Palin - running scared

What about Sarah Palin quitting her Governor Seat? She must have some skeletons in her closet???

Thankful wrote:

What about Sarah Palin quitting her Governor Seat? She must have some skeletons in her closet???

You better hope so. You probably won't like the alternative.

dilbert wrote:

<quoted text>You better hope so. You probably won't like the alternative.

Such as dedicating her free time to campaigning for presidency? She's getting a headstart if she is.

Muffin C wrote:

<quoted text>
Such as dedicating her free time to campaigning for presidency? She's getting a headstart if she is.

I sure would like to trade the prez we've got for her before he burdens my kids with anymore debt. He's ruining this nation.

I am pretty sure they have already pulled as much out of her closet as they could and I haven't heard of anything that even comes close to being as scary and underhanded as the stuff that just keeps coming out of Obama's closet, but don't worry the liberal media won't focus on his skeletons!! YES, Dan our kids and grandkids and their kids are going to be paying for his decisions!! WAKE UP AMERICA and enjoy celebrating Independence Day while you still can because with our socialist government by next year we will be celebrating tax day!!

We'll be celebrating the 1 day a year that our money ISN'T being taken...that's all that will be left.

We are rapidly moving towards the point at which all our earnings go to DC...then they give us back what they think we "should" have.

Complain? What's wrong...don't you want to "help" other people?

Keep what you make b/c you worked for it? What...you're not going to be "greedy" are you?

Isn't this great?

This economy is where it is because of Bush not Obama. Obama is trying to get us out of the mess he caused!

Thankful wrote:

This economy is where it is because of Bush not Obama. Obama is trying to get us out of the mess he caused!

This started way before Bush.

Thankful wrote:

This economy is where it is because of Bush not Obama. Obama is trying to get us out of the mess he caused!

Yeah, I heard that too.

Seriously, before a 70 something year old senator who can't wipe his own ass picked her as a running mate who on here ever heard of Sarah Palin? Before that I never knew Alaska had anything there but screwed up daylight hours, moose and not enough women. As for screwing up the country I am waiting for people to pull their head from their ass and realize that HEY, THE COUNTRY ALREADY IS SCREWED!!! For those of you who still have a job and can pay your bills, great. But in 2 years come on back on here and repost the same crap because by then you will be the poor one. Then again, skid row doesn't have an Internet hotspot so in that case go steal a bottle of cheap mad dog 20/20.

Thankful wrote:

This economy is where it is because of Bush not Obama. Obama is trying to get us out of the mess he caused!

Keep your ears plugged up and keep on chanting your Obama Mantra.

You forget, the Damocrat's controlling the Congress for Bush's last two years of his 2nd term.

You also forget Congress forgetting to make sure Barney Frank was doing his job.

You are also forgetting the Damocratically controlled Congress forced banks to make Home Mortgage Loans and issue Credit Cards to millions of people who were NOT credit worthy. John McCain was warning people several years before this happened but no one listened.

How quickly people forget.

Well, it looks like this thread started out about Sarah Palin but has veered off into another Obama/Bush debate. Sarah Palin has resigned, which is her right. If she decides to run for president, that is her right, too. If I decide to vote for her, my family has promised to have me committed.(Sorry, I couldn't resist that one.)

You know, we could spend the rest of our lives debating which president did this or did that. I think we all know that ALL of them have done some good things, some terrible things, some brilliant things, and some downright boneheaded things. At the end of the day, those things don't matter; what matters is that someone does the right things NOW. We can, and will, disagree on what the right things are, but I don't think that either declaring an administration a success or a failure without seeing the effects of its policies does any good.

By the way, that "Damocratic majority" from 2007 to 2009 was NEVER a veto-proof majority. In fact, in the Senate it was 49 Democrats, 49 Republicans, and 2 Independents. In the House, the majority was 236 Democrats and 199 Republicans. The only Bush vetoes overridden by Congress required several Republican votes.

