Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

Dan the Man wrote:

----------
"Both parties are to blame" is the popular mantra among the MSM and low-information voters when the Congress can't get anything done.
Unfortunately, it's not even remotely true.

Whos opinion is this?

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Roger the Racist would have used the Bible to justify slavery - and he claims I'm the one who doesn't understand it. LMAO!

Slavery is mentioned in the Bible many times. You may be surprised what's in there about it. Don't take it out of context though like to do my posts on here.

Your statement makes no sense at all?

I thought I cleared this up about you calling me a racist. I guess your hate for my ability to rip you a new asshole is really deep.

Since you say I don't understand it then do yourself a favor and explain it to us morons on here or better yet go take a nap or something because you're about to have an aneurysm.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW - any time you'd like to have a legitimate debate on Christianity or the Bible, I'd be happy to oblige. You're making attacks based on something you know nothing about.

Well get started. You lost already. lol

Roger wrote:

<quoted text>
Slavery is mentioned in the Bible many times. You may be surprised what's in there about it. Don't take it out of context though like to do my posts on here.

Like I said - Roger the Racist would have used the Bible to justify slavery. Hell, he still might. Like many Christianists, he's all about distorting the Bible to fit whatever perverse agenda he has.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW - any time you'd like to have a legitimate debate on Christianity or the Bible, I'd be happy to oblige. You're making attacks based on something you know nothing about.

danny BOY, you've proven the depth of your ignorance. Exclaiming "Jesus Christ!" as an expletive is the essence of taking the Lord's name in vain. You are a weaselly liar in trying to defend and justify it.

You, danny BOY, would be the first to cry "Racist!" if someone used "gay!" or "black!" as swear words but you contend it's entirely appropriate to exclaim "Jesus Christ!" in the same manner.

Anyone who finds insulting the president a greater crime than flippantly using Jesus Christ's name in vain has already lost any possible Biblical debate.

You lose, danny BOY.

You are an ignorant hypocrite.

Dan the man is swinging from black nuts.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Like I said - Roger the Racist would have used the Bible to justify slavery. Hell, he still might. Like many Christianists, he's all about distorting the Bible to fit whatever perverse agenda he has.

..........

fake people

A fake person is someone who is not genuine and will do whatever it takes to make themself look good.

They will take credit for other's work or down play the good of others to illuminate oneself.

Fake people take part in hipocrisy, lies, and will turn on friendship the moment it no longer is a benefit for them.

They will change thier personality to fit in to a certain group.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Grow up, liar. I didn't insult Jesus. Using God's name in vain refers to the swearing of oaths.

..........

douchebag

An individual who has an over-inflated sense of self worth,

compounded by a low level of intellegence, behaving ridiculously in

front of colleagues with no sense of how moronic he appears.

Ted wrote:

<quoted text>
danny BOY, you've proven the depth of your ignorance. Exclaiming "Jesus Christ!" as an expletive is the essence of taking the Lord's name in vain. You are a weaselly liar in trying to defend and justify it.
You, danny BOY, would be the first to cry "Racist!" if someone used "gay!" or "black!" as swear words but you contend it's entirely appropriate to exclaim "Jesus Christ!" in the same manner.
Anyone who finds insulting the president a greater crime than flippantly using Jesus Christ's name in vain has already lost any possible Biblical debate.
You lose, danny BOY.
You are an ignorant hypocrite.

False. You obviously don't comprehend the Biblical definition of "taking the Lord's name in vain."

But no surprise you run from a challenge to real debate. I knew you'd be afraid to even try.

But keep floggin' that horse, chickenshit! LOL!

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
There are multiple reasons why African Americans are disproportionately poor in this nation. The existence of the social safety net is not one of them.

..........

dipshit

1. A despised person;

a moron;

an ineffectual person;

one with a habit of being wrong, loudly and often.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
False. You obviously don't comprehend the Biblical definition of "taking the Lord's name in vain."
But no surprise you run from a challenge to real debate. I knew you'd be afraid to even try.
But keep floggin' that horse, chickenshit! LOL!

..........

But no surprise you run from a challenge to real debate.

I knew you'd be afraid to even try.

But keep floggin' that horse, chickenshit!

..........

Dan the Man
Hanover, PA

sez

Really?

It's fair that they pay 10% to 15% while the rest of us pay 30%?

Maybe you don't know the meaning of the word

"fair."

LOL!

..........

c'mon danny boy debate

..........

..........

Federal Income Taxes on Middle-Income Families Remain Near Historic Lows

By Chuck Marr

Updated April 2, 2012

Federal taxes on middle-income Americans are near historic lows,[1] according to the latest available data.

That’s true both for federal income taxes and total federal taxes.[2]

Income taxes:

A family of four in the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 5.6 percent of its 2011 income in federal income taxes, according to a new analysis by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center.[3]

Average income tax rates for these typical families have been lower during the Bush and Obama Administrations than at any time since the 1950s, as Figure 1 shows.

(As discussed below, 2009 and 2010 were particularly low because of the temporary Making Work Pay Tax Credit.)

Overall federal taxes:

Overall federal taxes — which include income as well as payroll and excise taxes — on middle-income households are near their lowest levels in decades, according to the latest data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm ...

DEMOCRAT SCUM

Socialist,Communist,Utopian,Ma rxist

Dan the Man

SCUM-bagger

..........

c'mon danny boy debate

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

chickenshit douchebag !!!!

heres a great place to debate our governemnt:
fantasti.cc

c'mon danny boy debate

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
False. You obviously don't comprehend the Biblical definition of "taking the Lord's name in vain."
But no surprise you run from a challenge to real debate. I knew you'd be afraid to even try.
But keep floggin' that horse, chickenshit! LOL!

