Look Who's Busted - resource or wrong?

you very out of touch

out of touch

Wendy wrote:

<quoted text>If you do the crime and your found guilty you do your time in jail...it's not right to plaster their faces all over magazines. Especially the woman who was found NOT GUILTY and yet her face is STILL shown in this magazine. If I were her, I would most definitely sue! It not only slanders her name but it could jeopardize her job and reputation! People will do anything to make a buck these days...and sometimes it's absolutely sick!

1. the faces change biweekly and if they'd stay outa trouble theyd have nothing to worry about!I dont understand what the big deal is. I was in that paper ONCE and i will never be back again. Mabe this will help straighten messed up people out! It did me!

It boils down to town gossip, wouldn't you wan to know if "so and so" was busted for that thing he did.?

Hi: I'm a reporter working on a story for a national magazine about magazines/websites whose business model is publishing the mugshots of arrestees. I'd be most happy to talk with any of you who have been published in one of these magazines or know someone who has--the story is exploring on people's lives of allowing the indiscriminate publication of mug shots. Pls feel free to contact me at steven@stevenyoder.net. Thanks.

Steven Yoder

They should NOT PUBLUSH ARRESTS because they are PRESUMED INNOCENT! Yes it's public information but how bout posting those Found NOT GULTY verdicts with the same fan fair! Sleazy . Lowest form of "freedom of the press" let's can the witch hunt and focus on those actually found guilty only after due process

I'm not sure why everything must be turned into such a debate. You all think your point is valid and everyone else should see your point of view. They're not going to. The fact you idiots continue to sit on here and defend your stand point is pointless and pathetic. At 18 I was arrested. I'm now 21 and for some reason it seems I'm more capable of accepting I did something I knew was wrong, I knew was illegal and I knew there was a possibility of getting caught and facing consequences. And to my bad luck and sheer stupidity I did. For everyone posted on this site and even those who aren't, that bitch and complain about it being at the expense of your own humiliation, degrading and jeopardizing your future and future opportunities, STOP! no one wants to hear it nor will it make a difference. Hey dumbasses there's laws for a reason. They an option and if you choose not to abide by them you gotta live with it. So sorry if a job opportunity is at risk because of it and your employer chooses not to see past that and accept or deny you for the position but yet again, brings me right back to choices. Sorry to bitch slap you all with reality. Get over it or get off it and quit snooping. Now you can all start blowing my statement up with comments disagreeing and bashing my opinion. Sorry that I won't put in any more time or effort to respond to your simple minded, naive and blind remarks.(:

Presumed NOT GUILTY wrote:

They should NOT PUBLUSH ARRESTS because they are PRESUMED INNOCENT! Yes it's public information but how bout posting those Found NOT GULTY verdicts with the same fan fair! Sleazy . Lowest form of "freedom of the press" let's can the witch hunt and focus on those actually found guilty only after due process

They established "innocent until proven guilty" but In the court room there's TWO sides. Protecter and defendant. One is fighting to prove they're guilty while the other is fighting to prove innocence.