Barack Obama, our next President

Melman68 wrote:

<quoted text>
So, to justify your lack of any argument or denial of what I said was true or untrue or anything regarding attacks on Christianity in America; you call yourself a devout Christian, state you don’t want a theocracy and call me a hard-liner. Is that supposed to somehow shut me up and make me believe you are anything but a liberal sympathizer? I know exactly who Helping Hands Faith in Action is and what they do in the community and how they get funding. I volunteered with them for years, helping our elderly community until their public funding was cut off. Still to the point, why is it muslim, gay and lesbian groups, abortionist and just about anyone against Christianity can get federal support and tax payer funding? If you quote a bible scripture which states homosexuality is wrong, you are labeled a bigot. You invade a Christian church service and desecrate their holy symbols; you are labeled a hero and a revolutionary. Since you are so devout, what preacher, pastor, or priest teaches Christianity is not the “true” faith? You are not fooling anyone on this site. Again I ask, why do liberals lie and try to deceive to push their agenda?

Seems you are the one with the agenda. People can practice their faith they way they wish, no need to push yourself on anyone. It's not only the rightwingers who are Christians, or religious. Some people don't feel the need to pound their chests and wave their bibles around and make self righteous proclamations.

Demos wrote:

<quoted text>
If I fart in bed I blame the dog; Nobama blames Obama.

Laughing! Everyone blames their dogs!! Poor dogs get a "bum" rap!

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>Well, it's easy to focus only the muslims; but that would be a mistake. There are plenty of home grown fringe groups with a violent agenda as well. I believe it must be difficult to live in the Western world if you are a devout muslim. Often wonder why they choose to.

Last week when I flew out of Bradley Airport they had a new TSA toy. While your carry-ons, shoes and coats are being x-rayed they have a new chamber that only men were directed to step into. I thought it was the standard metal detector but when I got into it I was told to stop and wait while little nozzles somewhere blew air all around my body. It was to sniff out explosives and detect metal. Had I been aware of what was happening I would of treated them (pfftt) to a trace of methane to ponder. No similar TSA equipment at McCarran Airport.

Melman68 wrote:

<quoted text>
I know you want to lie and decive and spin me as some right wing, gun loving, hate monger but I am not. IT WAS NOT HALLOWEEN, I CAN'T SEE ANYWHERE IN THE STORY (YOU SENT ME) HE HAD ANY MALICE TOWARD THE BOY!!!! If could be proven the man shot the boy intentionally he should be arrested and executed. What were the circumstances, did the man have an encounter with home invasion, was he attacked or robbed before, what exactly were the boys doing in his yard that late at night?!?!?!? Stop trying to rationalize this into some bullshit emotional statement that guns are evil and need to be banned. I feel sorry for the boy and his family but place some blame on the boy for being there and causing the situation!!!!

Obviously you are not a parent, and obviously you are a gun toter. Nevertheless, this happened in my town 5 years ago, it was Halloween night, the boys played the game "ding dong ditch" on the home owner, the home owner came out to his yard, naked, with his gun and shot the kid in the back as the kid was running from the yard. He died instantly. Should the boys have not done it, yes, you are right about that, however, who hasn't done this as a kid? You don't expect to get shot in the back and killed. That is why we have police, if we feel threatened, don't open the door and call 911. This was in a very nice residential no crime neighborhood.

Grampy wrote:

<quoted text>
Last week when I flew out of Bradley Airport they had a new TSA toy. While your carry-ons, shoes and coats are being x-rayed they have a new chamber that only men were directed to step into. I thought it was the standard metal detector but when I got into it I was told to stop and wait while little nozzles somewhere blew air all around my body. It was to sniff out explosives and detect metal. Had I been aware of what was happening I would of treated them (pfftt) to a trace of methane to ponder. No similar TSA equipment at McCarran Airport.

Next time eat beans before you go!!!

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>True and interesting point. Wondered why Al Gore chose him. thought it was a mistake then.

Gore picked him because he was the only Democrat he could find that was a more annoying speaker than himself.

judi123 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're the moron. obama will NOT be re-elected in 2012, and he may be impeached for his anti-American actions before that.....The experiment has failed!!!!!

Real quick, WHAT anti-American actions are you talking about? And don't be vague, we are talking about an impeachment here. What impeachable offense has Obama committed? Be specific!

Fast_69_Z28 wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again Lily is wrong. He DID go to jail for manslaughter.
The man pleaded guilty to manslaughter, served his time according to the plea bargain.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/palm-beach/w...
A year later and just as opening arguments were to begin at Levin's manslaughter trial, he pleaded guilty to manslaughter with a firearm. The plea deal called for 10 years' probation, 1,250 hours of community service and a year of "short weekends" in jail — 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. The agreement also contained a clause stating Levin could ask to terminate the probation early if he successfully satisfied the terms after five years. On Friday he did just that.

http://judicial-inc.biz/Boca_teenager_shot.ht...

Made a mistake, I really thought it had been Halloween night, nevertheless, it was a tragedy. He was the family's only child.

