Soldiers Killing a Sheep with a Metal Baseball Bat

so you care about a fetus and the pain from being ripped from the womb? or you cannot hear the cry so it is ok?

gentlemen let us eat...fetus on the buffet

LET US KILL THE UNBORN AS ACTUALLY SAYS IT IS NOT INHUMANE TO DO THIS!!!

he has spoken:O)

your normal antagonizes sit in awe as i tear your double standard arse up and down this worthless page... save the fetus it is not human to hoover them out!!

save the goat it shall be beat with a wooden bat (metal is so harsh) you are a joke:(

there is nothing humane about being killed ask anyone that has been shot, stabbed, beat, etc... it hurts..

drugged...no pain right?? so you say... it hurts

Starvin Marvin wrote:

so you care about a fetus and the pain from being ripped from the womb? or you cannot hear the cry so it is ok?
gentlemen let us eat...fetus on the buffet

When did this become an abortion forum zippy?

Can't defend inhumane treatment of animals so you turn it to abortion?

LMAO

so when we put the abortionof a human on utube you will defend the helpless? i like to eat them so it must be ok right? you have no basis you can't even defend your own kind i don't know zip, cheiro, bds, jimmy (ok actually i know him he is a loser), however to defend a helpless animal and not extend the favor to an unborn human or unborn goat is just wrong

question: if i show me pulling an unborn lamb out of the ewe's vag would you have a prob with it? i have the hoof print from the ewe giving consent. i then take a rubber (takes longer to kill than metal) bat and beat the lamb until i think i'm ready to eat... what say you?

keep steppin' in it they are listening

If you view the welfare of a goat as more important than that of a human fetus then I cannot debate with you any longer because you have already made up your mind and I have lost.

The goat must die...harshly if it must...but let us defend the truly helpless.

to steal a quote i must...

There's no earthly way of knowing. Which direction we are going. There's no knowing where we're rowing. Or which way the river's flowing. Is it raining? Is it snowing? Is a hurricane a-blowing? Not a speck of light is showing.So the danger must be growing. Are the fires of hell a-glowing? Is the grisly reaper mowing? Yes! The danger must be growing. For the rowers keep on rowing. And they're certainly not showing. Any signs that they are slowing!- Willy Wonka

have a good night...if you can

Me, I would rather save the bullet to protect myself in a hostile country.
It is BS you have to create a Google account to even watch this so I didn't but it still does not change my opinion so I will go off of what Dean Gamble said.
Unless it was a soldier doing swinging the bat, shut up about it. Even if it was a soldier swinging the bat, shut up about it. You cry no matter how an animal is dispatched.
You all don't scream when a person is beheaded.
And notice the original posters name. PETA. That says it all. Why don't you go back to locking yourself in a cage on State St if a sheep is all you are worried about.
BTW: PETA = People for the Eating Of Tasty Animals

Our soldiers are already densenstized to killing so slaughtering animals is child's play to them, this is what will happen when martial law is declared and these same soldiers are granted power by the state to do whatever they want to whomever they want, then the bloodbath really begins, just as it began in Germany, Croatia and all over the East Asia throughout the 20th century...

cheirio wrote:

Hey actually, let me tell you how some cows are killed for food....they hit the said cow right between the lookers with a sledgehammer....end of cow. Now step up and let us see if we can do that to you with one blow...it won't hurt, just one good swipe....only way you would feel it is if you had a brain. You might have a bit of a headache for one second. With you, no brains no headache...end of story. LMAO this is too easy.

You finally got one right imbecile. One shot with a sledgehammer one kill.... a HUMANE way to kill an animal. Did you see one shot one kill in that video dipshyt?

Are you really this stupid or do you have to work at it?

ActuaIIy wrote:

<quoted text>
You finally got one right imbecile. One shot with a sledgehammer one kill.... a HUMANE way to kill an animal. Did you see one shot one kill in that video dipshyt?
Are you really this stupid or do you have to work at it?

They should try this with chimps,save ammo.

It's unfortunate but a percentage of US soldiers are losers that signed up because they have nothing else going for them.

harley wrote:

<quoted text>They should try this with chimps,save ammo.

Spoke like a true racist POS

Woo-Jin wrote:

Our soldiers are already densenstized to killing so slaughtering animals is child's play to them, this is what will happen when martial law is declared and these same soldiers are granted power by the state to do whatever they want to whomever they want, then the bloodbath really begins, just as it began in Germany, Croatia and all over the East Asia throughout the 20th century...