Devilman wrote:

Seriously, before a 70 something year old senator who can't wipe his own ass picked her as a running mate who on here ever heard of Sarah Palin? Before that I never knew Alaska had anything there but screwed up daylight hours, moose and not enough women.

But you WERE familiar with the community organizer from Chicago who is now the Leader of the Free World? Sell it somewhere else.

Ex-Vol in FL wrote:

Well, it looks like this thread started out about Sarah Palin but has veered off into another Obama/Bush debate. Sarah Palin has resigned, which is her right. If she decides to run for president, that is her right, too. If I decide to vote for her, my family has promised to have me committed.(Sorry, I couldn't resist that one.)
You know, we could spend the rest of our lives debating which president did this or did that. I think we all know that ALL of them have done some good things, some terrible things, some brilliant things, and some downright boneheaded things. At the end of the day, those things don't matter; what matters is that someone does the right things NOW. We can, and will, disagree on what the right things are, but I don't think that either declaring an administration a success or a failure without seeing the effects of its policies does any good.
By the way, that "Damocratic majority" from 2007 to 2009 was NEVER a veto-proof majority. In fact, in the Senate it was 49 Democrats, 49 Republicans, and 2 Independents. In the House, the majority was 236 Democrats and 199 Republicans. The only Bush vetoes overridden by Congress required several Republican votes.

Another site I just checked put the House at 233 Democrats and 202 Republicans from 2007-2009, an even slimmer majority.

""This started way before Bush""

Sure did: it started when the Republicans took control of the House in 1994. Then the Republicans got it all in 2000 along with 9/11 that got them way too much public trust.

Go back to the 1910's and 30's and check out where the Republicans were in the Stock Market bubble of the 20's and Nazi appeasement during the 30's and 40/s

I hope Palin does run. She has my vote!! This country needs more people like her. I firmly believe the democrats and big three news stations are afraid of her and what she stands to bring to this great nation. They should also be afraid in 2010 when they loose control of the House and Senate!!! If they keep us going in this direction, there will absolutely be some upsets in the next elections!!

she should now go down to Honduras and meet with the constitutional government. Then praise their efforts to protect the constitution and compare that to what is happening in America.

Nothing wrong with Palin quitting before her term was over to concentrate on 2012. Zero quit as senator right after he was elected to run for president.

Oh, wait. He didn’t actually quit. He showed up for a dozen or so votes, but I guess he did still collect his full senatorial salary while campaigning full-time for pres.

Oh there is a God!

Ex-Vol in FL wrote:

Well, it looks like this thread started out about Sarah Palin but has veered off into another Obama/Bush debate. Sarah Palin has resigned, which is her right. If she decides to run for president, that is her right, too. If I decide to vote for her, my family has promised to have me committed.(Sorry, I couldn't resist that one.)
You know, we could spend the rest of our lives debating which president did this or did that. I think we all know that ALL of them have done some good things, some terrible things, some brilliant things, and some downright boneheaded things. At the end of the day, those things don't matter; what matters is that someone does the right things NOW. We can, and will, disagree on what the right things are, but I don't think that either declaring an administration a success or a failure without seeing the effects of its policies does any good.
By the way, that "Damocratic majority" from 2007 to 2009 was NEVER a veto-proof majority. In fact, in the Senate it was 49 Democrats, 49 Republicans, and 2 Independents. In the House, the majority was 236 Democrats and 199 Republicans. The only Bush vetoes overridden by Congress required several Republican votes.

This was a good post, seriously. But honestly, do you really think anyone here really gives a shit?

Seriously. Most educated minds are so educated they become indoctrinated into the hype and if I remember correctly, you teach this hype.

I say we go to a yahoo or paltalk program so I can see who i am talking to. You game, or scared of the Devil....

Why can't we stop saying who did what and start from a NEW point A and go from there?

You people sound like a bunch of mindless crybabies, really you do. Next thing you know is you used to hear good until you daddy slapped you up along side the head thus causing you to lose your hearing. Get real people. You best learn it now and stop this piss and moan sessions.