Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong. We've had the ability to accurately and affordably test people's $exuality in a lab setting since the 1950s. And in all that time, not one person has ever been able to show that their $exuality changed during the course of their lifetime. Not from gay to straight, not from straight to gay, not even from gay to bi$exual. Not through theraputic means and not through religious means. Also, there have been tons of studies done on homo$exuality - if it was a choice there would be precursors to that choice leading someone to want to be attracted to the same gender or leading them to actually having attraction for the same gender - yet not one study has ever found any precursor or cause.

This is a flat out LIE. Post your proof. There is absolutely NO genetic or biological evidence for homosexuality and I directly challenge you to produce any.

If we accept this homosexual crap, then I fear it won't be long until we'll be "forced" to accept other sexual paraphilia.

Imprtnrd wrote:

<quoted text>your too late. The NAACP says otherwise.

What does the NAACP have to do with it? They do not represent black people or minorities, despite what they appear. This has been true for a very long time now.

Daniel wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think so.
I was a hardened anti-gay stomper not but 4 years ago.
Couldn't stand gays. Thought they had some mysterious lifestyle based on sickening habits and perversions.
Turned out I was the fool. Gays are really no different than "us" heterosexuals given they have jobs, vary in success, work for goals, contribute to this great country and button their shirts the same way.
God damn amazing...isn't it Skippy.
You don't have to like the fact your neighbor 5 houses down married a Chinese wife or that the hot blonde next to you wishes to remain single despite your offer to buy her a 1979 Chevy van with purple velvet diamond tuck trim and flared fenders or even that 6 doors down there's a gay couple living in "sin" because they probably don't dick with your saddened life for the same reason...it creates no harm and therefore ashould be allowed since we live in that land of the brave and free - America.
So please dumbfuck....raise the bar on your own IQ scale and forget about things that are none of your business to begin with.

Pedophiles & serial killers are really no different than "us" heterosexuals given they have jobs, vary in success, work for goals, contribute to this great country and button their shirts the same way.
God damn amazing...isn't it Skippy./sarcasm

_Reality Speaks_ wrote:

<quoted text>
What does the NAACP have to do with it? They do not represent black people or minorities, despite what they appear. This has been true for a very long time now.

think so huh?

_Reality Speaks_ wrote:

This is a flat out LIE. Post your proof. There is absolutely NO genetic or biological evidence for homosexuality and I directly challenge you to produce any.

Post your proof your imagery sky fairy the clouds aka "god" exists.

thisGuy wrote:

If we accept this homosexual crap, then I fear it won't be long until we'll be "forced" to accept other sexual paraphilia.

If we accept retarded idiots like thisGuy, than I fear it won't be long until we'l be forced to accept other retarded Christian fundie bullsh*t

_Reality Speaks_ wrote:

What does the NAACP have to do with it? They do not represent black people or minorities, despite what they appear. This has been true for a very long time now.

What does _Reality Speaks_ have to do with it?_Reality Speaks_ does not represent black people or minorities, despite what _Reality Speaks_ thinks. This has been true for ever.

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
FAIL
left hand dominance = behavior
multiple sclerosis = disease
heterosexuality = behavior
Plus you still haven't proved there's a "gay gene" EPIC FAIL

If heterosexuality and left hand dominance were just behaviors that people choose, they'd both be 50% of the population. Try again, genius.

Is MS a disease that you can catch from others that have MS? Post your source.

People like you are so ignorant. You make this a duck shoot.

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
FAIL
left hand dominance = behavior
multiple sclerosis = disease
heterosexuality = behavior
Plus you still haven't proved there's a "gay gene" EPIC FAIL

wtf?

You MAD bro?

Left hand dominance = genetic trait/ state of being

Researchers who study human hand preference agree that the side of the preferred hand (right versus left) is produced by biological and, most likely, genetic causes.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...

Heterosexuality = state of being/ possible genetic trait

Heterosexualism A state of sexuality–pairing with a partner of the complementary genital morphology–directed to those of the opposite sex.
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.c...

Homosexuality = state of being/ possible genetic trait

Sexology Sexual attraction or erotosexual pairing with a partner of the same genital morphology.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.c...

Multiple Scleroses = possible genetic disorder.

