|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
Has the author ever worked in the capacity of an Attorney General in any state? Has he ever been employed in Law Enforcement or in a Major Crimes Forensic Unit? Let Mr. Sherman make a donation, 100% of the proceeds he receives from the book sales goes to the community of Franconia to help them heal. Then and maybe then I'll see the book in different light than what it is to me. He's just another author making money from a tragedy and the murder of a police officer and subsequent death of the officers killer.
|
|
KingCast
Boston, MA
|
Hey dumb ass: Casey Sherman has written a book responsible for the exhumation of a body, and basically proving that the Boston Strangler, at least in one instance, was not DiSalvo. He read the same material I presented to you and he pretty much agrees with your assessment in "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder" that I helped you edit, remember I have the emails between us you fool. http://www.scribd.com/doc/2034214/Try-Gregory... And I agree as well. But you no longer agree, that's Your Damage Dude -- it doesn't give you any right to talk down Casey you ignorant pig. -The KingCaster PS: Articulate each and every thing you claim I told you about this case that is materially incorrect in your opinion, so I can post it on my blog and everyone can see how smart you are, LOL. I remember the Floyd entrapment one, that's a Good One, let's see you go from there hahahahaaaaa.... Tool.
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
In regard to Albert DeSalvo (not DiSalvo) he was never charged with any of the Boston Strangler crimes nor did the police consider him the primary suspect. He confessed to the crimes and every fact in the confession he got wrong were IDENTICAL to the wrong facts that had been published in the Boston Globe, the Boston Herald and all the other newspapers that covered the case. The Boston Strangler case is still an open/unsolved case so what great enlightenment did Mr. Sherman shed on the other 10 murders.......... NOTHING. But of course you know more than I do about the case, lets see you were maybe 2 at the time of the serial killings and lived in Ohio....I was 14 and lived in Boston yeah you know more than I do. If I was agreeing with you and stroking your ego you would be bragging and singing your praises for me like you did in the past and you do now with your new found "friends". But alas I don't agree with you...and now I am a fool, a dumbass and any other adolescent terminology you choose to use. If Sherman read the same material you provided me then he only read what you wanted to give him NOT the whole file. You are a LIAR if you state you gave me everything that you had for information.. RIGHTS what do you know about RIGHTS, you trample on peoples rights all the time you violate peoples privacy rights, You will leave nothing for society to even remotely want to remember you for. You have done NOTHING to make the world or this country a better place..
|
|
Snowy
Beverly, MA
|
Bill, quite simply, what goes around will surely come around. we're each on our own journey....let him flail about....it keeps it all intersting. we can be grateful for maturity and some wisdom.
|
|
KingCast
Boston, MA
|
Snowy wrote: Bill, quite simply, what goes around will surely come around. we're each on our own journey....let him flail about....it keeps it all intersting. we can be grateful for maturity and some wisdom. What's going around and coming around is Kelly Ayotte getting her comeuppance for covering up this case, brought on in part through Casey Sherman, the professional writer that you tools couldn't wait to see what he had to say because you didn't trust me :) What's going around and coming around is Casey recognizing my efforts and successes at obtaining and producing relevant documents in this case. What's going around and coming around is Casey not even mentioning you tools once in his book because he saw right through your veil of nonsense, hatred and vitriol. Bill, give me a list of anything and everything I allegedly did not show you that you believe is relevant in this case that would have changed your mind before you wrote most of "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder." Not only did I give you everything I had, and hosted investigative files on line, you are a bright, intelligent, not-suspended attorney who as you point out lived around here for much longer than I have, so you should have not spoken without knowing WTF you were talking about. So break it down for us right here, right now bubba: What information did I allegedly leave out that would have changed your discourse? Best regards My Friend, -The KingCaster
|
|
KingCast
Boston, MA
|
Remember these comments from this thread about the book in the first instance? http://www.topix.com/forum/news/journalism/TV... Wilhelm Canaris Ghost “Eye Smell a Huckster in NH” Wilhelm Canaris Ghost “Eye Smell a Huckster in NH” Joined: May 29, 2008 Comments: 2164 Waltham, MA Reply »|Report Abuse|Judge it!|#93Jun 13, 2008 Judged:111 The real Casey Sherman has written REAL books on REAL topics. I look forward to his accounting of the Kenney/McKay saga. Perhaps it is the real Casey Sherman posting here, but I'm suspicious because of all of the recent "impostoring." As I said earlier, I hope the book has some fictional references to a cop-hating hustler who has latched onto the case in a quest for cash, valuable prizes, and publicity. Joined: May 29, 2008 Comments: 2164 Waltham, MA The real Casey Sherman has written REAL books on REAL topics. I look forward to his accounting of the Kenney/McKay saga. Jun 1, 2008 Lower Slower Delaware wrote: Are you affiliated in any way with Christopher King in this endeavor? Hi there, I have met Chris only once before. It is very important for me to stress that this is an independent project. Jun 1, 2008 Mr. Sherman, Thank you for your candor and honesty. Doing the Right Thing wrote: When was that once? Did it have anything to do with your being at the Alma Jean Boisvert/Floyd trial in April 08? If not, how do you explain your baiting of Mr. Floyd at Mr. Kings' side? I attended the Floyd trial but did not bait the defendant. If you attended the trial, you'll remember that Mr. Floyd immediately began cursing his own attorney after the verdict was read. Greg Floyd needed no baiting. ********** Hey Bill remember this lie you told: Remember I have the emails where we worked on Try Gregory Floyd for Murder you Big Dummy: Jun 5, 2008 "Worked" together ? I've never even met the man, nor did I "work" with him.
