Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

Why exactly should the government (meaning the taxpayers) fund someone's abortion? If it is for medical issues then yes, it should be covered. If it is because someone just wants an abortion then they should pay themselves. I hope viagra is not covered either. I don't think the taxpayers should pay for someone's viagra either.

Judged:

2

2

2

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
We don't yet know what the wording of the 'final' Bill will be.
If this is the tradeoff-how many more unwanted babies? How many more unsafe abortions? We'll see.

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
It doesn't take any intelligence to hurl insults and spew obscenities. Even a parrot can do that!

Judged:

2

2

1

Moncie wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, we know that Roe v. Wade isn't going away. What these people don't understand is that they've been paying for some abortions already! This is nothing new. I am anxious to see what the Senate does next.

Judged:

2

1

1

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
We don't yet know what the wording of the 'final' Bill will be.
If this is the tradeoff-how many more unwanted babies? How many more unsafe abortions? We'll see.

Judged:

2

2

2

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
If it becomes a NO funding...there are still clinics and it will be ok....
And you're right, this is nothing new-but the Repugnicans don't get the bigger picture WITH ANYTHING!!!(And some Dems too).

Judged:

1

1

1

shovelhead72 wrote:

<quoted text>Very true. Read some of the fundamentalist parrot-posts on the forum, and see how many of them hurl insults, obscenities and threats of eternal damnation or earthly demise. In my view, biker chick is way less of an annoyance than they.

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
I do realize both sides have behaved badly. I just happened to see your post on BC at the top of this page. I don't believe in eternal damnation and no other person can judge others in that way. As for BC, she just runs her mouth like a street punk. So in reality, I just ignore the damnation threats and the insults.
I don't know if we can even trust the government to run our healthcare. They couldn't even help ensure there'd be enough vaccine for their dreaded h1n1 plague.

Judged:

1

1

1

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not a plague and you can blame the pharmaceutical companies.
I think that might be Glaxo and Roche...not the government this time.

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

I also didn't exactly blame the government. I said they "couldn't even help..."

Maxie wrote:

I also didn't exactly blame the government. I said they "couldn't even help..."

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
I used the word plague sarcastically.

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
It doesn't take any intelligence to hurl insults and spew obscenities. Even a parrot can do that!

Judged:

1

1

1

quid pro quo wrote:

<quoted text>
Your posts are proof.

Judged:

1

1

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, Maxie...just my two cents or three.
They (government) couldn't help getting the vaccine to the public any faster.
We all the blame the government for many things-personally, if I could blame Bush for this vaccine screw up, I would..but sadly, I can't :)

Judged:

1

1

1

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
It makes me think of a Seinfeld episode where Kramer was interviewing 3 homeless people for a rickshaw job. One of the homeless just kept shouting, "the government!"
The government does make a convenient scapegoat.

cat wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd have to cheat and google that one.
You're right.does make a convenient scapegoat.
Kramer is no longer everyone's darling....although I am very willing to cut some people slack...he's one and Andre Agassi is another..so far.

Judged:

2

2

1

quid pro quo wrote:

<quoted text>
Your presence alone is an insult.

Judged:

1

1

Maxie wrote:

<quoted text>
Too bad. You don't get to decide who can be here.