Man shoots police dog, police kill man in Spokane

too bad he didnt take a couple more pigs out before they got him.

too bad he ddin't take out a couple pigs before they got him

Well thank God we dont have you to thank for your cheeriness of Toyotawheeler. Move out of the city where you dont have issues. I dont think youll find one with idiots like this one in it.

It never is a surprise to see how one sided the Spokeman review seems to be. Always looking for the avenue of fights to save its writers everyday. If they printed only the nice stories they would not have jobs.

So the obvious story here, is to continue hitting on the few rants of unhappy people, the ones probly having issues with the dept anyway.

I dont and havent seen too many write ups for the cop who took the time to find out where a stolen bike was or when a reported car being stolen was found within hours. How about the neigborhood who has a drug raid and finally the families can rest because the meth lab was found. What about all the night time raids and night time abuse victims they have to go and settle. Gees people what kind of vengeance are you looking for anyway. You have decided that you dont like the outcome of one story and you beat it to death.

Shonto had his day in court.

Jay has had his day as well.

Next time before you start in ask a cop if you know one, or if you are truly interested, go for a ride along, you will have a new respect for what the people do. Many of you come in at the last minute with your little rants and all it does is make the public look stupid.

Then talk about throwing gas on the fire, rant on the very people that you will have to wait and see what the verdict is in your case.

You are a bunch of Thankless idiotic robotic people. Quick to speak, slow to listen. Do whats fun in the moment and hope your azz dont get handed to you in the end.

Why should Pete get any money in the end anyway?

Didnt his night of drinking lead him to this predicament he found himself in. Is there no consequences for his actions? Do people get to do what they want and never expect others to defend themselves.

Are you just a city without reguard for the ones who swore an oath to protect it from people who cause trouble? Are you so desperate for blood that you are willing to put aside looking truthfully into every bit of information before lending your opinion.

This forem has been full of responses that you can tell that that person never even took the time to get all the facts before leaving their comment.

This isnt only about Petes, Jays, Ottos case only anymore, its about many before and many to come.

"Why should Pete get any money in the end anyway?Didnt his night of drinking lead him to this predicament he found himself in? Is there no consequences for his actions?" Kate said.

What consequences should Olsen have?$153,510, paid by taxpayers, for shooting an unarmed man in the back of the head? His attorney fees paid out of tax money? What does Olsen have to say for himself? Nothing! Guilty! So what are they saying? It was just a big mistake? Well guess what Kate, in the real world people have to pay for thier mistakes. Olsen made alot of them and it all began when he loaded his weapon and took that first drink.

He wasnt unarmed.He had a knife that would carve meat. So he can carry that into a bar? He also acted as if he had a weapon.

Did he ever show the knife? Any knife can carve meat.

Come on it could carve a cow and then to say "I was holding it for a friend" That is the oldest excuse in the world.

Like I said any knife can carve and it was never out of his pockets according to Olsen the one you believe the most.

Oh wow, this Kate is really obsessed with trying to smear Shonto Pete's name. Well guess what, it won't work because "we the people of this United States of America" can see through your falsehoods. Smearing and slandering Pete's name everytime you comment on a story is not going to make any of the untruths you tell true. Where is your conscience? This comment is supposed to pertain to the dog who got shot by a man who really had a gun and jumped out of a real stolen car, or so we are told. This story about the police dog has nothing to do with Pete. Stay on topic Kate and quit letting this obsession to justify Olsen's attempted murder rule you. Next time there is court and Pete is in a civil trial, the Olsen people will probably have someone like Tucker say they had a dog with them and Pete pointed at it so that's why now Olsen had to shoot him in the head.

Luke warm, great name for being not hot or cold, no real truths, could go either way, never standing for anything, always being on each side depending on his mood, probly a SHonto Pete follower or maybe himself. Pete probly shot the dog too on the rez, that was located at Altons tire looking for the sex in Spokane. Hows that for crossing subjects.LOL

what about the guy that got killed by the cop? what about his family?

so what was the guys name that got killed again?

Kate doesn't need to smear Pete's name, he's doing that job really well all on his own.

Luke Warmwater wrote:

Oh wow, this Kate is really obsessed with trying to smear Shonto Pete's name. Well guess what, it won't work because "we the people of this United States of America" can see through your falsehoods. Smearing and slandering Pete's name everytime you comment on a story is not going to make any of the untruths you tell true...

well isnt it good to know the whole story and who it was? we as a people should have the right to know, not just the cops