Peter King calls Michael Jackson 'child molester'

King isn't alone. Most people called M.J. a child molester as well as many other things.

The Christian Right in action again. The fact that Rep. King is using this to get votes means that he doesn't have a platform? To say that he is a pedophile, rapist when he wasn't convicted in a court of law means that he doesn't respect the court of law. Really pathetic when a grown man/politician gets caught up in YouTube to make a point to get votes.(lol)

MJ declared to the world in a 60 Minutes interview that he enjoyed bringing little boys into bed with him at Neverland.

OK, pamiety, now just what do you think he was?

While many won't disagree with Mr. King, isn't this political suicide?

King is 100% correct. If MJ didn't molest young boys then why did he pay them off? Just because MJ wasn't found guilty, doesn't mean he didn't do it. OJ Simpson got away with murder also.

Peter King is saying what most of us have already said. While Jackson was a talented person, he ruined his image by his deranged actions. He was a perv, a pedophile and a wacko. The coverage of his death is way overblown and the suggestion by race baiter Al Sharpton that there be a national day of mourning is just way beyond absurd. This whole thing is surreal and it's only getting worse.

Good for King. Political correctness is terrorism of the intellect.

Who would give a child 20 million or more if there was absolutely no chance that there had been any contact?

Pat from babylon wrote:

King is 100% correct. If MJ didn't molest young boys then why did he pay them off? Just because MJ wasn't found guilty, doesn't mean he didn't do it. OJ Simpson got away with murder also.

If your child was molested is there any amout of money that would make you not continue with the charges? The parents could have gone through with the case and got paid . The second child's parents, if you knew someone had been accused of sexual conduct with a child, would you let your child spend the night or even be left alone with that person?

Think about it.

..And one little boy described MJ's genitals including birth marks during trial.

pamiety wrote:

The Christian Right in action again. The fact that Rep. King is using this to get votes means that he doesn't have a platform? To say that he is a pedophile, rapist when he wasn't convicted in a court of law means that he doesn't respect the court of law. Really pathetic when a grown man/politician gets caught up in YouTube to make a point to get votes.(lol)

And you are with the Athiest Left??? A fan of Nancy Pelosi, are you? Pete King said what he believed and there are many of us who agree with him. This nation has become too politically correct.

Once again, Peter King seems to be the only Congressmen with the cajones to say what needs to be said. He's only speaking the truth.

I for one am also sick of hearing about this pervert day in and day out for the past 2 weeks. Get over it.

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
And you are with the Athiest Left??? A fan of Nancy Pelosi, are you? Pete King said what he believed and there are many of us who agree with him. This nation has become too politically correct.

I am a Democrat and also I'm a Christian. The difference I believe with me and some of the right is that I follow the teachings of the Bible. I follow the ten commandments one of them being 'not to bear false witness'.

As far as politically correct I'm a black female and I dare someone to call me a 'ni**%$ b!#c% to my face especially at my job.

When did King stop drinking?

Pat from babylon wrote:

King is 100% correct. If MJ didn't molest young boys then why did he pay them off? Just because MJ wasn't found guilty, doesn't mean he didn't do it. OJ Simpson got away with murder also.

A pay off was all they wanted in the first place. The jury found him not guilty and so did they the same for O.J, but you racist bastards can't live with that, so you make your own verdict. Actually, who gives a shit what you believe.

pamiety wrote:

<quoted text>
I am a Democrat and also I'm a Christian. The difference I believe with me and some of the right is that I follow the teachings of the Bible. I follow the ten commandments one of them being 'not to bear false witness'.
As far as politically correct I'm a black female and I dare someone to call me a 'ni**%$ b!#c% to my face especially at my job.

Your race has nothing to do with the discussion. What is relevant is that Jackson was a wacko and he doesn't deserve all this coverage.

Carolyn wrote:

<quoted text>
JUST one little boy is ONE to MANY..GLAD HE IS DEAD.

And the little boy was once again allowed back on the Neverland Ranch with Michael Jackson.

Colorblind wrote:

Who would give a child 20 million or more if there was absolutely no chance that there had been any contact?

Who would accept 20million dollars in exchange for justice? An extortionist. Case closed.

Who is Peter King?

I have to agree with you pamiety. How does anyone know for certain if he really did do the things he was accused of? We don't unless we were there and to publicly make these statements, is really typical of most christian rightwingers. They only make themselves look ignorant by judging others.

Peter Kings entire statement is hypocritical. For the only way he could have possibly come to his conclusion of believing Michael was guilty, was by forming that opionion based on what he was fed through the media. Was he there when it happened?

This is why so many prisoners are falsley convicted and some of them even murdered.