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
Bullshit you took the liberty of editting the document I wrote. I neither solicited or asked for your assistance, and I certainly never "worked" with you. Furthermore Mr. Sherman has already admitted he tried to approach Mr. Floyd in a mens room for an "interview" given the circumstances I would consider tha a form of baiting. I have the email (which I forwarded to the NHAG's office, Martha McLeod, and several other officials in NH) you sent out to members of the Franconia Collective telling them to "bring cameras to the Floyd trial, and I'll do the rest to push him over the edge" The only LIAR and a pathological liar at that is YOU, Christopher King suspended attorney.
|
|
Mired in Mizzou
Rindge, NH
|
Bill Christy wrote: I have the email (which I forwarded to the NHAG's office, Martha McLeod, and several other officials in NH) you sent out to members of the Franconia Collective telling them to "bring cameras to the Floyd trial, and I'll do the rest to push him over the edge" My memory fades. Can you show me that email, maybe host as an immage for all to see? You don't seem to have a problem sharing it and expound on it. I've seen similar emails regarding this event, but don't recall the "push him over the edge" content. It would be enlightening for all I'm sure.
|
|
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
Judged:
1
1
nope....it's states evidence, no can do.
|
|
Mired in Mizzou
Rindge, NH
|
Judged:
2
1
Now I'm doubly perplexed. State's evidence? For Greg Floyd? Why was that not introduced in his trial and sentencing for parol violations? Seems to me such evidence would have been important at that point in time? Is the State finally going after King? If so, for what? Is he so stupid as to be unfased or ignorant of this if true? I guess I'm still skeptical of the "push him over the edge" statement, it sound like an embellishment on your part, but if you say so. Thanks for responding.
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
I didn't say it was for Floyd's defense you did. In answer to you question Mr. King thinks he is above the law and above the Lawyers Oath that he took when he first became an attorney because he was suspended (with just cause)by the State of Ohio. Go back and read through Topix he made the same comment after the fact bragging about the fact that Floyd snapped. Just like the recent video King has posted: http://www.youtube.com/watch ... Christopher King clearly states the following: "I'm a local blogger I PRACTICE civil rights law, I used to be an assistant attorney general in Ohio and a reporter"
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
sorry here is the link to the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch...
|
|
Mired in Mizzou
Rindge, NH
|
For Greg Floyd? was a question to you, not a statement of presumed fact on my part. Maybe that wasn't clear, sorry. I've read a lot of bragging by all parties here on Topix. For example, Floyd bragged of 43 kills but that doen't make it true, does it? Why is King's alleged bragging any different? Floyd was caught up in the moment as was King. It's hard to view them differently unless that is how you want to interpret them. As for the youtube vid, thanks for the link. For me its hard to tell whether it was present of past tense, could go either way in my opinion. Pity, but as in football, the ruling on the field stands unless there is irrefutable evidence. I can neither agree nor disagree. Again, I think it depends upon how you feel about the subject and the subject speaking. I see you started another discussion about "Bad Blood". Why does this book cause you so much consternation, given the fact it is one man's interpretation of events, aka fiction? I don't see it changing the game one way or the other. He's just an another author promoting another book. Your apparent fixation on King and hatred toward him seems out of proportion to any harm he may have caused. It's not like he's any big fish in any size pond. Seems odd, but I guess thats none of my business. I'll just keep watching and reading as time permits.