Of course, danny BOY! You think YOU are right and Biblical and Christian experts are wrong. Your ignorance of the Bible is for all to see. You appear ridiculous at the lengths you go defending the indefensible.

danny BOY, there is no 'debating' with a liar like you. It's impossible to take seriously anyone who regularly makes comments such as "keep floggin' that horse, chickenshit! LOL!" while using Christ's name as an expletive.

danny BOY, the pathetic pathological liar.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Like I said - Roger the Racist would have used the Bible to justify slavery. Hell, he still might. Like many Christianists, he's all about distorting the Bible to fit whatever perverse agenda he has.

More hate from Dan the Man. Why do you insist on referring to me as a racist? Now you accuse me of distorting the Bible.

Dan, seriously take a look at who you are, what you believe and then tell me you lead a Christian life? Your actions do not show you’re Christian, then again that does not mean you’re not.

If you knew what a Christian was you would know that Christianist as you refer to who distort the Bible are either misinformed or are indeed not Christian at all.

Enough with these child like posts. You’re the one who has mentioned many time how you would like to debate without all the bashing. here is your chance with me. I extend to you the olive branch. It’s now up to you.

I challenge you to show one sentence where I distorted the Bible? I'm only asking for one so that should be very easy since you know all about me.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Grow up, liar. I didn't insult Jesus. Using God's name in vain refers to the swearing of oaths.

Examples of how the Lord's name is used in vain is seen in the exclamatory speech people often use.(An exclamation is defined as, "a sharp utterance of strong feeling...A word of outcry; an interjection" -Webster.) People use exclamatory speech when they are surprised with good or bad or at times when they are angry. Constantly, especially among younger groups, we hear "GOD!" or "JESUS!" used to express their strong feelings about something. GOD and JESUS are names to be used in worship and in teaching, not as exclamatory speech. We show disrespect for our God and Saviour when using His name in such a vain and worthless manner.

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
False. You obviously don't comprehend the Biblical definition of "taking the Lord's name in vain."
But no surprise you run from a challenge to real debate. I knew you'd be afraid to even try.
But keep floggin' that horse, chickenshit! LOL!

..........

I try to keep you on task, but you simply can't bring yourself to back up anything you post with any evidence whatsoever.

I'm starting to think that you CAN'T back up what you post.

I'm starting to think that you just make shit up and run away when confronted with that fact.

I'm starting to think you're nothing more than a cowardly, lying troll.

Once again…

“DAN THE MAN”… has been pummeled by reason and logic

concerning his beliefs in utopian socialism and his

worship of the black messiah.

..........

C'mon RealDave, "what sez ewe"

C'mon RealDave, appear

Come into sight;

become visible or noticeable,

typically without visible agent or apparent cause

..........

..........

C'mon RealDave, appear and protect your "boy"

Roger wrote:

<quoted text>
More hate from Dan the Man. Why do you insist on referring to me as a racist? Now you accuse me of distorting the Bible.
Dan, seriously take a look at who you are, what you believe and then tell me you lead a Christian life? Your actions do not show you’re Christian, then again that does not mean you’re not.
If you knew what a Christian was you would know that Christianist as you refer to who distort the Bible are either misinformed or are indeed not Christian at all.
Enough with these child like posts. You’re the one who has mentioned many time how you would like to debate without all the bashing. here is your chance with me. I extend to you the olive branch. It’s now up to you.
I challenge you to show one sentence where I distorted the Bible? I'm only asking for one so that should be very easy since you know all about me.

You know what? I'm in a generous mood today, so I'm going to humor you.

Roger wrote:

<quoted text>
More hate from Dan the Man. Why do you insist on referring to me as a racist?

Because you post objectively racist things. Repeatedly. Without apology. They are right here for anyone to see:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/west-chester-...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/west-chester-...

Roger wrote:

Dan, seriously take a look at who you are, what you believe and then tell me you lead a Christian life? Your actions do not show you’re Christian, then again that does not mean you’re not.

Yes, I lead a Christian life. Care to tell me how I don't and how you know?

But it was good of you to stop short of judging my salvation. Good for you.

Roger wrote:

If you knew what a Christian was you would know that Christianist as you refer to who distort the Bible are either misinformed or are indeed not Christian at all.

I agree. I use the term "Christianist" as Andrew Sullivan coined it, "I have a new term for those on the fringes of the religious right who have used the Gospels to perpetuate their own aspirations for power, control and oppression: Christianists. They are as anathema to true Christians as the Islamists are to true Islam."

There are many Evangelical Christians who are invested in religion and institution and power who distort the Bible to oppress the weak, manipulate their followers, and to gain political power so they can control other people. They are judgmental, hypocritical, homophobic, racist, and evil. I use Sullivan's term for them - Christianist.

Roger wrote:

I challenge you to show one sentence where I distorted the Bible? I'm only asking for one so that should be very easy since you know all about me.

What I said was the you would have supported the evil of slavery using the Bible. It was speculation based on your overt racism and your claims of being a Christian. Am I wrong?

You claim that the Bible opposes gay marriage. It does not. That's a distortion of what it actually says.

And you earlier claimed that I am not a Christian. You distort the teaching of the Bible to make that claim.

So there you go. I accepted your olive branch and answered your questions.

You're welcome.