Judged:
3
2
2
And so the feigned sentiment goes, a manufactured crisis, a synthesized rallying cry for "equality"
They have the same right to marry as straights, they just want to redefine it, by radically altering a sacred, fundamental societal construct in place for millenia - cheapening and tainting God's defining of it.
Traditional marriage has always been the cornerstone of society - the nuclear family.
When we radically alter this sacred institution and meddle with it's delicate meaning regarding the Traditional Family, we open a very radical, forbidden door that leaves society eternally tainted, devalued.
The depraved activists behind this movement are public relations aces, crassly riding the victimhood coattails of other historically oppressed groups, hijacking the language of their noble plights. Unlike them, gays lack any tangible merit confirming their identity. People leave homosexuality all the time.
Gay activists are revolutionaries.
Don't believe revolutionaries when they hold forth about their intention of building paradise on earth. Actually, they would be unable to build anything even if they wanted to. Their talk about the bright future is mere lip service, because in reality, any revolution is exclusively about destruction, with very little thought given to what will happen afterward ("we'll cross that bridge when we come to it"). But how do you go about destroying society? Where do you direct the blow so it will do the most damage? In his Theses on Feuerbach, Karl Marx provided the answer: destroy the traditional family.
True to the teachings of their prophet, socialist revolutionaries have placed the destruction of matrimony high on their list of priorities. Social upheavals have always opened the floodgates of debauchery and pornography. The socialist revolution brings about a breakdown of social conventions, with "sexual liberation" regarded as part of the overall drive for freedom. But while the rabble yearns to throw off the yoke of moral strictures to give vent to its animal passions, the revolutionary leaders see moral decay as a means of undermining the bulwark of the social structure -- the family.
Gay marriage also affords them a binding, incontrovertable legal/societal status, a kind of State-sanctioned sanctitiy that will make it near-impossible to take official objection to their tireless, reckless activism. Indeed this group is drunk with power, running roughshod over values, tradition, and the Constitution.
Their progress in the Culture has always been accompanied by sophisticated falsehoods, devious propaganda, and sleazy, brute-force politics.
They'll cry you a river (of crocodile tears) and then turn around bankrupt innocent people, setting them up for frivilous lawsuits to make examples of them to force society to capitulate to their fickle, depraved demands.
With their tremendous, immense political clout, gays could easily attain matrimonial assets enjoyed by married couples (i.e., hospital visitations, inheritance issues, social security benefits, etc.) but that's not what this activism is about.
They want it ALL, they want to RULE, and they want people who dissagree with them thrown in JAIL.
The "gay marriage" thing is but a front, a public-relations bit that fits seamlessly into their victimhood narrative.
Semantics, platitudes, mantras, and euphemisms - they've mastered the propaganda arena.
They'll hold up a rare example of a perennially- committed gay couple and try to sell it as typiclal - like finding the few, unblemished apples on a diseased, tainted, pest-ridden fruit tree and bragging to people how good your harvest will be. Gays rarely seek domestic longevity.
They talk a good talk.
How easily spoonfed are you?
Aries