Local News: Franklin, TX 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Nov 16, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger

Star Parker Abortion, health care, and socialism

Full story: 590ktie.com

Science and religion are the best of friends. And like good friends, they complement each other and produce beautiful music together.

Read All 10 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 10 of10
Lux et Veritad

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Nov 16, 2009
 
To the great consternation of the pro-aborts are these manifest truths that can no longer be supressed:

"...The discoveries and technologies that we gain from science make us more aware, confirm and help us understand even more clearly the truths that our religion and faith teach us. As result, like Abby Johnson, we become more responsible.

According to Johnson, "....Planned Parenthood really tries to instill in their employees and the women coming in for abortions that this is not a baby, that this is just a mass of cells. You know, don't say "baby" in the clinic. Don't say "baby" to the women coming in for an abortion. And so you begin to believe that. You begin to believe that it's not a life."

A recent headline in the Los Angeles Times read, "Babies are found to cry in their mother tongue."

The article reported on just published research by French and German scientists showing that the cries of French babies start out low and increase to a high pitch and for German babies it's the opposite -- starting out high and falling. According to the scientists, these "patterns matched the intonation patterns of spoken French...and German."

The French and German research teams say the unborn babies start hearing and picking up their mother's language during their third trimester, a stage when, in our country, they can still be aborted. As science documents the magic of the life of the developing infant, public awareness grows and the willingness to tolerate abortion atrocities diminishes. When we understand that our unborn children are human we become more human ourselves."
Lux et Veritas

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Nov 16, 2009
 
To the great consternation of the pro-aborts are these manifest truths that can no longer be supressed:

"...The discoveries and technologies that we gain from science make us more aware, confirm and help us understand even more clearly the truths that our religion and faith teach us. As result, like Abby Johnson, we become more responsible.

According to Johnson, "....Planned Parenthood really tries to instill in their employees and the women coming in for abortions that this is not a baby, that this is just a mass of cells. You know, don't say "baby" in the clinic. Don't say "baby" to the women coming in for an abortion. And so you begin to believe that. You begin to believe that it's not a life."

A recent headline in the Los Angeles Times read, "Babies are found to cry in their mother tongue."

The article reported on just published research by French and German scientists showing that the cries of French babies start out low and increase to a high pitch and for German babies it's the opposite -- starting out high and falling. According to the scientists, these "patterns matched the intonation patterns of spoken French...and German."

The French and German research teams say the unborn babies start hearing and picking up their mother's language during their third trimester, a stage when, in our country, they can still be aborted. As science documents the magic of the life of the developing infant, public awareness grows and the willingness to tolerate abortion atrocities diminishes. When we understand that our unborn children are human we become more human ourselves."

“Marketing to left handed nuns”

Since: Jul 09

one right next to you

ISP: Bangor, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Nov 17, 2009
 
One long and meaningless rant of stupidity.. Filled with the usual inflammatory rhetoric that does nothing to inform any one of anything.

But it sure does make you control freaks and religious zealots feel good..

And 63% do not want Roe v wade to be over turned at the same time.. What does that do for your 51 percent?

http://mediamatters.org/research/200507220007

"For instance, a Pew Research poll conducted June 8-12 asked: "In 1973 the Roe versus Wade decision established a woman's constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not?" Sixty-three percent responded "No"; 30 percent responded "Yes.""
Lux et Veritas

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Nov 17, 2009
 
Red herring. A majority of people want to see abortion allowed under greatly restricted circumstances: rape, incest, imperiled life of the mother.

And those pro-life sentiments aren't new.

A mid-1998 poll by the ardently pro-choice Center for Gender Equality found that 53% of *WOMEN*(only women were polled) said abortion should be illegal except for rape, incest, and saving a woman's life, or else forbidden in all cases. That percentage represented an 8 percent shift away from a pro-abortion position in a poll taken two years earlier. The poll sampled 1,000 women 18 years and older. The title of the report was "The Impact of Religious Organizations on Gender Equality."

To quote the core conclusions: "Only 28% of women today believe abortion should be generally available to those who want it. Altogether, 70% favor more restrictions on abortion, including 17% who say there should be stricter limits than there currently are, 40% who think abortion should only be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or to save the woman's life, and 13% who think abortion should not be permitted under any circumstances."

No less a pro-choice icon than Faye Wattleton, president of the Center for Gender Equality and former president of Planned Parenthood, said of her organization's poll, "We find some of the findings very disturbing." Small wonder. Abortion just doesn't have the saleability it used to.


In a February 2002 poll conducted for Minnesota Public Radio (more liberal than which it's almost impossible to be) by Mason-Dixon Polling and Research of Washington, DC, Minnesotans were asked when abortion should be legal. Fifty-two percent responded either "never" or "only in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother." A minute 6 percent said, "Abortion should be legal, with no restrictions during the first six months of a pregnancy." A tinier minority, only 5 percent of Minnesotans, checked this poll response: "Abortion should be legal, with no restrictions during the full nine months of a pregnancy."

“Marketing to left handed nuns”

Since: Jul 09

one right next to you

ISP: Bangor, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Nov 17, 2009
 
Link please....
Lux et Veritas

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Nov 17, 2009
 
http://www.hi-ho.ne.jp/taku77/refer/gender.tx...

"The survey of 1,000 women was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates on behalf of the Center for Gender Equality, a research, education and advocacy organization dedicated to promoting women' equality....

