Mason-Dixon appeals gaming decision

LOL...Here we go again. Batter up!!!!!!!!!!

GBM, who's on first?

Is it just me, or does anyone else find it interesting how the Pa. Gaming Board kept delaying the decision to award the lone available gaming license to any of the applicants until after the new Govenor was elected and then all of a sudden the license was issued to the resort in southwestern Pennsylvania which is the area he is from?

This is hilarious. "what" is going to have a flipping cow when she reads this.

It is always politics. I hope this thread does not get out of hand. But that is wishful thinking.
Enjoy your summer everyone

Best location won.

uh-oh, I think that movement has just been detected emanating from the evil "Death Star".

Mr.LeVan must be soooo happy with his little minion's in thier "payback" at Mr.Paddock.Just the controversy he doesn't want when challenging the decision.

Pete wrote:

Mr.LeVan must be soooo happy with his little minion's in thier "payback" at Mr.Paddock.Just the controversy he doesn't want when challenging the decision.

What controversy? Paddocks term was up and he was not voted back in. PERIOD !!!

Junior;Outside of the Pro's little circle,I don't believe it will be viewed that way.You idiot's gave the Paddock's a load of ammunition to use now.Just show's why Mr.LeVan had to work so hard to control you.Left to your own,you do not think.Whether fair or not,people will wonder was Mr.LeVan behind the Paddock "payback"(to use GBM's term)to try to get them out of the way.

The arrogant and prideful can never take no for an answer. This is just a case in point.

I recently had the pleasure of visiting Nemacolin, the best place got the license. Let it go...

ProNoWhatever wrote:

Best location won.

It would appear so. Compared to Nemacolin, the Eisenhower looks like a Motel 6 just outside a trailer park...

Fight till the death for Gettysburg!!!!!!!!!!

Junior --- LeVan or the Casino didn't have nothing to do with Jim Paddock not being voted back in, he was just dead weight.
I and many others feel like the Paddocks Jim and Susan Star should just move to Texas and everyone will be happy.
As far as the investagation into the gameing board it has been long coming, maby this apeal will just do the trick. Go pro Casino.

Pete wrote:

Junior;Outside of the Pro's little circle,I don't believe it will be viewed that way.You idiot's gave the Paddock's a load of ammunition to use now.Just show's why Mr.LeVan had to work so hard to control you.Left to your own,you do not think.Whether fair or not,people will wonder was Mr.LeVan behind the Paddock "payback"(to use GBM's term)to try to get them out of the way.

Why don't you take your opinion and shove it where the sun doesn't shine? Put it next to your brain.

Frank wrote:

Junior --- LeVan or the Casino didn't have nothing to do with Jim Paddock not being voted back in, he was just dead weight.
I and many others feel like the Paddocks Jim and Susan Star should just move to Texas and everyone will be happy.
As far as the investagation into the gameing board it has been long coming, maby this apeal will just do the trick. Go pro Casino.

Hope you're right because this area has seen far too much of the Paddocks and their toadies, bootlickers, lackeys, butt kissers or whatever they call themselves these days.

No means No. (We'll maybe Dave is related to Big Ben.)

And Susan and "what" are the same person. Wait, "what" is Jean or Dan. Oooops.

The only winners here will be the legions of slime, er, lawyers.

I have to much respect for Lee to address the incompetent boob with no life who uses it,by that name.So,dopey,go away.You can whine all you want about it not having anything to do with Mr.LeVan or the casino,but anyone with a modicum of intelligence(something you and the other Pro's severely lack)will view it as "payback" or an attempt to "negate" the opposition.Personally(I may be wrong)I don't think Mr.LeVan would be stupid enough to do this,or to be even stupider to let you people carry it out.But,how will other's(those not in the Pro circle)view it?