Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

6

6

6

Rules Of Evidence wrote:

<quoted text>
What a lying honor-less bearing false witness phony Christian says! Sorry but it's your mouth that spews forth the lie's and everybody apparently knows this! Still getting those good reviews I see! Nobody cares what you lie about and that is again quite apparent! Move along now psycho boy and take that lithium for your bi-polar problem!

Judged:

6

6

6

God Almighty wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you believe in me?

Judged:

5

5

5

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>You can play with truth and continue your hate of gays, by denying them the rights to treatment, but many gays simply by pass you and your hate. You watch TV shows, how funny. 70,000 gay pedophiles never got on that show, and this is the largest pedophile ring ever.
Homosexuality was at one time categorized as a form of paraphilia.[14] Sigmund Freud and his proponents considered homosexuality and paraphilias to be forms of psychosexual infantilism. In a 1951 symposium discussing psychiatrist Benjamin Karpman's paper "The Sexual Psychopath,"[24] psychiatrist Emil Gutheil said, "Looking back upon my own experience with so-called psychopaths, I find one characteristic they all have in common, and that is their infantilism. Take the man who is a homosexual. In his paraphilia he regresses to the time he was bisexual, that is, to his infantile level."[24]
By the mid-20th century, mental health practitioners began formalizing "deviant sexuality" classifications into categories. Researcher Anil Aggrawal writes that the 1952 first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) specified "the type of the pathological behavior, such as homosexuality, transvestism, pedophilia, fetishism, and sexual sadism, including rape, sexual assault, mutilation)."[25] Originally coded as 000-x63, homosexuality was the top of the classification list (Code 302.0)
DSM-I and DSM-II
In American psychiatry, prior to the publication of the DSM-I, paraphilias were classified as cases of "psychopathic personality with pathologic sexuality". The DSM-I (1952) included sexual deviation as a personality disorder of sociopathic subtype. The only diagnostic guidance was that sexual deviation should have been "reserved for deviant sexuality which [was] not symptomatic of more extensive syndromes, such as schizophrenic or obsessional reactions". The specifics of the disorder were to be provided by the clinician as a "supplementary term" to the sexual deviation diagnosis; examples of this supplementary term provided in the DSM-I included homosexuality, transvestism, pedophilia, fetishism, and sexual sadism, including rape. There were no restrictions in the DSM-I on what this supplementary term could be.[33]
The DSM-II (1968) continued to use the term "sexual deviations", but no longer ascribed them under personality disorders, but rather them alongside them in a broad category titled "personality disorders and certain other nonpsychotic mental disorders". The types of sexual deviations listed in the DSM-II were: sexual orientation disturbance (homosexuality), fetishism, pedophilia, transvestitism (sic), exhibitionism, voyeurism, sadism, masochism, and "other sexual deviation". No definition or examples were provided for "other sexual deviation", but the general category of sexual deviation was meant to describe the sexual preference of individuals that was "directed primarily toward objects other than people of opposite sex, toward sexual acts not usually associated with coitus, or toward coitus performed under bizarre circumstances, as in necrophilia, pedophilia, sexual sadism, and fetishism."[34] Except for the removal of homosexuality from the DSM-III onwards, this definition provided a general standard that has guided specific definitions of paraphilias in subsequent DSM editions, up to DSM-IV-TR.

Judged:

5

5

5

Sue Wee wrote:

<quoted text> A little early to be drinking, ain't it? Your post made no sense.

Judged:

5

5

5

jaybirdlives666 wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you a closet queen?

Judged:

5

5

5

Joe Fortuna wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't it nice what a little more knowledge does, people who understand it, usually change their mind when evidence shows them they were wrong.

Judged:

5

5

5

Joe Fortuna wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't it nice what a little more knowledge does, people who understand it, usually change their mind when evidence shows them they were wrong.

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
No one detests a person who calls homosexuals pedophiles more than me. Growing up, some of the most wonderful teachers, camp counselors, mentors I knew here homosexuals.
Shame on you for restoring to homophobic pedophile baiting to win your point.
That's as low as it gets and perpetuates exactly the kind of stereotypes you say you're against.
Seriously, Joe, you need to shut da fuk up and learn the ropes around before insulting gays and heteros alike.
It's stupidity like yours that causes a lot of the damage gays receive -- not my objection to same sex marriage.
Get a clue.

Judged:

5

5

5

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>So, what about the upcoming DSM-V?
Charles Allen Moser pointed out that this change is not really substantive as DSM-IV already acknowledged a difference between paraphilias and non-pathological but unusual sexual interests, a distinction that is virtually identical to what is being proposed for DSM-5, and it is a distinction that, in practice, has often been ignored.[44] Linguist A. C. Hinderliter argued that "Including some sexual interests—but not others—in the DSM creates a fundamental asymmetry and communicates a negative value judgment against the sexual interests included," and leaves the paraphilias in a situation similar to ego-dystonic homosexuality, which was removed from the DSM because it did not meet the DSM's definition of mental disorder.[45]
Historian and philosopher of science Patrick Singy claims that the DSM-5 is about to drastically loosen the criteria for paraphilias and to make them directly dependent on cultural values. The DSM-5 will then be closer to the DSM-I and DSM-II than to their successors, which all were at least trying to separate the concept of "mental disorder" from cultural norms, and which made "harm" or "distress" a necessary condition for having a mental disorder.
In other words, since homosexuality is not a social norm, it will be reclassified as a mental disorder and not as normative behavior, such as was the case with the DSM-1 & DSM-11.

Judged:

6

6

6

No Choice wrote:

Another gay is born, every time a child is abused.

Judged:

6

6

6

Rules Of Evidence wrote:

<quoted text>
Another idiot is born every time you post!

Judged:

6

5

5

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>We need to simplify what you have tried to complicate. Has there ever been an abomination that was pleasing to God?

Judged:

6

5

5

Conservative Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't write this, so please cite your source. Otherwise, this is plain Plagiarism.

Judged:

6

5

5

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>We need to simplify what you have tried to complicate. Has there ever been an abomination that was pleasing to God?

Judged:

6

5

5

DoctorTrannyBasher BASHER wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny who that works, at least with people who are not pursuing an agenda fueled by hate and ignorance.
ELH.

Judged:

6

5

5

DoctorTrannyBasher BASHER wrote:

Oops! Maybe HIS wife should start using birth control.
and OMG! I better stop posting now...

Judged:

6

5

5

Conservative Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Rose. How are you darling? Happy belated Valentines. Did you and your wife do anything special?
I took mine to see Andrea Bocelli live in concert last night. Had awesome (read $$$$$$) seats and the concert was simply breathtaking.
Talk to you later babe. Got to go pick up my daughter.

Judged:

8

7

7

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
But YOU come here to spread the "good news",love and understanding. Why are you a bigot and a hater?