Who do you support for Governor in Tennessee in 2010?

COUNCILORRRRRR OH COUNCILORRRRRRRR..REMOVE MY NAME FROM YOUR site

Timbuk2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yer right. Why don't we just do away with the election entirely? And while we're at it, we can throw out that outdated Constitution – no one pays any attention to it anyway.
Bill of Rights? Out with the Constitution. Maybe we can make a new one. We’ll take Ginsburg’s suggestion and use the one from South Africa. They’re much smarter than us anyway.
But why stop there? Maybe I’ll close my business, and go on Welfare & food stamps. They’re gonna take the money anyway, so why work?
As a matter of fact, why get out of bed in the AM?
Yup. You have the right idea. Give up on everything.

Hey man.You really need to try some St.John's wort.I already got mine.I just keep wondering whats next.

Overtaxed wrote:

cont.... Now we have an effort by the Republicans to turn contraception into a campaign issue using the opposition to an ACA provision of providing birth control to employees, by the Catholic Church. The Komen flap and the Planned Parenthood defunding position held by the Republicans.
These positions will have an effect on women voters, who use birth control ALMOST universally.
Who is ULTIMATELY left in the Republican column ? IF they do not change and adapt to a new reality in this country, they will end up a regional party of the Old South, and part of "flyover country" in the center of the nation.
Yes...ole Mitt can win this election on economic issues, and the GOP CAN adapt to new realities....but for now, they seem to be mired in the 1960's and somewhat to the right of Barry Goldwater

If we don't get our $#it together...the Soros prostitutes will steal another election!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/13/re...

They are working very hard right now!
ACORN is down but George Soros is not out (of money).

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/13/re...

WE SUPPORT our gov! Like all politicians, he does goof from time to time!

I can't take this anymore.There is no trust left in me towards this government.
Bigfoot 2012

I would like to make a suggestion , vote for the candidate that after doing your own unbiased research , you find the candidate to be appealing , extraordinary, startling , stupendous , honorable , worthy of trust , loyal , patriotic , pristine , and well spoken. When it comes down to voting at the polls , make sure you are knowledgable and not voting based on opinions of other citizens. Lastly , your vote counts .

Citizen wrote:

I would like to make a suggestion , vote for the candidate that after doing your own unbiased research , you find the candidate to be appealing , extraordinary, startling , stupendous , honorable , worthy of trust , loyal , patriotic , pristine , and well spoken. When it comes down to voting at the polls , make sure you are knowledgable and not voting based on opinions of other citizens. Lastly , your vote counts .

Cut to the chase..

VOTE ABO!

interesting wrote:

<quoted text>
I go to a Baptist Church and our pastor said he's voting for Romney. He thinks Obama is a Muslim and a non-christian. I can't understand why people keep saying this stuff.
I bet if Romney suddenly switched to the Democratic ticket these same individuals would then say Romney had a cult religion and they wouldn't vote for him.

As I shake my head about your pastor,(that is sad) you are 100% correct about what would happen if Willard switched to the Democrat side.

"Monsignors' Mutiny" Revealed By Vatican Leaks."

Click here:
http://news.yahoo.com/monsignors-mutiny-revea...

Dunlapian wrote:

<quoted text>As I shake my head about your pastor,(that is sad) you are 100% correct about what would happen if Willard switched to the Democrat side.

I agree - I am over it with hearing the preachers preaching politics. But remember to not step on their constitutional rights regarding separation of church and state!

Citizen wrote:

I would like to make a suggestion , vote for the candidate that after doing your own unbiased research , you find the candidate to be appealing , extraordinary, startling , stupendous , honorable , worthy of trust , loyal , patriotic , pristine , and well spoken. When it comes down to voting at the polls , make sure you are knowledgable and not voting based on opinions of other citizens. Lastly , your vote counts .

Do I find the candidate
1.appealing-yes very earthly
2.extraordinary-to the limit
3.startling-sure would startle me
4.stupendous-oh..very astonishing
5.honorable-more research
6.worthy of trust-you can trust mother nature
7.loyal-compared to Clinton?
8.patriotic-well..been seen hanging out in Canada
9.pristine-fits well with Websters"characteristic of earliest period"
Would not be voting on others opinions for sure.
Yes I am Convinced.
Bigfoot 2012

Exasperated1 wrote:

<quoted text>
OT, I hadn't see where the pentagon and intelligence community has finally decided Iran "does not have a bomb and has decided not to build a bomb"...Have you seen this 2 or is Buchanan purely speculating?

E1, The pentagon believes that they do not and I have read this on different recent occasions and from both right and left leaning sources.
I have no earthly idea what the intellegence community REALLY thinks...as a lot of what they think is probably classified, and like you I havent read much about THEIR take. I would guess Buchanan has more access to those who would know than you or I.(and I do not know how much faith I would put in their assessment one way or another based on the "intellegence" on Iraq)
Bucanan does have a point though.......or at least I think he does.
OBVIOUSLY, I would prefer that Iran never have a WMD but if Bucanan is right and Israel has 200.....I can't really blame them for wanting one, and I see why they resent us telling them they can't.
The Soviet Union had hundreds of them aimed at US most of my life, and we had hundreds pointed at them. THAT is what prevented anyone from using one. They called it mutually assured destruction.....I suspect Iran would like some of that kind of insurance, or assurance.

