GBI files complaint over judge's conduct

The story we hear is one of the GBI agents was involved with a Mrs.Watson who hates judges( one took her child away as an incompetent mother) and the Cooks in particular. He and his partner were on their own initiative, pushing drug suspects to implicate the Judge offering plea deals or threats, when that didn't work. As the GBI has said repeatedly, there was no official investigation. One of the police heard about this and told the judge. That is the reason for the anger heard.

Really???? And you know this, how?

Dear 'Real'
Why would 'Mrs. Watson' hate judges? Maybe the corrupt and bribe-taking ones, but everybody should despise them. Incompetent mother?'Real' should go and read Watson's life story again, to get a few things straight. What is this about a GBI agent 'involved' with Watson? When? Where? Perhaps not? Can a lady not meet people in the course of her work, without being accused of 'being involved'? If you think it is OK for men to have meet people to talk business, but not for a woman, then you are a sexist idiot. Perhaps you would like to turn the USA into one of those countries where women have to wear veils, stay at home most of the time, and are not allowed to talk to men. Good luck!

Redirect somebody's mind by saying
anything. Its one of their tools
of their trade.

It would appear that Real is dead on as to what is going on in this abusive and illegal adventure by what is clearly a rogue and runaway "law enforcement" agency.

Enough has already been published by the various media outlets for anyone to know that there is total truth to what Real has said.

The carping whining lynch mob members are inflicted not only with vapid stupidity but with a total disdain for truth and justice.

There is evil here, for sure. And it is concentrated in the GBI.

Verity posted: "The carping whining lynch mob members are inflicted not only with vapid stupidity but with a total disdain for truth and justice."

Verity:

I haven't posted here for quite a few days now, but HAVE been reading the blog. The arrogance in your postings and the way you freely toss around your childish insults is rapidly becoming obnoxious. The obvious thing that stands out above all is that anyone with an opinion different from yours is either a member of a "lynch mob" you have derived from an imagination in hyper-drive or "stupid". That is the beauty of a thread such as this to someone like you, is it not? You can call someone else anything you like without fear of retaliation. I shall not stoop to name-calling as you seem intent on doing to get a rise out of others. I WILL however make a simple request, one that even you can probably understand. Please, grow up. Your problems with the GBI should probably remain just that. YOUR problems. Possibly you were frightened by an agent at an early age and have never fully recovered from it, I don't know, and truthfully, I don't care. That remains YOUR problem. To continue issuing insults to posters as you are doing is ludicrous. Grow up and realize that the world is full of opinions and not everyone is going to agree with you. That's the nature of the beast. Get over it.

VWN

Well, vocalwhenaccessory, I guess I should have expected you. Anytime I post observations about the deficiencies of the lynch mobbers, there is suddenly an uproar in the scrub brush and reeds, and YOU come charging forth like some squealing swamp sow defending its territory.

I won’t argue with you, because I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man. However, because I do care about you, and think I can help you, I will offer a few observations.

First, perhaps you misunderstand my point. Maybe you were typing so fast in your last and prior posts that you overlooked my definition of lynchmobber. I am not attacking fair-minded, impartial, honest, truth devoted posters. No. I am being critical of those people who are irrationally judgmental, who leap to conclusions without supporting facts, who distort the facts and the truth, who are ready to convict upon an accusation being hurled, who care nothing about reason, fairness, justice, due process, or any of the things our founding fathers thought so very important to our society. Those people, the figurative rope bearers and torch carriers, are the ones I call lynchmobbers. They are the enemies of a free and just society. I intend to continue calling them out wherever they are found.

Why would you voluntarily see yourself as a member of that group? I didn’t use your name. YOU rushed forward, howling with indignation and feigned outrage. You say you won’t “stoop to name-calling,” as you claim I seem intent on doing? Really? I didn’t even refer to you in my post. But let’s see what you have flung at ME.“Arrogance,”“childish insults,”“obnoxious,”“grow up,”“ludicrous.” Hmmmm.

Maybe it is your avocation which has darkened your mind. I understand from your postings that you are evidently some form of cat-o-nine-tails wielder at a local penal facility.“What we got here is ..... vocalwhenaccessory.”

Before you respond with some knee-jerk reaction, take a deep breath and assess yourself. You ought to be on my side.

Your friend, Verity

So, the Judge cursed and swore at the officers because she felt obligated to know she was being investigated?? Last time I checked, that's now it works! What a stupid request!

Verity:

Everything in your last posting's definition of a "lynch-mobber" is based soley on your opinion and your opinion alone. That was the meat of my previous post. Yours is not the only opinion. You are to be respected for your opinion the same as others for theirs. My avocation, first and foremost has nothing to do with my posting on this subject, and frankly is none of your business. Your arrogance and insults to others are simply part of your self-serving demeanor and you have proven over and over again that you are not capable of and give and take on any subject while conversing with someone who doesn't agree with you. Who are you to decide who is irrationally judgmental and who is not? Do you not see my point? That was your opinion and nothing more. As far as your comment, "I am not attacking fair-minded, impartial, honest, truth devoted posters," again, your opinion on who is what. I should be on your side? When I decide that my opinion is the only one that matters, I'll give you a ring. Until then, have fun with what you're doing (as you obviously are) and try not to make too many people angry. There's no future in it. Other people matter also.

