Propaganda 101

Mr Jefferson wrote:

<quoted text>
Please conduct you dialogue in such a manner as to reflect positively on The University.

Hampton Handyman wrote:

Sorry those things are the suggestions I made in post 249 that you seem to be ralling against.
You have to look at the problems at hand and try to correct them. If you are tring to slove a problem you can't always back up to before the problem existed and start over. History doesn't have a rewind button.
It is not the place of government to bail out or cap free trade and I believe that they should be bound by the Constitution. But in order to keep this country growing the government should help to grow the free market in trying times. Be it lowing taxes on businesses, softening enviromental laws to allow for cheaper power generation, or helping the unemployeed to survive while they improve their skills so that the country can provide a highly skilled and atractive work force. I also am not opposed to tariffs on imported goods so that we can compete with cheaper labor in less developed counties.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mr Jefferson wrote:

<quoted text>
Please conduct you dialogue in such a manner as to reflect positively on The University.

Judged:

4

4

3

Concerned American wrote:

<quoted text>
What did I say that was so offensive?

Judged:

1

1

1

Marcellus wrote:

<quoted text>
"....the government should help to grow the free market in trying times." This is a perfect example that you just don't get it! That statement is pure ignorance! Unless you are talking about the government buying a lot of products they have no business "helping the free market" in any way, because short of participation in it as a consumer, all they intend to do is place artificial restrictions on it. Thus handicapping it and doing nothing to help it at all. You are still so incorrectly stuck on the fact that "THE GOVERNMENT" is the answer, you need to wake up and realize that the government is the PROBLEM!!!

Judged:

5

5

5

Hampton Handyman wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you are so short sighted that you refuse to admit that we agree on the issues and the wanted out come we just looking at it from two different view points.
What do you have against the government changing laws, lowering taxes, and investing in their work force to attract global business back from the likes of Mexico and Asia?
All you have done is tell me how wrong I am even when I agree with you.

Judged:

7

6

6

Hampton Handyman wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you are so short sighted that you refuse to admit that we agree on the issues and the wanted out come we just looking at it from two different view points.
What do you have against the government changing laws, lowering taxes, and investing in their work force to attract global business back from the likes of Mexico and Asia?
All you have done is tell me how wrong I am even when I agree with you.

Judged:

1

Hampton Handyman wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again you are so short sighted that you refuse to admit that we agree on the issues and the wanted out come we just looking at it from two different view points.
What do you have against the government changing laws, lowering taxes, and investing in their work force to attract global business back from the likes of Mexico and Asia?
All you have done is tell me how wrong I am even when I agree with you.

Judged:

1

1

1

Marcellus wrote:

<quoted text>
Without States taking back rights from the Federal government and shaking down in a major way the power that has been taken from the people by the federal government, NOTHING the federal government does will be in the best interest of the people, but as it has now for some time, will be in the best interest of maintaining power over the people. The federal government isn't going to voluntarily give up power that it worked so hard to steal away, are you that gullible?
Major government reform as I mentioned earlier is the only way to regain control over an out of control government in Washington. I'm sure you remember my "one answer" with 6 parts....

Judged:

4

4

4

Hampton Handyman wrote:

<quoted text>
That is the problem with you libertarians. You are so set on being radically conservitive that when someone agrees with you you tell them they are wrong.
You win I can't continue a discussion with someone who argues against their own view point once it starts to make sense.

Judged:

1

1

1

10th cavalary spectre wrote:

To Everyone here,
I agree very strongly with the libertarian point
of view. The only role of government is to interve
-ne as a judge when things get out of hand. Since,
things have gotten out of hand it's time for the
gov. to come in to ameliorate the problems. Thanks
10th cav. spectre having a hot time in Madtown!!

Judged:

2

2

2

10th cavalary spectre wrote:

Dear Marcellus:
The only "ignorant" one here is you. It's obvious
you know nothing about civic process. The role of
gov. is to protect the liberties of all it's citiz
-ens. To make sure one side doesn't overstep the
boundary of the other. When that occurs then
that's when gov. comes in and corrects the dispute
.
Next, as a side note if you look at our over bloated prison system, the majority of people
incarcerated simply shouldn't be there. But, that
-'s another topic to be discussed another time. In
the future Mr. Marcellus, take an entry level social studies course so you can learn the basics
about our system. Then, you won't sound totally
illiterate. Thanks,
10th cav. spectre from Madtown on Wed. Eve!!

Judged:

1

1

1

10th cavalary spectre wrote:

To Everyone here,
I agree very strongly with the libertarian point
of view. The only role of government is to interve
-ne as a judge when things get out of hand. Since,
things have gotten out of hand it's time for the
gov. to come in to ameliorate the problems. Thanks
10th cav. spectre having a hot time in Madtown!!