesbians..... ive dated a few. yes many of them try to "wear the pants" but it is because there is a part of them that wants to be as eqaul as possible to men....which is fine, if they balalnce it with their feminine side. just like hetro men have more feminine or androgenous sides as well. no biggy. Mitt, just out of curiousity, why would you date a Lesbian if you're straight?
|
|
crypt keeper patrol
United States
|
Only a desperate democrat would say the gun was pointed at his head.
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
I agree with you about the Herbs.I believe mother natures tonics are from the love of life not profit.These drugs are nothing but poison.They have to come up with something that hasn't existed to get a patent to get the profits.I'm guessing if the universe thought it was a good thing to be here it would be part of lifes system.
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Belmont hill Mitt wrote: <quoted text> I whole heartedly agree with you about airport security.... Bush left us with a nasty legacy that does little to make things safer. however, I dont agree with you about dr.pauls health care position. he said we should all be taking care of each other....which is correct, but there needs to be hospitals too. in fact, from his response at the debates, I thought that he doesnt really HAVE much of a position. I guess he would agree with me growing my medicinal herbs in my garden to help my ailments..... but government sponsored access to basic care(like anti-biotics)for the poor saves lives...... I dont believe, like dr paul, if you keep people alive who are working age, they will simly become wards of the state. everybody is part of the ecomony.....everybody. I don't agree with Dr. Paul because I can tell you from personal experience that there comes a time that, unless you are well trained in the "hands on" Medical Field, you simply don't have the ability or knowledge to care for a Loved One properly, who has certain diseases or conditions associated with aging. It's not fair to them or you to persist after that point because they don't get the care that they deserve & it takes a huge toll on you (the Caregiver). So, it's a lose/lose situation for both of you. If you won't let go & realize what's happening & it cripples your Mind, Body, & Soul, then what good are you to anybody, including them or yourself or your other Family Members who need you just as badly?
|
|
Since: Oct 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
crypt keeper patrol wrote: Only a desperate democrat would say the gun was pointed at his head. And only a TEApublican who's in denial, would say that it isn't.
|
|
Hey
Cookeville, TN
|
Really Sassy wrote: Most of you TEApublicans seem to have been barely aware of what Country you were living in until Bush tanked the economy & you panicked over whether or not you were going to lose some of your money & the Stock Mkt. was going to take a dive, so I don't expect you to even know what I'm talking about in the rest of this Post. But, I remember Lee Harvwy Oswald, John Hinkley, & Squeaky Frome & I think that email is very disturbing & that Rand Paul is an Idiot for endorsing it...among other things he's said & done! Since I'm the only one that has responded to this up to this point I'm assuming you believe I'm a tea pub, and I am not.I have no party and i'm happy with that.In fact I lean more to the dems but I see some things republican that seem reasonable also.I like Bernie Sanders and agree with him alot. As far as the gun it looks like when a gun hangs on a rack.I honestly did not pick that up from that picture.If I felt it did I'd say so and I'd be offended.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|