Is the Pres. a muslim?

This was emailed to me. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup...

Are you a racist? Your posts seem to indicate that.

Wow! He sure sounds like a Muslim to me....Thats scary!

President Obama sure didn't sound very mad at the Muslim guy that killed all those people at Ft Hood yesterday, either.

Carrie wrote:

Wow! He sure sounds like a Muslim to me....Thats scary!
President Obama sure didn't sound very mad at the Muslim guy that killed all those people at Ft Hood yesterday, either.

Well Dennis, you didn't want to news conference very closely then, he was very upset.

Say, why are you calling "Jerry" on Ch. 2(the guy on the porch) Harv for? Is Harv in your wee little mind 24/7

Er, Carrie. You've posed as a female before, we know its YOU, DENNIS!

Watch, not want, before I get called Vanderbilt

Desperation runs deep in republican circles.
Couldn't happen to a more worthless group.

I don't know who you think I am, but I can assure you my name isn't Dennis. If you don't like my posts, don't read them. If you think I'm a sock puppet, then ignore me. I could care less. Loser.

Carrie wrote:

I don't know who you think I am, but I can assure you my name isn't Dennis. If you don't like my posts, don't read them. If you think I'm a sock puppet, then ignore me. I could care less. Loser.

Dennis, they don't have an ignore feature, but maybe they'll upgrade the site and insitute one. You'll be the FIRST one on the ignore list. I will let you know when it happens

In the Muslim religion if you are born the off spring of a muslim, you are a muslim.

Leons a nut wrote:

Are you a racist? Your posts seem to indicate that.

That the first thing people say when you opose Obama and I sick of it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

It's true however.

Yes they all play the race card when you are against Obama's issues he is pushing. Obama has too many radical handlers in the White House.

I had thought that The United States of America was
a counry founded on freedom of religion and from
religion.

Even if President Obama were a Muslim, does it really matter as long he does the job he's supposed
to do as President of the United States?

It seems to me that there were those that questioned John F. Kennedy's membership in the
Catholic Churh too.

So, to which religion, or faith should a President of the United States belong?

BabaLouie wrote:

I had thought that The United States of America was
a counry founded on freedom of religion and from
religion.
Even if President Obama were a Muslim, does it really matter as long he does the job he's supposed
to do as President of the United States?
It seems to me that there were those that questioned John F. Kennedy's membership in the
Catholic Churh too.
So, to which religion, or faith should a President of the United States belong?

The original poster is a racist. Just ignore the $hitstain, Baba. Rambo aka Activist aka 50 other socks is just a loser in life

BabaLouie,

I agree with you, however when anyone let's their religion jade their ability to lead effectively or with an ideaology it can become dangerous. Case in point the following is from a post I put up earlier. What was obama's reason not only for this appointment but the others he has made.

November 07, 2009
The New Iran Man at the State Department's Iran Desk
By Ed Lasky

John Limbert will be the senior Iran official at the State Department, replacing Dennis Ross who has moved to the National Security Council (and who has not been heard of publicly since). Should America be concerned? Yes. Limbert is not a neutral arbiter; he serves on the advisory board of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), widely considered to be the de facto lobby for the Iranian regime in America.

What is the National Iranian American Council?

The Council serves as the blocking back for the Iranian regime in America, opposes sanctions on Iran, soft-peddles any controversial events in Iran, and counsels "patience" regarding Iran's stance towards its nuclear program; the NIAC has been at the forefront of lobbying against continued Congressional funding of the Voice of America Persia service; Radio Farad; and grants for Iranian civil society; the NIAC adamantly opposes any military attacks on Iran; and to top it off, the NIAC has reportedly received funding from anti-Israel advocate George Soros who, at the very least, was an honored guest and speaker at one its symposiums (he called for a more equitable Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and called for America to renounce regime change as a goal).

The NIAC adamantly opposes any military attacks on Iran. In other words, it all but serves as Iran's Embassy in Washington-though the NIAC vociferously dispute this characterization. However, there is very little sunlight between the views of the regime and the NIAC.

Hey, I wouldn't mind it a bit if some of this flabby fat female flesh was hid a little bit, especially those big waddling butts and sagging swinging tits that I don't want to see no more inside these local Kroger stores. These big and nasty tattooed body-pierced whores ought to be forced to cover themselves under burkas and chadors.

Islam isn't just a religion. It can not be separated from politics. So not only is it a religion and a political system it is a mental disorder.

And they say once a muslim, always a muslim.

Verum Quod Sapientia wrote:

BabaLouie,
I agree with you, however when anyone let's their religion jade their ability to lead effectively or with an ideaology it can become dangerous. Case in point the following is from a post I put up earlier. What was obama's reason not only for this appointment but the others he has made.
November 07, 2009
The New Iran Man at the State Department's Iran Desk
By Ed Lasky
John Limbert will be the senior Iran official at the State Department, replacing Dennis Ross who has moved to the National Security Council (and who has not been heard of publicly since). Should America be concerned? Yes. Limbert is not a neutral arbiter; he serves on the advisory board of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), widely considered to be the de facto lobby for the Iranian regime in America.
What is the National Iranian American Council?
The Council serves as the blocking back for the Iranian regime in America, opposes sanctions on Iran, soft-peddles any controversial events in Iran, and counsels "patience" regarding Iran's stance towards its nuclear program; the NIAC has been at the forefront of lobbying against continued Congressional funding of the Voice of America Persia service; Radio Farad; and grants for Iranian civil society; the NIAC adamantly opposes any military attacks on Iran; and to top it off, the NIAC has reportedly received funding from anti-Israel advocate George Soros who, at the very least, was an honored guest and speaker at one its symposiums (he called for a more equitable Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and called for America to renounce regime change as a goal).
The NIAC adamantly opposes any military attacks on Iran. In other words, it all but serves as Iran's Embassy in Washington-though the NIAC vociferously dispute this characterization. However, there is very little sunlight between the views of the regime and the NIAC.

Honestly, one can do a search and find a number of Republicans, and
Democrats that serve, or have served, as lobbyists for other countries! Does that make them traitors? Does that make them Un-American?

I'm sure that almost every President has, in some way, lobbied for
another country. Presidents are lobbied by foreign countries every day. Sometimes they give in to the wishes of these lobbyists, sometimes they don't! Even President Bush (W), had strong ties with
the Bin Laden family, however that doesn't make him a traitor.

James Baker represented the Saudi Prince when they were sued by
the families of those murdered during 911! Does that make him a traitor? Does that make him a bad person?

Attorney's for the Saudi Princes asserted that their clients enjoyed diplomatic immunity,and were therefore immune from any criminal, or civil proceedings. Personally, in my humble opinion,
no one has, or should have, diplomatic immunity from an action such as 911. How can dimplomatic immunity apply to anyone that
attacks a country?

One could do a search and find the same kinds of instances where
Democrats did the same thing.

John Limbert may have some input, but his word is not the final word when it comes to Iran, and so far, I don't think anyone has seen any instances of Mr. Lambert having a major affect on National Policy in regards to Iran.

Bill Clinton was a lobbyist for Dubai!