UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince will remain No. 1 QB

Judged:

2

2

1

Trojan wrote:

<quoted text>
And you are a Bruin fan...in complete denial of the hundreds of thousands JW spent in order to get those NC's. No worries. It's all good, Mr. Double Standard. LOL!!!

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text>By no means! please post a link of report in which JW or UCLA were found guilty of such accusations...until you do, you're just a troll...

Judged:

2

2

2

Trojan wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll do that when you post a link to something that shows OJ was found guilty of murder. I'll wait right here. LOL!!!

Judged:

2

2

2

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text> A friendly reminder to the young Alzheimer patients like you - UCLA 2011 Pac-12 South Division Champs...AND Sanctions to the pucking cheaters at the Uvinersity Sorrunded by Crips.

Judged:

1

1

1

Chosen Traveler wrote:

<quoted text>BTW, some P.I. is now saying that OJs son was responsible for the murders and The Juice had nothing to do with it...

Bruin Nation wrote:

<quoted text>
Really CPEM USC has the LARGEST southeast asia enrollment in the NATION and your bagging on UCLA for taking more out of state students? at least their US Citizens

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

@Trojan, that is the biggest crock of shyt I've ever heard of...one of the witnesses testified that O.J. Simpson purchased a long knife two days prior to the murder...furthermore why did OJ have laccerations Olin his hands? why did Nicole Simpson have his blood under her finger nails? why did OJ have $50,000 in cash and flight tickets to leave the country? why did OJ run away from police? why did OJ jump over the wall at his house 5 minutes after the murder and according to Kato he was packing a suit case and visibly distraught? with cuts on his hands? what a pucking moron you truly are and any jackasses who thinks OJ is innocent....the younger kids who weren't around to actually see the trial and are too young to remember? I can understand their ignorance, but you? you have ni excuse.

Judged:

1

1

1

CPEM wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes we do, we have the largest enrollment of international students of any university. Having worked in the financial aid office at USC, I think I am more than qualified to also state that each and every one of those students must demonstrate they have the ability to pay the full fare for their education. They receive ZERO financial aid from the university and ZERO financial aid from the US or state government. They pay the full amount.
Meanwhile, at UCLA what I was referring to was that UCLA's admission practices have changed the last few years where more out-of-state students are being admitted. This is being done because out-of-state students pay a tuition rate that is higher than in-state students. Out-of-state students are less subsidized by California residents, but still subsidized. Beyond that, it is really an accounting trick. UCLA, like most ethical/legitimate/not-for-pro fit universities, practices a "need-blind" admissions policy, where you are admitted based on your merits, not your ability to pay. The financial aid office, like USC's, practices a policy of meeting 100% of an eligible student's financial need. Financial need is determined using a simple formula:
COA (Cost of Attendance)
- EFC (Expected Family Contribution)
----------
= Financial Need
The fun part is determining the EFC. But that's another time, another place. Here's where the accounting trick comes in. "John" is a California resident recently admitted to UCLA. "Jerry" comes from New York, also admitted to UCLA. Both students have the same EFC. Here's how the numbers play out:
John
$32,000 COA (I'm guessing)
$16,000 EFC
==========
$16,000 Financial Need
That means he will receive $16,000 in need-based financial aid. This will consist of state and federal aid, as well as federally-subsidized loans. To keep it simple, let's say Cal-Grant (state) covers 10k, Pell Grant (federal) covers 1k, and Stafford Subsidized Loan (federal) covers 1k.(These are all general #s, actual numbers will be different.) That leaves 4k in unmet need. Whatever isn't covered by those sources, the school will provide in the form of a grant. For the most part, merit scholarships will reduce the university grant (counterintuitive, I know, but again, another place, another time).
Jerry
$54,000 COA (out-of-state students pay about 22k more)
$16,000 EFC
==========
$38,000 Financial need
So he will get $38,000 in financial aid. He gets zero in Cal-Grant, the same 1k in Pell Grant, and 3k in Stafford Loan. But in the end, he will have more unmet need (34k) than John, because they are charging him more than John. And guess who steps in to cover it? UCLA with the grant. And where does UCLA get the money to do this? Donations, tuition payments from others, and the state. And where does the state get the money? Our taxes.

Judged:

1

1

1

Trojan wrote:

<quoted text>
As I stated, someone who truly believes in God and the bible, would just accept what the courts did and leave it in God's hands.
You can think whatever you like. Not everyone is a believer...many just go through the motions.
I wish non-believers, such as you, the very best, too.
FIGHT ON!!

Judged:

1

1

1

Trojan wrote:

<quoted text>
Now there you go, making sense. That's never going to work with someone like BFL. LOL!!

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text>What? what does God gotta with this??
And you still haven't told me what you majored in at USC.

Judged:

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text>Do you really think I have patience to read a thread that size?? ahhhh nope! I have no idea what he wrote, nor do I give a rat's arse.

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text>Do you really think I have patience to read a thread that size?? ahhhh nope! I have no idea what he wrote, nor do I give a rat's arse.

Judged:

1

1

1

Trojan wrote:

<quoted text>
As I stated, someone who truly believes in God and the bible, would just accept what the courts did and leave it in God's hands.
You can think whatever you like. Not everyone is a believer...many just go through the motions.
I wish non-believers, such as you, the very best, too.
FIGHT ON!!

Judged:

1

1

1

CPEM wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical...

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text>What a moron!! you and I were both given a mountainb of evidence from the prosecutors that would have brought 99.99999999999999% of the defendants to life in prison, of not for the 12 moron jurors who were brainwashed by Cochran and bought into the Race-card. You know as well as I do that, when the verdict was read, you were in shock! as well as 99.9999999999% of the people who saw the trial from the beginning to the end, I was enraged, and you were glad because the SCumbag was a trOJan. So bring God into this, the judgment I'm passing is completely justified in the eyes of God because ALL evidence was presented for one with even one-half of a brain to judge this OJ low life as a murderer...the fact that 12 star-struck morons gave him the innocent plea, does NOT make him innocent of the crime. If I was to be passing blind judgment, you could bring God and the Bible into this, however, that is NOT the case here, OJ is exempt from anyone crying wolf for one's judgment on that double murderer.

Judged:

1

1

1

Bruin For Life wrote:

<quoted text>besides that you weren't replying to me, but had it been a sbort post, I might have taken the time to read it, as I usually do. Sorry, but I'm sure BN read it though.