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
Mired in Mizzou wrote: For Greg Floyd? was a question to you, not a statement of presumed fact on my part. Maybe that wasn't clear, sorry. I've read a lot of bragging by all parties here on Topix. For example, Floyd bragged of 43 kills but that doen't make it true, does it? Why is King's alleged bragging any different? Floyd was caught up in the moment as was King. It's hard to view them differently unless that is how you want to interpret them. As for the youtube vid, thanks for the link. For me its hard to tell whether it was present of past tense, could go either way in my opinion. Pity, but as in football, the ruling on the field stands unless there is irrefutable evidence. I can neither agree nor disagree. Again, I think it depends upon how you feel about the subject and the subject speaking. I see you started another discussion about "Bad Blood". Why does this book cause you so much consternation, given the fact it is one man's interpretation of events, aka fiction? I don't see it changing the game one way or the other. He's just an another author promoting another book. Your apparent fixation on King and hatred toward him seems out of proportion to any harm he may have caused. It's not like he's any big fish in any size pond. Seems odd, but I guess thats none of my business. I'll just keep watching and reading as time permits. Gregory Floyd has never posted anything on Topix boards nor has any member of his family. On the other hand King has stalked Floyd's wife and son obsessively, to the point that they were given a police escort from the courtroom at one hearing. King has obsessively stalked and harassed former NHAG Kelly Ayotte, and Rep Martha McLeod, and lied about both of them. That's why the blog he started about the NHAG was removed because it wasn't factual it was filled with innuendos and in many instances outright lies. It's very obvious to me, he used present tense about practicing law (he backed it up in his blog stating that he indeed does practice civil rights law) which he perceives as his god given right under the first amendment. He used the past tense immediately after saying I'm a blogger and I practice civil rights law about being an assistant attorney general and reporter in Ohio. The Massachussetts AG's office can determine whether he said "practice" or "practiced" they have been apprised of the video, as has the NHAG's office.. I have no hatred for King, or anyone else for that matter. The fact remains he betrayed my confidence about my family and outright lied about me accusing me of illegal drug use in his blog. He has stolen copyrighted pictures from my website and used them in his blog as well without express written permission from me. Only when I threatened him with legal action after contacting the authorities in my state did he retract his comments. He has posted similar accusations about several other former members of the collective as well. I have every right to be outspoken about Mr. King's actions in regard to that and the other issues I mentioned, I personally find his behavior reprehensible. Bottom line as a suspended attorney he is still bound by the Lawyers Oath which he took when he became a member of the Ohio Bar Association. Maybe you take such oaths lightly, I don't. As far as Casey Sherman just being another author, no he is just an author making money off a tragedy in this case 2 dead men, one a police officer and the other a cop killer.
|
|
Snowy
Beverly, MA
|
Bill Christy wrote: <quoted text>Gregory Floyd has never posted anything on Topix boards nor has any member of his family. On the other hand King has stalked Floyd's wife and son obsessively, to the point that they were given a police escort from the courtroom at one hearing. King has obsessively stalked and harassed former NHAG Kelly Ayotte, and Rep Martha McLeod, and lied about both of them. That's why the blog he started about the NHAG was removed because it wasn't factual it was filled with innuendos and in many instances outright lies. It's very obvious to me, he used present tense about practicing law (he backed it up in his blog stating that he indeed does practice civil rights law) which he perceives as his god given right under the first amendment. He used the past tense immediately after saying I'm a blogger and I practice civil rights law about being an assistant attorney general and reporter in Ohio. The Massachussetts AG's office can determine whether he said "practice" or "practiced" they have been apprised of the video, as has the NHAG's office.. I have no hatred for King, or anyone else for that matter. The fact remains he betrayed my confidence about my family and outright lied about me accusing me of illegal drug use in his blog. He has stolen copyrighted pictures from my website and used them in his blog as well without express written permission from me. Only when I threatened him with legal action after contacting the authorities in my state did he retract his comments. He has posted similar accusations about several other former members of the collective as well. I have every right to be outspoken about Mr. King's actions in regard to that and the other issues I mentioned, I personally find his behavior reprehensible. Bottom line as a suspended attorney he is still bound by the Lawyers Oath which he took when he became a member of the Ohio Bar Association. Maybe you take such oaths lightly, I don't. As far as Casey Sherman just being another author, no he is just an author making money off a tragedy in this case 2 dead men, one a police officer and the other a cop killer. very well stated. Mr. King has zero integrity, and is, therefore, an unreliable source of factual information.
|
|
Mired in Mizzou
Rindge, NH
|
By my reading you (and others) do spend an inordinate amount of time on your subject, so much so that to the casual reader you appear to have a vendetta. You have just started a post that could be call "Sherman Bash Here" and you've tryed to discredit (see openness, lack of) and ridicule (see youtube, charmin ad) Mr Whipple, who appears to be a reasonable person based on what little I know. Is this because they have some common ground with King? Again, seems obsessive IMO. By the way, what's up with googling these people and then posting links, tacky, almost King-like. Ayotte and Rep McLeod should be able to take King to task themselves if they really feel threatened, I'm not sure why their perceived maligning has anything to do with you. Are you working for them? I think Casey Sherman spoke with people in all families involved. They must have known what he was doing the interviews for. If they had no such issues, what's the harm, even if you don't like it? Many claim Jon and Kate exploit "Plus 8", so what. If the families involved feel the book is harmful, they need to take him to court.