Iran is an old country, a couple of centuries old. I do not think even the radical leaders in charge now would be willing to have their country turned into a cinder by launching a unilateral nuclear attack on Israel or anyone else for that matter.

Overtaxed wrote:

<quoted text> E1, The pentagon believes that they do not and I have read this on different recent occasions and from both right and left leaning sources.
I have no earthly idea what the intellegence community REALLY thinks...as a lot of what they think is probably classified, and like you I havent read much about THEIR take. I would guess Buchanan has more access to those who would know than you or I.(and I do not know how much faith I would put in their assessment one way or another based on the "intellegence" on Iraq)
Bucanan does have a point though.......or at least I think he does.
OBVIOUSLY, I would prefer that Iran never have a WMD but if Bucanan is right and Israel has 200.....I can't really blame them for wanting one, and I see why they resent us telling them they can't.
The Soviet Union had hundreds of them aimed at US most of my life, and we had hundreds pointed at them. THAT is what prevented anyone from using one. They called it mutually assured destruction.....I suspect Iran would like some of that kind of insurance, or assurance.
Iran is an old country, a couple of centuries old. I do not think even the radical leaders in charge now would be willing to have their country turned into a cinder by launching a unilateral nuclear attack on Israel or anyone else for that matter.

Buchanan...not Bucanan ooops as Rick said... Chuckles

Oh my ! I found some body that not only agrees with my candidancy pre requisites as well as believes in Big Foot ? Can you say miracles do occur ? No Obama 2012

Hey wrote:

<quoted text>
Do I find the candidate
1.appealing-yes very earthly
2.extraordinary-to the limit
3.startling-sure would startle me
4.stupendous-oh..very astonishing
5.honorable-more research
6.worthy of trust-you can trust mother nature
7.loyal-compared to Clinton?
8.patriotic-well..been seen hanging out in Canada
9.pristine-fits well with Websters"characteristic of earliest period"
Would not be voting on others opinions for sure.
Yes I am Convinced.
Bigfoot 2012

You guys really miss me don't ya?

G Bush wrote:

You guys really miss me don't ya?

Oh God yes. Anything is better than what we have.

Charles Ray Bunch, DOB 12/21/1954
Charles Ray Bunch currently lists his address as
Charles Ray Bunch
40 Deerwood run
Big Sandy Tennessee.
4/25/2002 court docket number 2PC011000157
JUDGMENT GUILTY CONVICTION

Wednesday, September 5, 2001
http://archives.starbulletin.com/2001/09/05/n ...
WAILUKU >> A former Maui liquor control inspector and his wife have pleaded no contest to intimidating a witness and tampering with another witness.

Charles Bunch, 46, and his wife Haeng Yon Bunch, 45, entered the plea yesterday in Maui Circuit Court. The charges stemmed from an alleged prostitution business operated along Lower Main Street in Wailuku.

The Bunches, who each have posted $15,000 bail, are awaiting sentencing in U.S. District Court on Nov. 4 on charges stemming from an alleged prostitution operation. Known pornographer and one time arrest for promotion of prostitution.
Owner of porn shop.
Paradise Spice Adult Emporium
Charles Bunch Owner
1010 Lower Main St # B
Wailuku HI

Is a pornographer and suspected prostitution king pin the person you want as your neighbor? A 1999 conviction for harboring illegal aliens for alleged immoral purposes resulting in conviction in Federal court in Hawaii.
Served one year.

Additional information shows Charles Bunch acknowledged failing to report income tax and employment records for the illegal aliens in his employment at his porn shop in Hawaii. 2002 conviction of Charles Bunch in Hawaii for intimidation of a witness while on bond for promotion of prostitution.
Sentenced to $1000.00 fine and 5 years of state supervised probation.
Charles Bunch pleaded GUILTY. Charles Bunch filed for divorce against his wife, HAENG YON BUNCH, a Resident Alien living in the state of Hawaii in 2006 just prior to moving to Big Sandy Tennessee. Bunch withdrew his divorce complaint in 2007.
HAENG YON BUNCH was the co-defendant in the prostitution case along with husband, Charles R. Bunch. Charles R. Bunch filed the complaint against Maui County in January 1994 alleging that his superior officer was corrupt and selling liquor licenses to convicted felons.,, Charles Bunch resigned from his job with out benefit of pension and entered the world of pornography and alleged prostitution.
The FBI investigated the complaints of Charles Bunch who later sued Maui County and lost. The FBI concluded their investigation and found no basis to the complaints filed by Charles R. Bunch. Charles R. Bunch was written up several times for calling in sick and then spending the day drinking in local bars according to reports on file with Maui County public records.

Yeah, Marie and GB, etc.,
Because you move around out there in Texas and change your name so often, you will necessarily feel lost, lonely, and alienated! There is no help for it, so why don't you all (wink, wink) camp out at the gate to HIS RANCH in Crawford and ask him to sponsor an amendment allowing him back for 3rd term?

elle1 wrote:

Yeah, Marie and GB, etc.,
Because you move around out there in Texas and change your name so often, you will necessarily feel lost, lonely, and alienated! There is no help for it, so why don't you all (wink, wink) camp out at the gate to HIS RANCH in Crawford and ask him to sponsor an amendment allowing him back for 3rd term?

I just agreed with that poster. What's wrong with that gay boy?