Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

No matter what, Mom and dad rest in peace...

Thinking deeply of you...

Your loving son,

Joel.

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

MARRIAGE OR CONTRACT IN PROSTITUTION?
What good is a hypogamous, incestuous or inbreed marriage?
Can such an alliance be called a "marriage"? No.
Such an abnormal union is better termed as a contract in prostitution.
Most "marriages" in the world are of the abnormal types and are as a result no better than illicit sexual contracts or contracts in prostitution.

We allready know for 60,000 posts that you are the product of exactly that kind of union.
Iteration: GET OVER IT.
You are HYPO...EMBRACE IT
It's all you got!

It's so easy to provoke the She-Loon.

(smiles)

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

<quoted text>
The disembodied psychics (souls) of my late parents are in hell suffering for all their misdeeds - dad has become a ghost or a hostile vital being who at times forays into the physical force fields to prey on people especially on family members so as to torment them since his disembodied psychic is neither at peace nor in equilibrium.
I have sighted them on several occasions....
May their souls rest in peace especially my mom's soul since she never tasted peace, love and caring in marital life on account of the regular humiliation, physical abuse and torture she faced at the cruel hands of my dad....
A moment's silence for them...

*We do not mind that your mother was a prostitute.
Such is life.
* Pardon, maybe some people do mind.
By all means speak out so yogi Eugenics can have the opportunity to defend her.

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

It's so easy to provoke the She-Loon.
(smiles)

Being scrolled over for days and pages by everybody...lol

Nah, just like everyone else, bored with silly projections of the stupid troll segment of this forum, so today i answer them all, whatever the assertions, till i get bored with that again.
Sofar had an amusing morning.
You're the last one, as would be fitting.

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

MARRIAGE OR CONTRACT IN PROSTITUTION?
.
Most "marriages" in the world are of the abnormal types and are as a result no better than illicit sexual contracts or contracts in prostitution.

How can something be quantified as "most" as still be considered within the distribution as "abnormal"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CumulativeS...

MAAT wrote:

<quoted text>

We do not mind that your mother was a prostitute.

Yes.

Fact is fact.

I don't shy away from bitter facts and I have admitted to it since I believe in fairness.

Though I am not of hypogamous, incestuous or inbred birth given my instincts, temperament, verve, aspirations and yogic achievements, it is true that my mom was what you said - a prostitute.

So, did she sell her body for money?

Far from it since money is no problem for us.

But, her immoral behavior, after she found out by late dad's womanizing ways and the way he would abuse and hit her black and blue during regular quarrels, can not be swept under the carpet and is inexcusable.

She took to drinking and was a heavy smoker like most upper class women in the elite areas of South Mumbai.

In desperation and in order to find a shoulder to cry on, she found herself an extremely wealthy and rather good-looking, middle aged businessman - a divorcee - who really loved her or so I believe and they brazenly carried on (for which my dad would harass her even more) and on couple of occasions after my dad's death they flew abroad on holidays.

So, my late mom's behavior was inexcusable and resembled that of a slut.

Now, are you satisfied to know that my late mom's behavior was as you said it - that of a prostitute?

Enough !!!!!

Okkkk!!!!!

Good night. Later.

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey dorkhead
Rabbis marry and have children -
You should of attended that bar mitzvah after all

I was speaking about Yogis and not Rabbis.... Are rabbis also Yogis?

I did not know.

Why are you always in so much hurry to reply?

And what is Bar Mitzvah? You did not answer it? Why are you you evasive?

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_you_know_wher...
Do you know where your children are? is a popular question used as a public service announcement for parents on American television, launched in 1971. The question is usually asked around 10:00PM or 11:00PM, depending on the market and/or the time of the local youth curfew. The phrase originated from Buffalo, New York's long time ABC affiliate WKBW, and was possibly inspired by the Scottish bedtime story, Wee Willie Winkie.
----------
Didnt expect you or Joel to get this one - its particular to American culture

Why you confuse people by asking them "slang questions"?

The fault is yours and not of our false yogi. He had to waste so much of his precious yogic time to comment on his parents and the general institution of marriage.

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
We all learned something with this exercise. I always had assumed that the term was necessarily priapic.

Close. Balls - no?

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

<quoted text>
So, you're a yes man?
(smiles0

Yes, I'm a cheap date.

HughBe wrote:

just a quickie. I'm going to the movies.

What movie did you see?

Did you enjoy it?

We just saw the DVD Girl witht the Dragon Tatoo. Not bad.

MUQ wrote:

<quoted text>
I was speaking about Yogis and not Rabbis.... Are rabbis also Yogis?

Post 35471

"The same goes for all priests and rabbis and every one who take the vows of celebicy. This vow is only from outside."

former res wrote:

<quoted text>

Yes, I'm a cheap date.

It's obvious.

(smiles)

MAAT wrote:

<quoted text>
And the significant damage to a loadbearing corner of the building.
And the extreme damage of loadbearing structures underground.
Normally you would destroy those first, well that was done for them, and the structural damage on top could have been the last straw plus ongoing fires all day weakening metal.
So i see a combination of factors.
If any explosives, it wouldn't have needed much.
Insignificant might be used in the sence of not really having any baring on the invetigation itselve.
Thus also not if explosives where used later.

rabbee: well i still have this problem, of any one going on any suicide run into a burning building with explosives. and you would need, enough suicide bomber, to take all all the proper support pilars. kind of like killing a dead horse, by killing yourselves to make sure the dead horse is dead. and the toxic fumes, in a burning high rise don't like people doing that either.

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
A LOT = 1 or more
Hughbe's crush doesnt count - though I am flattered, of course.

Frijoles--- I dont have A LOT of gay men knocking on my door. So the economic model does not hold.

HughBe--- I note your "A LOT of gay men" and by extension you have some. The thing is your taste needs to be improved you cannot just give away your ASSet for pennies. Avail yourself of those with money. The key is not in the number of men but in their economic power.
Run with it.

Frijoles---A LOT = 1 or more

Hughbe---- Accepted and known and that is why I spoke of SOME. Now how many are there? Is it 12 or 24 tell me the exact number of fellows.

Frijoles---Hughbe's crush doesnt count - though I am flattered, of course.

HughBe--- Naturally you would be flattered. However, although I like you that does NOT translate into a CRUSH. Liking you does not mean that you are not FULL of it, ok. I simply stop my breath and look at the minuscule of goodness in you.

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

<quoted text>
Take your time.

Your thoughtfulness is noted.

Thor wrote:

Who here will agree that Israel is a great threat to middle eastern peace prospects in particular, and world peace prospects in general??
No more sitting the fence boys...

rabbee: do you really believe, they could do this. without an alwful lot of help, from the muslems? or that the muslem conspiracy against the yehoodeem, are as innocent as you arn't either.

after all we were guilty, of resisting japan's claim on pearl harbor.

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not competing with you.
Just stating a fact about my looks and the typical reaction of a male like you who likes good looking guys.
Take care.

Joel---I am not competing with you.

HughBe--- That is clear to me given that I have an understanding of what COMPETING means.

Joel---Just stating a fact about my looks and the typical reaction of a male like you who likes good looking guys.

Hugh--- Just a slight correction "Just stating a fact about my looks and the typical reaction of a male like you who likes good looking guys MEANING guys with INNER beauty". Note, the like is NOT physical although I am not averse to saying that someone looks good if such is the case but there is no physical attraction.