Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

“I’ll just tell you this, if this passes and it’s five years from now and all that stuff gets implemented—I am leaving the country. I’ll go to Costa Rica.”
—Rush Limbaugh on President Obama’s health care law, 2010

Promises, promises...

Justice Department won’t prosecute Attorney General Holder for contempt of Congress

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department declared Friday that Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision to withhold information about a bungled gun-tracking operation from Congress does not constitute a crime and he won’t be prosecuted for contempt of Congress.

The House voted Thursday afternoon to find Holder in criminal and civil contempt for refusing to turn over the documents. President Barack Obama invoked his executive privilege authority and ordered Holder not to turn over materials about executive branch deliberations and internal recommendations.

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, the department said that it will not bring the congressional contempt citation against Holder to a federal grand jury and that it will take no other action to prosecute the attorney general.

Dan the Man wrote:

Justice Department won’t prosecute Attorney General Holder for contempt of Congress
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department declared Friday that Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision to withhold information about a bungled gun-tracking operation from Congress does not constitute a crime and he won’t be prosecuted for contempt of Congress.
The House voted Thursday afternoon to find Holder in criminal and civil contempt for refusing to turn over the documents. President Barack Obama invoked his executive privilege authority and ordered Holder not to turn over materials about executive branch deliberations and internal recommendations.
In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, the department said that it will not bring the congressional contempt citation against Holder to a federal grand jury and that it will take no other action to prosecute the attorney general.

This post is 100% plagiarized text that provides no source link or attribution. danny BOY stole it and attached his name to the work of others.

This poster is an habitual plagiarist too stupid to reword what he reads and too dishonest to cite its source.

danny BOY the racist.

danny BOY the pathological liar.

danny BOY the plagiarist.

You go BOY!

Mississippi Tea Party Chairman Calls For Open Rebellion Against Federal Government After Obamacare Ruling

Of all the right-wing meltdowns following yesterday’s decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, this statement put out by the chairman of the Mississippi Tea Party may take the cake:

"When a gang of criminals subvert legitimate government offices and seize all power to themselves without the real consent of the governed their every act and edict is of itself illegal and is outside the bounds of the Rule of Law. In such cases submission is treason. Treason against the Constitution and the valid legitimate government of the nation to which we have pledged our allegiance for years. To resist by all means that are right in the eyes of God is not rebellion or insurrection, it is patriotic resistance to invasion.

May all of us fall on our faces before the Heavenly Judge, repent of our sins, and humbly cry out to Him for mercy on our country. And, may godly courageous leaders rise up in His wisdom and power to lead us in displacing the criminal invaders from their seats and restore our constitutional republic."

Despite Nicholson’s repeated charge that the Obama administration is guilty of high crimes, the only treason in play here is the suggestion of an open revolt against the federal government.

Nicholson’s hardly the first Tea Partier to demand that people rise up in opposition to President Obama, in fact he’s not even the first to do so this week.

Matthew Davis, an attorney and former Michigan Republican Party spokesman, wrote yesterday that citizens might be justified taking up armed rebellion. In an email moments after the ruling with the subject line “Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?” Davis wrote “There are times government has to do things to get what it wants and holds a gun to your head. I’m saying at some point, we have to ask the question when do we turn that gun around and say no and resist.”

Dan the Man wrote:

Mississippi Tea Party Chairman Calls For Open Rebellion Against Federal Government After Obamacare Ruling
Of all the right-wing meltdowns following yesterday’s decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, this statement put out by the chairman of the Mississippi Tea Party may take the cake:
"When a gang of criminals subvert legitimate government offices and seize all power to themselves without the real consent of the governed their every act and edict is of itself illegal and is outside the bounds of the Rule of Law. In such cases submission is treason. Treason against the Constitution and the valid legitimate government of the nation to which we have pledged our allegiance for years. To resist by all means that are right in the eyes of God is not rebellion or insurrection, it is patriotic resistance to invasion.
May all of us fall on our faces before the Heavenly Judge, repent of our sins, and humbly cry out to Him for mercy on our country. And, may godly courageous leaders rise up in His wisdom and power to lead us in displacing the criminal invaders from their seats and restore our constitutional republic."
Despite Nicholson’s repeated charge that the Obama administration is guilty of high crimes, the only treason in play here is the suggestion of an open revolt against the federal government.
Nicholson’s hardly the first Tea Partier to demand that people rise up in opposition to President Obama, in fact he’s not even the first to do so this week.
Matthew Davis, an attorney and former Michigan Republican Party spokesman, wrote yesterday that citizens might be justified taking up armed rebellion. In an email moments after the ruling with the subject line “Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?” Davis wrote “There are times government has to do things to get what it wants and holds a gun to your head. I’m saying at some point, we have to ask the question when do we turn that gun around and say no and resist.”