VWN

Well, I am very disappointed, vocalwhenaccessory. I expected more of you. Since it is obvious that there can’t be any rational discourse between us, I will spend my time just trying to help you.

First, please understand that the definition of “lynchmobber” which I gave you is NOT a matter of opinion. That word is a fanciful term which I coined, and which I own, to describe a specifically defined classification of people. There is no “opinion” involved in it.

You appear to operate under the fallacious notion that every comment by anyone is merely a matter of “opinion,” and that one “opinion” is as good as another.

You seem to apply this to every aspect of your “thinking.” You believe that facts can be distorted and misstated to make a point, because it is simply the expression of an “opinion” in your mind.

As an example, were you to face a statement by the National Academy of Weights and Measures that:“Our team has determined by experience and study that a liter of sand from Omaha Beach weighs 6 kilograms +/- 50 grams and contains 26 million individual grains +/- 300,000 grains,” your response would be,“Hey that is your opinion, and my opinion is that it contains 200 kilograms and 18 billion grains, and my opinion is as good as yours.”

Now, why should anyone even PRETEND that your statement was other than a piece of moronic fecal matter?

We have the same situation on this board where you have taken cavalier liberties with facts and either misstated or distorted them, and shown you have little, if any, ability to reason in a normal manner.

In your instance, I guess I should add to the definition of “lynchmobber,”“lazy and deceptive,” since I have discovered that you have been copying and pasting your nutty rants about me in other threads, where I would be unlikely to find them, or would have to go to great effort to respond to your calumnious patter, unless I adopted the same deceptive tactics, which I will not do.

As for your statement that:“My avocation, first and foremost has nothing to do with my posting on this subject, and frankly is none of your business,” well, that’s not exactly true either. First of all, I didn’t inject it into these boards. You did. You have posted a lot about yourself in other threads. Your avocation, as is anyone’s, bears upon the topic about which they are posting. It is like saying that it is insignificant that a poster on an animal rights board just happens to be the operator of the hydraulic shears on the kill floor of a slaughter house. You know better than that. Or I hope you do. No, as I think about it, I guess you don’t know.

Well, nevertheless, I will try to help you along as best I can, my good friend.

Verity is always here to assist.

Hi, Verity
I need your assistance.....in understanding how you accept some facts (ie your example of the weight of sand) and not others. It is a fact that a tape exists of Judge KCCG berating the GBI and other LE. I'm sorry, I must have missed the media reports of the "obvious rogue and runaway law enforcement". Can you direct me to the source so I can read that? Perhaps my opinion will change when I see "facts" to support this claim.....you see most of us can tell the difference between fact and fiction.

Verity posted to Vocal...."In your instance, I guess I should add to the definition of “lynchmobber,”“lazy and deceptive,” since I have discovered that you have been copying and pasting your nutty rants about me in other threads, where I would be unlikely to find them, or would have to go to great effort to respond to your calumnious patter, unless I adopted the same deceptive tactics, which I will not do."

If you will notice Verity, the post you made was post #94 under a thread of the same title as this thread. My response post to you was #96. If you are unlikely to find my posting two under yours in a thread, possibly you're not paying attention. Sorry if you think that's deceptive.

and

"Well, I am very disappointed, vocalwhenaccessory. I expected more of you. Since it is obvious that there can’t be any rational discourse between us, I will spend my time just trying to help you."

I'm disappointed it took you so long to figure out there is never going to be a rational give and take between us. I recognize the fact that the person I talk to has his/her own opinion and respect them for that fact. I won't always agree with them, but I WILL respect them. There are no doubt times when I will recognize an error in my reasoning on a certain subject and concur with the other person. This however, is not one of those times. As far a "needing" or "wanting" your help goes, I'd much rather spend my time basking in my own stupidity.

Concerned Citizen. You asked Verity (and thanks for your question), "I'm sorry, I must have missed the media reports of the "obvious rogue and runaway law enforcement". Can you direct me to the source so I can read that?" Well, he/she as you know, won't be able to grant your request. There's 2 simple reasons for that.#1, the reports don't exist.#2, as I've already stated, HIS opinion and his alone, other than those who wish to follow his anti-law enforcement propaganda.

Verity, I'll tell you what I'll do. Against my better judgment, I'm going to end this conflict we seem to be having. There is never going to be any neutral ground on which we can meet. My responses to you are over. And, before you say it, NO it's not about getting in the last word. Post what you will after this. I expect it from you. I'll have much more fun sitting back and watching you make a fool out of yourself.

VWN

Vocal, I hate to see you go before you are cured, but I do understand why you find it necessary to cut and run.

But with your parting carping quip, you almost made it necessary that I add the term “liar” to the individualized profile I have for you. Naturally, a kinder, gentler Verity will not do that. No point in hurling a stone at you as you skulk off into the darkness. However, I will help you once more to understand the point.