Grampy wrote:

<quoted text>
Gore picked him because he was the only Democrat he could find that was a more annoying speaker than himself.

Laughing my head off!!

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>Obviously you are not a parent, and obviously you are a gun toter. Nevertheless, this happened in my town 5 years ago, it was Halloween night, the boys played the game "ding dong ditch" on the home owner, the home owner came out to his yard, naked, with his gun and shot the kid in the back as the kid was running from the yard. He died instantly. Should the boys have not done it, yes, you are right about that, however, who hasn't done this as a kid? You don't expect to get shot in the back and killed. That is why we have police, if we feel threatened, don't open the door and call 911. This was in a very nice residential no crime neighborhood.

"Don't open the door and call 911". Do you think a door can be kicked in, in less than 2-3 minutes (if you're lucky the cops can reach you that fast)? All due respect but, I've lived blocks away from 2 home invasions (in 2 different yet, generally safe neighborhoods), that resulted in 1 rape of a teenager while her parents were tied up in the basement, and the murder of another lady. Now the situation you described, is ILLEGAL, it was a criminal act for that nut to shoot a couple of kids for ding-dong ditching him, only an idiot would think otherwise but, also, contrarily, in the 2 situations I described if the homeowners had guns, the criminals would be dead, and the innocent residents would've remained both un-raped, and alive. Now, myself, I'm not terribly enthusiastic about carry and conceal but, I'll be damned if a firearm isn't an excellent choice of tool to defend one's home.

MyTwoCents wrote:

<quoted text>
What do you need to prove? Your statement: "Unless it is about obama, then the site gets locked down." Do you not understand the question?
Now you drag out the second amendment for more chest thumping. So, in your ideal world anyone with a gun whether or not it is a licensed weapon should be allowed to use it for "self defense". Kinda like the wild west, eh?
And you think the murder rate is high now.
>

I have three statements for you:

1. Anyone who has tried to inform the American public about the corrupt, fraud who obama is, have been attacked by all members of the mainstream media, obama's own staff, and several members of congress. Everyone who opposes the messiah, are immediately label racist and denounced as not supporting him because he is black. I you try to deny that, you are a true liberal kool-aid drinker and not worth my time. I am American Indian and I don't give a rat's ass about what color the man's skin is, I care about his character. What he and his staff are doing is criminal and unconstitutional. He is no better than bush but at least he didn't use the power of the federal government smear and instill fear into his opposition. If the average American had known what obama was about and if he had been truthful during his campaign, he would not have made it out of the primaries.
2. Wikipedia did shut down its site about obama because it did not want lies and untruths to be posted. That didn’t stop them in regards to bush or cheney and how is obama’s long term relationship with bill aryes and Jeremiah wright a lie? Why are he and the liberals after Fox news and trying to limit their access his staff? Why are the liberals trying to shut down conservative talk radio when they have all major news networks, most of the cable news shows and the vast majority of print media?
3. My 2nd amendment right is just that, my right. We do not have the Wild West nor do I want it that way, which is why we have laws. If the liberal courts would uphold and enforce our current laws, there would be less crime but currently a gang-banger gets caught with an illegal weapon or someone goes onto a military post and murders people in cold blood with dozens of witnesses, your liberal president, press and leader ship immediately jump to the defense of the criminal and make excuses for them. Compare crime rates to cities with strict gun control laws against its legal citizens vs. those where guns are allowed. You will notice the gun control cities have crime rates vastly higher than those with no gun laws and very few legal gun owners use their guns to commit a crime. FBI facts if you don’t believe it check.

Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
"Don't open the door and call 911". Do you think a door can be kicked in, in less than 2-3 minutes (if you're lucky the cops can reach you that fast)? All due respect but, I've lived blocks away from 2 home invasions (in 2 different yet, generally safe neighborhoods), that resulted in 1 rape of a teenager while her parents were tied up in the basement, and the murder of another lady. Now the situation you described, is ILLEGAL, it was a criminal act for that nut to shoot a couple of kids for ding-dong ditching him, only an idiot would think otherwise but, also, contrarily, in the 2 situations I described if the homeowners had guns, the criminals would be dead, and the innocent residents would've remained both un-raped, and alive. Now, myself, I'm not terribly enthusiastic about carry and conceal but, I'll be damned if a firearm isn't an excellent choice of tool to defend one's home.

Well, there was no winning in that situation; but, it was certainly a shock to the community and everyone with kids had to tell their kids not to ever do that ding dong ditch, ever. You never know what is behind the door, if the person is mentally unbalanced, has enemies, suffereing from paranoia, etc. kids don't understand that, they think it's funny; till a 16 year old died. The law changed here in Florida, if you feel threatened, it's shoot first, ask questions later; it can lead to a cowboy like mentality.

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>Seems you are the one with the agenda. People can practice their faith they way they wish, no need to push yourself on anyone. It's not only the rightwingers who are Christians, or religious. Some people don't feel the need to pound their chests and wave their bibles around and make self righteous proclamations.

