Elevated argument - Hawaii News

Grinchie wrote:

<quoted text>
Bring it on. We know that you are nothing other than a pitiful little ****.

Wildman wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok, you got it!...Your an infinite loss of mental distress..you're ambition to escalate irrelevence to the issue of being a "wanna be". Yet, you seem to be arrogant towards cirtizism of your viewpoint. This by far shows lack of authority, thus you seem to think it doesn't. I had interpeted many factors to your reasoning of comments from distrubed to resistance..in factly speaking, i had concluded to the fact that your arrogance led up to the findings of unreasonable characteristics of a person who had lost in the past of financial support or a financial investment in a Business deal or Market...Thus, It shows clearly to those who are acquainted to such facts...or intellegent enough to read the true descriptions that some cannot recongnize what is being said...a blind side of their logical thinnking becomes ilogical and distorted...as their weaker side of their subconscience relates the true meaning behind the words...Your effortless daunting of trying hard has let your inner thoughts become exposed...you had a financial loss in the past and in efforts trying to resort to a barrage of comments to flow freely without just reasoning. thus, you contemplate on the objective of trying to establish authority where you had lost it some time ago or have not been able to exercise this opportunity...or had none at all...yet, your loss in some way has gotten you to endure and project the past of your losses to others...this should be a red flag to anyone whose determined to relish your comments without just or substantial factual evidence or insight....the most vunerable are the ones who are least educated or not as intellegent enough to foresee a hidden side of the comments that are indept of its real perspective or motive.....Wildman

Wildman wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok, you got it!...Your an infinite loss of mental distress..you're ambition to escalate irrelevence to the issue of being a "wanna be". Yet, you seem to be arrogant towards cirtizism of your viewpoint. This by far shows lack of authority, thus you seem to think it doesn't. I had interpeted many factors to your reasoning of comments from distrubed to resistance..in factly speaking, i had concluded to the fact that your arrogance led up to the findings of unreasonable characteristics of a person who had lost in the past of financial support or a financial investment in a Business deal or Market...Thus, It shows clearly to those who are acquainted to such facts...or intellegent enough to read the true descriptions that some cannot recongnize what is being said...a blind side of their logical thinnking becomes ilogical and distorted...as their weaker side of their subconscience relates the true meaning behind the words...Your effortless daunting of trying hard has let your inner thoughts become exposed...you had a financial loss in the past and in efforts trying to resort to a barrage of comments to flow freely without just reasoning. thus, you contemplate on the objective of trying to establish authority where you had lost it some time ago or have not been able to exercise this opportunity...or had none at all...yet, your loss in some way has gotten you to endure and project the past of your losses to others...this should be a red flag to anyone whose determined to relish your comments without just or substantial factual evidence or insight....the most vunerable are the ones who are least educated or not as intellegent enough to foresee a hidden side of the comments that are indept of its real perspective or motive.....Wildman

Grinchie wrote:

<quoted text>
How about you do something like volunteer changing the dressings of some of the soldiers that were not injured on Rail before you try to come weaseling your way back into humane conversation. What you did was inexcusable, and shows that you are a soulless opportunist, willing to exploit the deaths of three soldiers, sacrificing their lives so you can sit around in your pajamas blogging all day.
You just can't admit that the train is a good thing, and will be a benefit to anyone, because you don't like it, or your leaders have directed you to obscure and deman it's benefit in any way possible.
You arer a digusting individual, most likely a regular on the Free Republic.

Judged:

1

1

1

Wildman wrote:

<quoted text>
Dont change the subject ****...you know it for a fact...you're a loss to the financial world..and you can't get a damm person to listen to you...So what?..
I did my duty period...now get to the real reason why your in this blog...you lied to the public, and your still trying to get out of it!...no deal dumb broad from the mainland!...I know for a fact , you're in OAKLAND SLUB CITY USA...You don't reside in hawaii...and you still try to tell the blog what to do...Why not tell California what to do?...go ahead make an a-- out of yourself!...you can't do it can you?..why, probably because you had a mental problem...and they won't take any mental patients from Oakland in politics....Go ahead show us how your going to fix the problems in California, not hawaii...you Don't reside here...you're a nutcase!...
and you know it!...Wildman

Finally wrote:

Good for you, Braddah Rail Stimulus!
About time someone intelligent posted on this board. Usually all we get are same old blah, blah losers who say "no" to everything.
Post more, RS, we need to hear your voice!

Ping wrote:

<quoted text>But you are "Rail Stimulus," just posting under a different name and location! Why are you responding to your own posts?

Rail Pandemic wrote:

<quoted text>
On the topic of rail fatalities vs. auto fatalities...
http://transit-safety.volpe.dot.gov/Data/sami...
Total Fatalities by transit mode in 2007:
Commuter rail: 124
Heavy rail: 32
Light rail: 32
Buses: 90
Total Fatalities: 288 (+ miscellaneous modes)
Total passenger miles;
Commuter rail: 9,102,553,926
Heavy rail: 4,681,146,806
Light rail: 1,806,248,516
Buses: 17,654,709,436
Fatality rates per 100,000,000 miles:
Cars are rated 1.5
Buses are rated .5
Commuter rail is rated less than 1
Light rail is rated less less than 1
Heavy rail is rated .5
( auto fatalities not included)
Total Fatalities by transit mode in 1998: 286
in 1999: 299
in 2000: 295
in 2001: 267
in 2002: 280
in 2003: 234
in 2004: 248
in 2005: 236
in 2006: 227

Mike wrote:

A 300 percent more chance of death by car on Oahu, whether driving or being hit by one, based on one death per day is now increased to 0.00033 percent (or 3 X 0.0000011 percent). This is still just a sub-1 percent chance of death. Those odds are still good enough for people to take the chance of driving.
Highway safety enhancement are certainly worth every penny since they do help save lives. Again, most people are more than willing to have their tax dollars go to towards these things on Oahu since most people here drive.
Most people do not want to invest $6 billion in a rail system that misses key areas (UH, Waikiki and Ewa Beach) and does not have sufficient parking spaces near rail stops to support West Oahu commuters.
Would you buy an elevator system that stops on the 20th floor of a 30th floor building? Would you buy a house with not even one parking stall?
<quoted text>

How Many Die wrote:

<quoted text>
Even if assumed correct, your calculations do not reflect the societal impacts. They apply only to your individual decision to risk your life.

Mike wrote:

Buses currently go through lots of neighborhoods, yet only about 10 percent of the people here use them, with the other 90 percent choosing to drive. This low usage should be a big red flag.
Do you really think car drivers will want to wait for a feeder bus to take them to the rail station? I doubt it. They would rather drive to a parking structure near the rail station and park their car.
Here's an example: When locals use air travel, most people park their cars at the Honolulu Airport parking lot. They do not catch a bus and get dropped off. Reason is they want access to their cars directly at airports and rail stops. They don't want to be stranded at the rail stops or airports.
This is why parking structures near rail stops are a key component to a successful rail plan. Mufi's plan does not have enough of this important component.
<quoted text>

Simple Really wrote:

It's simple, really.
There was a vote. People voted FOR rail. Elevated, steel wheel rail. There was a vote and the people have spoken.
The rest of you can now shut up. The deal is done. The issue decided. The will of the people has been expressed!

How Many Die wrote:

<quoted text>
Highways are 300% more deadly than rail.

Incorporate this fact in the evaluations.

Judged:

1

1

1

Hanaholo wrote:

<quoted text>
Dear Mufi, Skip the multibilliondollar cost of the rail to nowhere, ride the bus or buckle your seatbelt, fix the roads, and lower our fricken taxes. Thanks