In your farewell address, you defend against my statement that you were cutting and pasting your prattle about me on other boards by claiming that on the other board you were replying to one of my posts on THAT board. Wrong. Look again. You PASTED on that board a response you posted here to my post on THIS board. Now you claim you didn’t. About the only defense I can see for you to this charge is temporary insanity. But.... the point is minor as you are withdrawing from the field.

I am embarrassed for you, however, that you so easily got sucked into concerned citizen’s little deceptive ploy. If I thought you were simply pretending to not understand it so that the two of you could gang up on poor Verity, I could grasp your motivation, although I would not approve of the tactic. However, I really believe you bought into it fully.

I tried to help you, but to no avail. Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio,,,,,

Verity,

Just out of curiosity, do you think Judge Graham acted improperly? I know you understand that when I use improperly, I'm asking in these terms:

1.) Improper as in broke the law?
2.) Improper as in violated the canons of ethics?
3.) Improperly digressed from social and/or moral standards?

Verity,
I've never been called deceptive before. Deceptive = the act of deceit. Deceit = a lie, a dishonest act or trick. What lie or dishonest act or trick are you accusing me of? Do I get my day in court or will you just lynch me?
Judge KCCG is now seeing what others "being investigated" have gone through. LE does not notify people that they are being investigated. Why would she think she should be? Not everybody that has been investigated has been guilty. Remember "Knoctoberfest?" Peoples homes were violated without search warrants and to the best of my memory they did not net any drug arrests out of it. I think someone should be concerned over the "police" that (suppossedly) notified her that her name was being tossed around in an investigation. Let's get back to "deceptive". I believe that LE is deceptive at times, I believe that lawyers are deceptive most of the time, and I believe that you, Verity, are deceptive all of the time.

Se-verity, the Magician? All seeing? All knowing? A deceiver? Smoke and mirrors! Nonetheless, You are in the center ring.

concerned citizen wrote:

Verity,
I've never been called deceptive before. Deceptive = the act of deceit. Deceit = a lie, a dishonest act or trick. What lie or dishonest act or trick are you accusing me of? Do I get my day in court or will you just lynch me?
Judge KCCG is now seeing what others "being investigated" have gone through. LE does not notify people that they are being investigated. Why would she think she should be? Not everybody that has been investigated has been guilty. Remember "Knoctoberfest?" Peoples homes were violated without search warrants and to the best of my memory they did not net any drug arrests out of it. I think someone should be concerned over the "police" that (suppossedly) notified her that her name was being tossed around in an investigation. Let's get back to "deceptive". I believe that LE is deceptive at times, I believe that lawyers are deceptive most of the time, and I believe that you, Verity, are deceptive all of the time.

Just a quick reply to your post.
The "koctoberfest" that you are referring too did net several arrest with the confiscation of several pounds of illegal drugs to the best of my memory. Further more the people’s rights and homes were not violated in any manner as they consensually agreed for LE to search for drugs by signing written consents to have LE search their homes before being searched.
Why is it always the police that are blamed for everything when the people breaking the law are at fault? In addition, it wasn’t the police that told KCCG that information, it was a lawyer.

Charlie
I'm not in the know about who told what - "Deal" (in the very first post) is the one who said that it was a "police" that told her. Was drugs found in every home that was searched? NO - I know this for a fact. I am not blaming the police for anything. I'm just saying that everyone the police investigate based on information they receive is not guilty - and yes I would feel that my home had been violated if the police searched it based on informant information and I was innocent. BTW, how do you know it was a lawyer that told her?

concerned citizen wrote:

Charlie
I'm not in the know about who told what - "Deal" (in the very first post) is the one who said that it was a "police" that told her. Was drugs found in every home that was searched? NO - I know this for a fact. I am not blaming the police for anything. I'm just saying that everyone the police investigate based on information they receive is not guilty - and yes I would feel that my home had been violated if the police searched it based on informant information and I was innocent. BTW, how do you know it was a lawyer that told her?

Just because drugs weren't found at moment police searched doesn't mean the people are not drug dealers. Drug dealers do run out of supplies from time to time. Should I assume Kroger never sells Coke Zero because they were out when I tried to buy some today??

I'd like to see both of these two verbose nitwits shut up and deal with the issue at hand. Why does a judge feel it is her right to know if she is being investigated?

Amen to that: Judges are not some sort of magically honest people. Most of them are very political. Most are appointed, and of course that means politics. Someone correct me if I am wrong but I believe Judge Cook-Connelly was appointed in the beginning. Judges, according to many should be bi-partisan, a member of no political party. We all Know that is flat-out not true. A Lie for those of you who like that terminology better. Judges are by-law not very powerful, their job description would amaze the average person. That is compared to the power they have taken and refuse to give up. We have Judges trying cases from the bench, prosecuting those in disfavor and defending those they like. Judge Cook-Connelly is only one of many who have abused their power.

The best thing I have read on this site is in the form of a question "Why does a Judge feel it is his/her right to know if they are being investigated. Judges are protected from lawsuits, but they are not protected from breaking the Law. They can get away with Judicial Murder, They can give off the wall sentences if they are feeling bad that day, but they cannot break the law and get away with it forever. News Flash: Expect more Judges to be investigated and some might even go to jail. My Opinion.