Of course you hold him to the highest esteem, whatever that is supposed to mean.
That comes as no surprise. I think all officers that know or work with him feel that way too.
That is because civilians and their rights have no value to you. Or to the police department in this story. Otherwise medals wouldnt be handed out in a shooting where an innocent bystander is shot by a stray police bullet. I think it would be more appropriate if deadly force was justified, but not used, and nobody got hurt, to earn medal of valor.
But thats just me.
I understand some of you frown on not taking advantage of shooting somebody mentally challenged that is holding a screwdriver, although I disagree that it should result in a promotion.
That is probably because I dont have all the special training and weapons and back up as you though.
It bothers you that some people dont appreciate the abuse, or your support for it, doesnt it?
Your statements show your lack of concern for the people of this country.
Hopefully your not in a position where your hostility for the public causes too many problems for everybodys sake.
Maybe you can find a position working with something you care about instead of people you dont.
Hawaiian Criminal Law wrote:
I have known Officer Kang for over 15 years and have always held him to the highest esteem. He has always conducted himself honorably and I hold great respect for him.