I don't remember pushing my religion on anyone or waving my bible or pounding my chest. She was impling I was some neocon because I didn't share her worldly views and it is very obvious you have no problem with the current attacks on anything christian or christian based either. I don't care if you worship the moon and the stars the great thing about christianity is free will. I refuse to remain silent anymore.

Grampy wrote:

<quoted text>
Last week when I flew out of Bradley Airport they had a new TSA toy. While your carry-ons, shoes and coats are being x-rayed they have a new chamber that only men were directed to step into. I thought it was the standard metal detector but when I got into it I was told to stop and wait while little nozzles somewhere blew air all around my body. It was to sniff out explosives and detect metal. Had I been aware of what was happening I would of treated them (pfftt) to a trace of methane to ponder. No similar TSA equipment at McCarran Airport.

Went through a similar device a two or three years ago at West Palm Beach. At that time, there was no gender discrimination, but probably numerous complaints from women who objected to blowing air up their skirt. This is apparently something they are testing, but it is very slow and impractical to screen everyone at a major airport.

Nobama wrote:

Meanwhile, the head of Obama's Army is more concerned about the sensitivities of Muslim soldiers than about safety and security:
General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, said on Sunday that he was concerned that speculation about the religious beliefs of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, accused of killing 12 fellow soldiers and one civilian and wounding dozens of others in a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, could “cause a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers.”
General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, appeared on "Meet the Press'" on Sunday.
“I’ve asked our Army leaders to be on the lookout for that,” General Casey said in an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.“It would be a shame — as great a tragedy as this was — it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.”
General Casey, who was appeared on three Sunday news programs, used almost the same language during an interview on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos,” an indication of the Army’s effort to ward off bias against the more than 3,000 Muslims in its ranks.
“A diverse Army gives us strength,” General Casey, who visited Fort Hood Friday, said on “This Week.”

And Napolitano is working hard to "prevent a backlash" against
muslims.(Isn't she the one who warned law enforcement about all
of the "rightwing" terrorists to look out for back in the spring,
right before that other Muslim extremist shot the two soldiers
at the recruiting office?)

Kind of gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling, doesn't it, to know that
folks like Casey and Napolitano are so busy working their fingers
to the bone keeping us (well, jihadists anyway) safe from harm.

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>Obviously you are not a parent, and obviously you are a gun toter. Nevertheless, this happened in my town 5 years ago, it was Halloween night, the boys played the game "ding dong ditch" on the home owner, the home owner came out to his yard, naked, with his gun and shot the kid in the back as the kid was running from the yard. He died instantly. Should the boys have not done it, yes, you are right about that, however, who hasn't done this as a kid? You don't expect to get shot in the back and killed. That is why we have police, if we feel threatened, don't open the door and call 911. This was in a very nice residential no crime neighborhood.

I am absolutely a parent and teach my kids this is different world than when I was their age. You don't go sneaking around anyone's property after dark. They may have dogs, they may have a security system, they most likely don't want you on their property. During Halloween they know if the lights are off, stay away from the house.

As for Levin I can't find where you claim he came out of the house naked and shot him. If the boy was running away, he had no right to shoot him. Again, I am sorry for the loss of a 16 year old boy.

Nobama wrote:

<quoted text>
Went through a similar device a two or three years ago at West Palm Beach. At that time, there was no gender discrimination, but probably numerous complaints from women who objected to blowing air up their skirt. This is apparently something they are testing, but it is very slow and impractical to screen everyone at a major airport.

Guess you looked suspicious.

Factual wrote:

<quoted text>
And Napolitano is working hard to "prevent a backlash" against
muslims.(Isn't she the one who warned law enforcement about all
of the "rightwing" terrorists to look out for back in the spring,
right before that other Muslim extremist shot the two soldiers
at the recruiting office?)
Kind of gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling, doesn't it, to know that
folks like Casey and Napolitano are so busy working their fingers
to the bone keeping us (well, jihadists anyway) safe from harm.

And what would you do?

Melman68 wrote:

<quoted text>
I am absolutely a parent and teach my kids this is different world than when I was their age. You don't go sneaking around anyone's property after dark. They may have dogs, they may have a security system, they most likely don't want you on their property. During Halloween they know if the lights are off, stay away from the house.
As for Levin I can't find where you claim he came out of the house naked and shot him. If the boy was running away, he had no right to shoot him. Again, I am sorry for the loss of a 16 year old boy.

Apparently I was mistaken, I had remembered the incident and thought it was Halloween, it was the 24th, nevertheless, yes the kids rang the doorbell and ran, the homeowner ran out and shot him in the back. It was a disaster for all, especially the parents of that boy, their only child.

Chuck Schumer,(D)New York wants investigations
into where stimulus funds for renewable energy
are actually going, after finding out that
a wind farm in Texas will actually farm out the
work on the turbines to China (3,000 Chinese
jobs vs. 300 jobs for Americans, most of them
temporary), this when American businesses can
provide the turbines as well as Chinese. This
particular boost to the Chinese economy costs
$849 MILLION in stimulus funds.

Can't wait to see what revelations the Cap 'n
Tax program will bring us.