Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,798

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148892 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Really dan? Can Sandusky use that defense in court too? Maybe I am born to have several wives? Actually there is no proof besides you saying there is, and that is sad, about as sad as you.
Sandusky can claim whatever he wants dumbfuck. He's in prison for playing patty cake with little boys. See....that's illegal.

You want to claim you were born to have several wives??? Good luck.

One thing's for sure...you weren't born to be intelligent, witty or employed apparently.

LOL!!!!!

No one cares over the fact you may not believe gays were born homosexual DUMBASS. Don't believe in evolution, planets, humpback whales or that plants use photosynthesis to gain energy as far as I care. The fact still remains we shouldn't block American adults from marrying the adult of their choice if we're to lay claim we live in a free country moron.

LOL!!!!

Geeezus you're stupid.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#148893 Jul 6, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you be talking about the freak who molested a child, whilst fighting to keep her from being adopted by two Gay people. That news story? Tell me Lucy have I ever misquoted the Bible? I think not, you bible thumpers just refuse to read your own book. Closing your eyes and mind to the reality of the bible, does not make it less real.
Jack, how's the heat and all the shootings doing in your wonderful area? It's great out west! You should visit a donut shop, they have a lot of old people sitting around talking about stories and what people did. It's a sad world. You have quoted the Bible, but if I take a sentence out of a Jack London book, will that explain anything? Have you ever read a book jack? Now you know why you failed on those book reports, you have to read the whole, not just a word or 2. Good luck jack.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148894 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I'd be glad to explain my financial and work experience to you dan. But I'm sure you don't really want to know, it will do nothing but make you feel lower then you already are. I do have my own business, it includes travel to places you only dream about after a night with your friends at faces talking about if you prefer to give or receive.
Oh, I'm sure.

No doubt you make more money in a month than I'd see in a lifetime, travel to exotic destinations I could only fantasize about, have a plethora of secretaries who came off the Victoria Sectret production line and mix with only to top leaders of the local area as well as abroad.

Please kind sir....don't unleash that tiger on me for it would break my delicate sense of self worth.

BAH HAH HAH!!!!

Self employued. Doing what? Fixing windshield chips from your 1985 mini van?

LOL!!!

Get lost loser.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#148895 Jul 6, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Sandusky can claim whatever he wants dumbfuck.
LOL!!!!!
No one cares over the fact you may not believe gays were born homosexual DUMBASS. Don't believe in evolution, planets, humpback whales or that plants use photosynthesis to gain energy. The fact still remains we shouldn't block American adults from marrying the adult of their choice if we're to lay claim we live in a free country moron.
LOL!!!!
Geeezus you're stupid.
So can anyone. That was my point dan. You seem to care over the fact that there is no proof of being born a certain way. Will it make a difference in your lonely life? Will you win here dan? What will be your reward? Will this set you free, will you come out or is it that you are already out and just hiding behind all your stories?
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148896 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Jack, how's the heat and all the shootings doing in your wonderful area? It's great out west! You should visit a donut shop, they have a lot of old people sitting around talking about stories and what people did. It's a sad world. You have quoted the Bible, but if I take a sentence out of a Jack London book, will that explain anything? Have you ever read a book jack? Now you know why you failed on those book reports, you have to read the whole, not just a word or 2. Good luck jack.
Is it just me or is anyone else reading short dicked and insecure as a 1 week old kitten here?

LOL!!!

Hey Ricky....this is off topic. You know that one.

LOL!!!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148897 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Thank you Lord!
Awwww c'mon now Ricky.

That's just plain underhanded & mean.

LOL!!!
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#148898 Jul 6, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I'm sure.
No doubt you make more money in a month than I'd see in a lifetime, travel to exotic destinations I could only fantasize about, have a plethora of secretaries who came off the Victoria Sectret production line and mix with only to top leaders of the local area as well as abroad.
Please kind sir....don't unleash that tiger on me for it would break my delicate sense of self worth.
BAH HAH HAH!!!!
Self employued. Doing what? Fixing windshield chips from your 1985 mini van?
LOL!!!
Get lost loser.
I knew it would be a waste of time to even give you a clue as to my profession. Thanks for reinforcing that thought.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148899 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe kids you are around are really stupid, but unless they are pre-school, we don't need to tell them there are gays out there. What's positive is to educate children about the dangers of same sex relationships and why there are more people testing the waters today because of influence. More young girls today are testing with other girls.
Prove it.
Winston Smith

United States

#148900 Jul 6, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Pick one Danny boy, and tell me why it not a fact;
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage
If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
What do you have to be afraid of with a direct response???
If you post the same bullshit repeatedly it is still bullshit.
Winston Smith

United States

#148901 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>and your point is?
His post, as well as several others that mention the molestations perpetrated by heterosexuals is in rebuttal to Prof Frivolous' contention that all molesters are gay men that are allowed to adopt. Try reading some of the feces being slung from your side of the fence, then maybe you'll understand what all the "off topic" posts are about.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#148902 Jul 6, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>Awww look what we have here a bona fide redneck. Tell me son just how much impact will Knob Creek and its 31 residents have on the impending election? Why don't ya go hunntin and kill somefen fer supper and leaf the runnin of the contry to them adultes. Iffin ya kno whats I meen.
OK then.... You're trying to call me dumb while you write "go hunntin and kill somefen fer supper and leaf the runnin of the contry to them adultes........
I mean, c'mon, I can understand a typo here & there, but that was just plain re-fucking-tarded.
I'm sorry that mama didn't teach you any better, oh wait you probably had 2 dads...
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148903 Jul 6, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I knew it would be a waste of time to even give you a clue as to my profession. Thanks for reinforcing that thought.
What clue moron.