"Seventy percent of women now favor more restrictions on abortion, including 40% who think it should only be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or to save the woman's life, and 13% who would not permit it under any circumstances. Two years ago 45% of women held these restrictive views on abortion, compared with 53% today."

http://www.mason-dixon.com/public/index.cfm...

“Marketing to left handed nuns”

Since: Jul 09

one right next to you

ISP: Allentown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Nov 17, 2009
 
http://www.hi-ho.ne.jp/taku77/refer/gender.tx...
"The survey was sponsored by the Center for Gender Equality and conducted by Princeton Survey Research
Associates. The survey sample is a representative
national sample of 1,000 women age 18 and older.

Interviews were conducted by telephone during the
period June 30 through July 22, 1998."

two things siting a 1998 survey proves nothing.. and what has this to do with Roe v Wade.. Or even about the tiopic? As far as I can see that in 1998 there were a lot more women that were indictaing that their religion and politics were merging..

However that was 11 years ago.. What about today?

President Obama was elected and Not Sen McCain wirth his running mat Formwer Gov. of Alaska Mrs. Palin. Who is strongly identified with the religious right.

If that study had any relavence. It lost all creditbility after this past election.
Lux et Veritas

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Nov 17, 2009
 
The picture's the same, whether 1998 or 2009: a majority of Americans still believe that abortion should be legal only in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. In ONLY those narrow instances do they "approve" of Roe v Wade.

Polling Company -- 800 adults from May 17-18, 2009 [in the year of The Anointed One]:

A first question asked respondents to identify themselves as either pro-life or "pro-choice" on abortion.

The poll found a plurality, 47 percent, took a pro-life position while 45 percent said they were "pro-choice" when it comes to abortion.

However, a second question, asking respondents to delineate their specific position on when abortion should be legal, found a 14 percent pro-life majority.

The poll found 55 percent take one of three pro-life positions saying that all abortions should be prohibited (10%), abortion should be legal only in cases to save the life of the mother (16%), or abortions should only be legal in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother (29%).

Just 41 percent took one of three pro-abortion positions, with 26 percent saying abortion should be legal for any reason within the first three months of pregnancy, 8 percent saying abortions should be legal within the first six months of pregnancy for any reason, and just 7 percent agreeing with President Obama that abortions should be legal for any reason throughout pregnancy.

“Marketing to left handed nuns”

Since: Jul 09

one right next to you

ISP: Bangor, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Nov 17, 2009
 
Again a link to this new study.. Other wise you are just blowing a lot of smoke.. What I see is that after Former President Bush was done showing every one what compassionate conservatism looked like no one in their right mind wants anything to do with a bunch of hypocrites that say one thing and turn around and does the opposite...

The reality is that no matter how you twist it.. A majority of American do not want Roe V Wade over turned..

"MOST AMERICANS SAY THAT ROE V. WADE SHOULD NOT BE OVERTURNED, BUT THEY ARE DIVIDED OVER WHETHER THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S DECISION WENT TOO FAR IN MAKING ABORTION LEGAL"

http://www.publicagenda.org/charts/most-ameri...

“Freedom means choice”

Since: Jun 07

Roe v Wade is here to stay

ISP: Calabash, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Nov 18, 2009
 
Lux et Veritas wrote:
The picture's the same, whether 1998 or 2009: a majority of Americans still believe that abortion should be legal only in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. In ONLY those narrow instances do they "approve" of Roe v Wade.
Polling Company -- 800 adults from May 17-18, 2009 [in the year of The Anointed One]:
A first question asked respondents to identify themselves as either pro-life or "pro-choice" on abortion.
The poll found a plurality, 47 percent, took a pro-life position while 45 percent said they were "pro-choice" when it comes to abortion.
However, a second question, asking respondents to delineate their specific position on when abortion should be legal, found a 14 percent pro-life majority.
The poll found 55 percent take one of three pro-life positions saying that all abortions should be prohibited (10%), abortion should be legal only in cases to save the life of the mother (16%), or abortions should only be legal in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother (29%).
Just 41 percent took one of three pro-abortion positions, with 26 percent saying abortion should be legal for any reason within the first three months of pregnancy, 8 percent saying abortions should be legal within the first six months of pregnancy for any reason, and just 7 percent agreeing with President Obama that abortions should be legal for any reason throughout pregnancy.
Post a link, or we'll have to assume you are making this up yourself.
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 10 of10
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Franklin Discussions

Search the Franklin Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Police Chief Wed Wondering 1
Eliot Shapleigh and Marisa Marquez: Ethics Comm... Dec 27 Richard 11
Robertson County D.A. Is Asked To Recuse Himself Dec 25 A Mother 9
Abortion always at odds with health-care system... Dec 22 D to R whate... 67
Robertson County DA Dec 8 Yeah man 2
Quanell X To Host Rally In Hearne Dec 7 Tomballpi 2
Nuevo Progreso begs tourists to return (Mar '08) Dec 6 PInkyandNoBrain 75

Install the Topix Community Toolbar

Never miss another reply to your comments, no matter where you are on the web.

Powered by Krillion

Franklin Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
Franklin Dating

more search filters

less search filters

Franklin People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Franklin News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Franklin

Daily Horoscope for January 1

Cancer

Happy New Year, Cancer! Are you ready to put those resolutions into place? Not quite?! Crustaceans are never quite sure just how much they can get away with and where to draw the line. You have a flair for the dramatic and when you're the narrator, your exploits become deeds that would make a knight proud. Your fans know you're a hero, whatever history might prove. Audacity impresses most people but if you go to far you could cause offence.

Get your Horoscope »