This post is 100% plagiarized text that provides no source link or attribution. danny BOY stole it and attached his name to the work of others.

This poster is an habitual plagiarist too stupid to reword what he reads and too dishonest to cite its source.

danny BOY the racist.

danny BOY the pathological liar.

danny BOY the plagiarist.

You go BOY!

Ted wrote:

<quoted text>
This post is 100% plagiarized text that provides no source link or attribution. danny BOY stole it and attached his name to the work of others.
This poster is an habitual plagiarist too stupid to reword what he reads and too dishonest to cite its source.
danny BOY the racist.
danny BOY the pathological liar.
danny BOY the plagiarist.
You go BOY!

Does it hurt when you talk out of your ass? You do it all the time, so I'm just wondering.

Stop the Stupid!

Whether you want to call the ACA health care mandate a tax or not is mainly a semantic point. It’s a penalty or tax or perhaps a tax penalty on people who refuse to purchase health insurance, even after they received subsidies that make it possible. But Republicans are now saying it’s the ‘biggest tax increase in history’— either of America or the universe of whatever. But this is demonstrably false.

The Congressional Budget Office says the mandate penalty will raise $27 billion between 2012 and 2021.$27 billion over a decade. Anybody who cares to can do the math.

But if you want to call it a ‘tax increase’— which is debatable — it’s clearly one of tiniest ones in history.

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

sez

But if you want to call it a ‘tax increase’— which is debatable — it’s clearly one of tiniest ones in history.

..........

WSJ CHIEF ECONOMIST:

75% OF OBAMACARE COSTS WILL FALL ON BACKS OF THOSE MAKING LESS THAN $120K A YEAR

By: Jim Hoft
6/30/2012 11:44 AM

Take Your Medicine, America…

Stephen Moore, Senior Economics Writer with the Wall Street Journal, told FOX and Friends this morning that nearly 75% of Obamacare costs will fall on the backs of those Americans making less than $120,000 a year.

“It’s a big punch in the stomach to middle class families.”

Obamacare: It’s not just a big f***ing deal…

It’s a big f***ing tax.

Of course… Back in 2008 Barack Obama told supporters heath care should never be purchased “with tax increases on middle class families.”

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/06/30/wsj-chi...

Dan the Man wrote:

Stop the Stupid!
Whether you want to call the ACA health care mandate a tax or not is mainly a semantic point. It’s a penalty or tax or perhaps a tax penalty on people who refuse to purchase health insurance, even after they received subsidies that make it possible. But Republicans are now saying it’s the ‘biggest tax increase in history’— either of America or the universe of whatever. But this is demonstrably false.
The Congressional Budget Office says the mandate penalty will raise $27 billion between 2012 and 2021.$27 billion over a decade. Anybody who cares to can do the math.
But if you want to call it a ‘tax increase’— which is debatable — it’s clearly one of tiniest ones in history.

This post is 100% plagiarized text that provides no source link or attribution. danny BOY stole it and attached his name to the work of others.

This poster is an habitual plagiarist too stupid to reword what he reads and too dishonest to cite its source.

danny BOY the racist.

danny BOY the pathological liar.

danny BOY the plagiarist.

You go BOY!

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Does it hurt when you talk out of your ass? You do it all the t
ime, so I'm just wondering.

mmmmm, talks out his arse, mmmmmm nothing like an arse BJ. I am all dressed sexy, think he would give me an arse BJ? Righ wing arse BJ's re the best. They are so uptight!!!