As far as I know you probably consider Bakersfield an exotic destination.

LOL!!!

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Tucker, GA

#148904 Jul 6, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
If someone is having sex with small children, they aren't gay or straight, they are pedophiles. Attracted to children BEFORE the age of puberty.
Straight adults males having sex with underage girls who are past puberty, and gay men having sex with with underage boys past puberty as just scum, and NO different from each other.
Orientation doesn't enter into it.
Give me a break.

In a dozen states in Mexico the age of consent is 12 years old. Even here in the USA it's 14 in at least two states. Your self-serving attempt to distance Catholic priests from gay males fools no one; moreover, it's not supported by medical science -- nowhere is it said male-to-male sex isn't homosexuality when one of the actors is "below the age of consent."

So stop with the bath house junk science, Okay?

Either provide valid cites or save your opinion for your next post-gay pride parade orgy.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#148905 Jul 6, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Give me a break.
In a dozen states in Mexico the age of consent is 12 years old. Even here in the USA it's 14 in at least two states. Your self-serving attempt to distance Catholic priests from gay males fools no one; moreover, it's not supported by medical science -- nowhere is it said male-to-male sex isn't homosexuality when one of the actors is "below the age of consent."
So stop with the bath house junk science, Okay?
Either provide valid cites or save your opinion for your next post-gay pride parade orgy.
LMFOA! Good point
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148906 Jul 6, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Even here in the USA it's 14 in at least two states. So stop with the bath house junk science, Okay?
Liar.

Why don't you stop with the junk science friend.

http://marriage.about.com/cs/teenmarriage/a/t...
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148907 Jul 6, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFOA! Good point
What point dumbfuck?

He lied about the consent age in the U.S. and lookey here - he lied about Mexico's conent age to marry as well.

"Consent: People under the age of 18 may not get married in Mexico without parental consent. With parental consent, boys have to be at least 16 and girls need to be at least 14 years of age."

http://www.mexicolaw.com/Marriage%20in%20Mexi...

You dumbass lemming...LOL!!

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Tucker, GA

#148908 Jul 6, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear Professor Poofington.
HIV seems to be prevalent in both the heterosexual and homosexual communities. Its a fact that 90% of all reported HIV cases world wide are in the heterosexual community. Its also a fact that the Heterosexual community is the fastest growing portion of the world in the spread of HIV.
Pedophilia is both common in heterosexual and the gay community. Its a fact that 77% of all pedophiles are married, heterosexual men who also happen to attend church.
You condem all homosexuals because of the sick act of one man. Yet you do not follow the same ruels for heterosexuals. Not one time have you spoken of Warren Jeffs and his perversion towards young girls, marring many of them at the same time to add to his harem of sex slaves. Never have you mentioned how the parents of these girls allow, even to say they gave the children to the sick freak willingly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Jeffs
Why is that Poofy, why?
Yes, pedophilia exists in the heterosexuality community which is wwy we avoid putting males in charge of young girls. But you're telling is we need not take the same precautions with gay males because when they do pedophilia it doesn't have a homosexual component. For example, you want us to believe when Catholic priests abuse youth it's just coincidental the youth are boys -- that if they had access to girls, it would be girls.

We also want us to believe gay Scout Masters are no more inclined to sexually abuse boys than hetero Scout Masters.

In other words, you're not dealing with truth, you're dealing with damage-control, misrepresentation, and public relations.

When presented with evidence such as gay males handing out The Little Black Book to runaways as young as 14, you're not seeing that as predation, you call it sex education.

And finally, when presented with the damning case of Larry Brinkin you're not offering up any practicable answer for why it isn't an indictment of homosexuality, you're just saying what you always say, "Pay it no mind because -- straights do it too!"

RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#148910 Jul 6, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
Figure it out dan. What's positive about telling a young kid that it's normal to be gay, and tell them maybe they are gay? I guess you are too stupid to see where that leads, but let me stop, that might be the world you envision.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#148912 Jul 6, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
OK then.... You're trying to call me dumb while you write "go hunntin and kill somefen fer supper and leaf the runnin of the contry to them adultes........
I mean, c'mon, I can understand a typo here & there, but that was just plain re-fucking-tarded.
I'm sorry that mama didn't teach you any better, oh wait you probably had 2 dads...
What's stupid Junior is to lay claim gays pose some form of harm to America but cannot provide specifics or proof to the same.

Kind of like claiming worm eating red robins hunt German Shepherds at night given it's an unjustified and absent fear of something that doesn't exist.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#148913 Jul 6, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
His post, as well as several others that mention the molestations perpetrated by heterosexuals is in rebuttal to Prof Frivolous' contention that all molesters are gay men that are allowed to adopt. Try reading some of the feces being slung from your side of the fence, then maybe you'll understand what all the "off topic" posts are about.
Thanks Winston, I do understand. I try to understand from the top of the fence. I have seen both sides use it to their advantage. I look at it as more of a human problem, a mental illness. For example, Sandusky and brinkin both had to be really messed up as youngsters in my opinion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greenbrae Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ellen: Kids are not in star couple's future, El... Mar 25 Commander Bunny 10
Sen Cruz campaign Promises Deportations 4 Xmas Mar 24 Habanero Rollo To... 1
News My safari from Pelikkkan Bay Mar 21 Guater 2
Golden Gate to be Re Named Chris Christie Bridge Mar 15 Ross Christie Cam... 1
Racism Mar 11 Wondering 3
Gov & Senators Photo Wearing Burkhas to Party Conf Mar 4 Lana 2
News Nicasio man partially acquitted in lip-biting case (Apr '10) Feb '15 Jackson1 30
Greenbrae Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Greenbrae People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]