No Name wrote:

It's unfortunate but a percentage of US soldiers are losers that signed up because they have nothing else going for them.

Let's see. Who would declare martial law? Not the states but President Obama, that's who. And you all want to vote him in again.
Why would he be able to not do that? Because of the Second Amendment. Unless he signs that away with the stroke of his pen like the gun ban people and the U.N. want him to. Even then, he is not getting my guns.

The members of our military are not going to turn on us. It will not happen.

Now for the loser comment. You are an a$$hole. This is a comment from someone that is too chicken to serve in the military. Some of the finest people I know have served. Some of the finest people in the U.S.A. serve now. You have no idea what having to serve in those conditions over there can do to a person. I have no idea what those things are doing to them but for what I hear.

So lets see. Being shot at, being shot, being blown up, being tortured if caught by enemy that is fanatical, being beheaded. But you don't care what sacrifices they and their families are undergoing. This I can tell by your posts. While I am sure you will find a few below par, do not put them all in that boat. Every person that has served ever has made our country the greatest in the world.

Maybe you need to go to Iran where I am sure they would love your unpatriotic views. Or are you just going to wait for them to come here?

The next time you see a person that has served our country or is serving our country, why don't you tell them and their families what a looser you think they are. Do you have the balls? Probably not.

So, who is the real looser?

BTW, going by your spelling, you probably couldn't pass the entrance exam to even get in the military.

And yes, I used "loser" when referring to your comment originally. Because "loser" refers to how your brain cell are apparently packed in your head.

wouldratherdoit wrote:

And yes, I used "loser" when referring to your comment originally. Because "loser" refers to how your brain cell are apparently packed in your head.

That would be spelled LOOSER dumb ass

ActuaIIy wrote:

<quoted text>
Spoke like a true racist POS

I'm not racist,I just hate useless -iggers.

wouldratherdoit wrote:

<quoted text><quoted text>So, who is the real looser?

This is what I was referring to DumbA$$. Unfortunately I dropped an O there. Long hours of snowplowing got to me.

cheirio wrote:

<quoted text>I didn't watch the video...I made a comment and mentioned no bullet. You are the idiot and didn't really read my post. But just the same, let me give you one swipe with a sledghammer...I don't think you would feel a thing....as I said, you have no brain thus, no headache. LMAO you are an idiot.

Understood - you ARE really that stupid. You blowhole defending a position on a video you admit you never watched

LMAO was a dipshyt little girl

you defend the position to kill children yet you have never watched them be killed "live" in the room?

"Judge dismisses suit accusing SeaWorld of enslaving whales."

"(Reuters)- A federal judge on Wednesday threw out an animal rights group's lawsuit accusing SeaWorld of enslaving captive killer whales, ruling that orcas had no standing to seek the same constitutional rights as people.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, had accused the chain of aquatic theme parks of violating the rights of whales under the 13th Amendent of the U.S. Constitution, which abolished slavery in the United States.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Diego, listed five performing orcas at SeaWorld's parks in California and Florida - Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka and Ulises - as plaintiffs in the complaint.

"The only reasonable interpretation of the 13th Amendment's plain language is that it applies to persons, and not to non-persons such as orcas," U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Miller wrote in his ruling.

"Both historic and contemporary sources reveal that the term 'slavery' and 'involuntary servitude' refer only to persons," the judge added.

The 13th Amendment was enacted in 1865, the year the U.S. Civil War ended.

Legal experts previously denounced as frivolous the PETA lawsuit, which had sought a court order requiring SeaWorld to release the five killer whales to a "suitable habitat."

David Steinberg, a professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, told Reuters when the lawsuit was filed in October that it was "demeaning (to) the integrity and humanity of people who were owned as slaves."

Virginia-based PETA has staked out a number of controversial positions in the past, in seeking to advance the cause of animal rights.

In 2003, the Anti-Defamation League accused PETA of trivializing the deaths of Jews in World War Two with a campaign that compared the meat industry to the Holocaust.

Colleen O'Brien, a spokeswoman for PETA, said in a statement that her organization would regroup as a result of the dismissal of what it called "this historic first case" on behalf of orcas.

"Today's decision does not change the fact that the orcas who once lived naturally wild and free, are today kept as slaves by SeaWorld," O'Brien said.

Miller said in his ruling that animals did have legal rights under state and federal statutes, including criminal laws.

He added the "goal" of PETA attorneys who brought the lawsuit "to protect the welfare of orcas is laudable," even if the 13th Amendment was not the correct way to approach the case.

(Reporting By Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Peter Cooney)"