All according to a racist moronic warrior for the tea bagger class, so shocking.

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

sez

But if you want to call it a ‘tax increase’— which is debatable — it’s clearly one of tiniest ones in history.

..........

WSJ CHIEF ECONOMIST:

75% OF OBAMACARE COSTS WILL FALL ON BACKS OF THOSE MAKING LESS THAN $120K A YEAR

By: Jim Hoft
6/30/2012 11:44 AM

Take Your Medicine, America…

Stephen Moore, Senior Economics Writer with the Wall Street Journal, told FOX and Friends this morning that nearly 75% of Obamacare costs will fall on the backs of those Americans making less than $120,000 a year.

“It’s a big punch in the stomach to middle class families.”

Obamacare: It’s not just a big f***ing deal…

It’s a big f***ing tax.

Of course… Back in 2008 Barack Obama told supporters heath care should never be purchased “with tax increases on middle class families.”

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/06/30/wsj-chi ...

OBAMA IN 2008 PROMISED HEALTH CARE SHOULD

“NEVER BE PURCHASED WITH TAX INCREASES ON MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES”

By: Jim Hoft

7/1/2012 05:56 PM

At a campaign stop on October 4, 2008, Barack Obama told supporters that health care should not purchased with a tax increase.

Health care should never be purchased with tax increases on middle class families.”

Via Free Republic:

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/07/01/obama-i...

..........

"LIAR"

I, I, I, I, I'm, I'm a warrior for the middle class.

I'm happy to fight for the middle class,"

“First Gay President”

With A Little Rainbow Halo Over His Head.

Aaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa, ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha

D Trump wrote:

<quoted text>
Stop all wars.........useless wars that the rich profit on...

Exactly, including this 'War on Drugs'

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

sez

But if you want to call it a ‘tax increase’— which is debatable — it’s clearly one of tiniest ones in history.

..........

You're a Liar again

..........

Video:

Obama in 2009

‘The Economy is My Responsibility’–

Obama in 2011

‘The Economy is Shared Responsibility’

August 5, 2011

In 2009 President Obama said the economy is his responsibility.

That’s when he was swimming in stimulus.

Fast forward to 2011 – now that things haven’t worked out the way he planned he’s singing a different tune.

Now the responsibility for the economy is shared. Watch:

http://lonelyconservative.com/2011/08/video-o ...

The flipper supported a tax increase into law with the flippercare mandate and tea baggers hate that fact. The flipper hate the tea baggers as much as supreme court

Really wrote:

<quoted text>
You prefer corporate theft?!

Of course not, most corporate theft occurs with some type of government assistance - SUCh AS OBAMACARE - forcing individuals to buy insurance off the crony health care companies, or the IRS will come knocking on your door.

They won't even need collect departments, Uncle Sam will do their collecting on OUR dime.

Just like GM - privatize profits and socialize debt.

Look at it "Dan the Man" dipshit!!!!!!

Why can't you wingnuts take responsibility?

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

sez

But if you want to call it a ‘tax increase’— which is debatable — it’s clearly one of tiniest ones in history.

..........

OBAMA IN 2008 PROMISED HEALTH CARE SHOULD

“NEVER BE PURCHASED WITH TAX INCREASES ON MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES”

By: Jim Hoft

7/1/2012 05:56 PM

At a campaign stop on October 4, 2008, Barack Obama told supporters that health care should not purchased with a tax increase.

Health care should never be purchased with tax increases on middle class families.”

Via Free Republic:

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/07/01/obama-i ...

..........

WTF????????

Look Romney is not the answer. Obama is not the answer, 99% of the DEMs and GOP are bought and paid for by megabank multinational corporate interest.

They are hellbent on destroying the middle class, your civil rights, your health, and controlling every aspect of your life - it is right in your face.

The 'Life of Julia?'

Obamacare? The government cares so much about your health, but won't require GMO labeling, ban BPA, or quit subsidizing the corn (Monsanto Cargill) interest?

The police state - drones and red light cameras - machine enforcing the law to collect the rest of the $$ they aren't getting from taxes.

Corporate profits at an all time high, while wages as a % of GPD are at an all time low?