While the cause (etiology) of MS is still not known, scientists believe that a combination of several factors may be involved. Studies are ongoing in the areas of immunology (the science of the body’s immune system), epidemiology (that looks at patterns of disease in the population), and genetics in an effort to answer this important question. Understanding what causes MS will be an important step toward finding more effective ways to treat it and—ultimately—cure it, or even prevent it from occurring in the first place.

You MUST be kidding.

_Reality Speaks_ wrote:

<quoted text>
This is a flat out LIE. Post your proof. There is absolutely NO genetic or biological evidence for homosexuality and I directly challenge you to produce any.

It's not up to me to produce any. You want me to produce proof that people haven't changed when they aren't willing to submit to testing for obvious reasons? That's nuts. They've had the ability to prove that they've changed for decades and yet they haven't. That says it all.

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
I see you can't even make friends in a gay thread.......LOL

Hey shit-for-brains! How many friends do you have on this thread? According to you there are only three (3) people on the whole net who don't like you.

Better learn to count better.

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no such thing as race? What???

NO, there is no such thing as "race". The entire human genome has been mapped at the molecular level, and there is nothing in DNA which corresponds to "race".

Here Is One is a joke wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey shit-for-brains! How many friends do you have on this thread? According to you there are only three (3) people on the whole net who don't like you.
Better learn to count better.

>
>
Here is one is the kind of Idiot who will go to a synagogue and preach Catholicism to the the congregation ...and after he gets nailed to the wall he will claim everyone likes him.....

_Reality Speaks_ wrote:

<quoted text>
FAIL.
You are a walking stereotype for homosexuality. Snippy, superficial and fill of "Oh really?", "Whatever, Dear", and "Says who?" and general "Nya nya".
If you are gay, you are not normal. If you are gay and want to marry another gay, then you are a freakshow.

Your opinion.

_Reality Speaks_ wrote:

<quoted text>
NO, there is no such thing as "race". The entire human genome has been mapped at the molecular level, and there is nothing in DNA which corresponds to "race".

WTF???

LOL!!!

I suppose there are really no marshmallows either.

In your dicked up head there's probably no difference between a Bengal tiger and Fluffers the neighbor's household cat.

I wouldn't be talking about freakshows Chief.

LOL!!!!

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't evaluate interracial marriage with a perversion, gaytard. They are not the same.
In interracial marriages, there is a mother, father, & a child. And they are all usually heterosexual & are capable of procreation. You homos are neither, nor are your kids risen with both mother & father figures. So your interracial argument is a fail.

The two hold many simularities.

A bond between 2 adults, the ability to raise children and the fact at one point or another one of the two in the marriage is going to be in the dog house.

LOL!!!

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love then you should be okay with your
heterosexual marriage being outlawed.

First, I'm mocking the stupid assertion that marriage is required for love to exist in a relationship. So you start by (deliberately and/or ignorantly) convoluting the original message.

Then you make a idiotic assertion that if you believe denying marriage prevents love, then all marriage should be outlawed. Really? This is a intelligent adult response??? It seems more like a teenage girl response to me.

Please detail how you reached that conclusion, I'd really like to hear it.

thisGuy wrote:

<quoted text>
O RLY? Show me there's a "gay gene" & then we'll talk.

Hey....

...weren't yuo the goofed up stupid jackass of a poster that pointed at California's deficit and laughed whilst your fine redneck state is in the red for twice as much????

And weren't you the bonafied MORON who laid claim he didn't like Mexicans and would avoid California like the plague because of it yet your fine abode is in TEXAS??????

LOL!!!

What's next clown? You gonna laugh at someone's wardrobe malfunction only to realize your schlong had been hanging out of your pants for an hour after using the restroom at the MALL???

BAH HAH HAH!!!!

You're an IDIOT!!!

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
First, I'm mocking the stupid assertion that marriage is required for love to exist in a relationship. So you start by (deliberately and/or ignorantly) convoluting the original message.
Then you make a idiotic assertion that if you believe denying marriage prevents love, then all marriage should be outlawed. Really? This is a intelligent adult response??? It seems more like a teenage girl response to me.
Please detail how you reached that conclusion, I'd really like to hear it.

Oh shit...

...it's Letter Boy again.

The ability for 2 adults to marry in this country is a freedom dumbfuck. Because you or the other players in One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest don't agree should hold no bearing on that liberty unless you can find viable harm.