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
Mired in Mizzou wrote: By my reading you (and others) do spend an inordinate amount of time on your subject, so much so that to the casual reader you appear to have a vendetta. You have just started a post that could be call "Sherman Bash Here" and you've tryed to discredit (see openness, lack of) and ridicule (see youtube, charmin ad) Mr Whipple, who appears to be a reasonable person based on what little I know. Is this because they have some common ground with King? Again, seems obsessive IMO. By the way, what's up with googling these people and then posting links, tacky, almost King-like. Ayotte and Rep McLeod should be able to take King to task themselves if they really feel threatened, I'm not sure why their perceived maligning has anything to do with you. Are you working for them? I think Casey Sherman spoke with people in all families involved. They must have known what he was doing the interviews for. If they had no such issues, what's the harm, even if you don't like it? Many claim Jon and Kate exploit "Plus 8", so what. If the families involved feel the book is harmful, they need to take him to court. It's called transparency just playing the game by King's rules. Mr. Whipple makes assertions about a deceased police officer who can't defend himself while he himself is still a public servant and refuses to disclose any of his positions about matters that concern his constituents, that seems a bit hypocritical to me. To publicly state that a person stopped by a police officer has a right to argue with and or insinuate fleeing a police officer puts every officer inn Sugar Hill Franconia and NH in harms way, that is irresponsible. No I do not work for "them." Who do you work for Christopher King? My understanding is Mr. Sherman did NOT speak to the Floyd family and since he was the only survivor besides Caleb MCCauley (who offered little as well) not everyone involved was interviewed. Mr. Sherman and I have communicated in private, I am not trying to discredit him, I am only questioning how truly unbiased the book is in my opinion. By the way the last I knew expressing my opinion is covered by my 1st Amendment rights. Want to see a vendetta go read all of Chris King's 1st amendment page complete with his claiming I was a drug addict. While you are entitled to your opinion try to base it on a complete picture not just a few posts you happen upon, you clearly do not know the history.
|
|
Mired in Mizzou
Rindge, NH
|
I believe Mr Whipple is a retired police officer and selectman, the page you reference indicates this: Previously Candidate for Grafton County District 3 New Hampshire Based on that he currently has no constituents as he apparently lost the election in 2004. He has not since run if the web site is up to date. I believe he is free to state what he feels just as you are. Except he lives and worked in the area and if he's to be believed warned the town on at least one occasion about Officer McKay's unsuitability as an officer of the law. Since he retired from positions of authority perhaps he does no a bit about the people and how to effectively police them? That carries some weight in my opinion. He's not accusing a dead officer of anything he didn't accuse him of in life. I think he's saying "I told you so". I think your attacking him is founded in your obsession with King.
|
|
Bill Christy
Philadelphia, PA
|
spend a bit more time checking instead of posting about me because I caught King lying again this time on a video. 2008 democratic primary party winners: http://www.sos.nh.gov/demwin.html State Representative Grafton 3 Bradford H. Whipple Sugar Hill 739 Route 117 Sugar Hill, NH 03586 He received NO votes in 2008, I guess he's held in high regard in his community. The fact remains while he demands transparency he refused to take a stand on any issues, or discuss his views. I too lived in that area as did my family until last year when my last relative passed away. As a former NH Fish and Game Safety Instructor for snowmobiles and atv's I spent a number of years up in the area. Mr. Whipple was not employed by the any organization by the State of New Hampshire that oversaw police officers, he was a police officer in another community, nothing more, nothing less. I don't know what police you hang around with but officers don't publicly trash talk about one another ever. You can assume whatever you want I could care less, I have issues with Christopher King and I have issues with Mr. Whipple they are seperate from one another and have no relation to one another. What I heard Mr. Whipple state in the video about questioning a police officer when stopped, puts every officer in harms way in NH and every other state. I have a problem with that, I have many friends in NH, MA, and DE that are LEO.
|
|
Snowy
Gloucester, MA
|
Bill Christy wrote: <quoted text> The dashcam video shows the events of that day without bias. NHRSA clearly states if you murder a police officer it's the death penalty. repeat: "The dashcam video shows the events of that day without bias." King's immensely biased position inevitably strays from indisputable facts. his joining hands with a writer/author merely documents but does not legitimize that biased view in yet another published format. the extent to which Sherman researched before writing will reflect the accuracy of his statements. if inaccurate, they will be subject to the scrutiny of bloggers with knowledge and insight. so far, there has been NEW information revealed to influence or alter the conclusions drawn by law enforcement at the close of their investigation.
|
|
|