Doctor heads to court after online sex sting

Zhwayfe wrote:

Don't any of you bloggers have books to read or family to hang with? It boggles the mind that you all have probably spent more time on the Internet about things predatory and sexual than that creep Wolin. And the way you all exchange tidbits about predators makes me wonder if you are all predators or predator wanna-bees.
I cannot believe that you all of the time and inclination to go on and on about this. Makes me wonder what your own personal pathology is, and if any of you are employed.
Sheesh!

THESE ARE THE SAME GUY.... DR BALDO

Yahoo! Message Boards > Business & Finance > Investments > Stocks (A to Z) > Stocks Q > QLT Inc.(QLTI)
posted by Bioinvest99 (the email used by Wolin on all the dating sites

Re: Maurice Wolin - I feel for his family 2-Nov-06 09:22 am Could it be that the whole story hasn't been told? That perhaps the media, which setup this sting, hasn't told the entire story because that might hurt their ratings? The presumption of innocence appears to have been abandoned in favor of a lurid, roman-circus type spectacle. Why have a justice system when trial by television is much more satisfying?

Shocked in SF, where are the text messages from Wolin?

Yeah, that's him. And yes, he posts under a number of aliases in this thread (Bob, Zhwayfe, Ringlet etc.). Thing is, you immediatly know it's Maurice when someone posts from a random location outside the US because that random location is where his proxy server is located at that time. Maurice uses proxies because he thinks we would immediatly know it's him if he reveals his true location. Instead we immediately know it's him when someone uses a proxy. In any case, it's nice that the subject of this thread is present himself and takes part so actively in the discussion :-)

If Maurice dislikes the trial by television so much why is he so afraid to face a jury. He could have plead his case before a jury a long time ago. Instead he chose to delay at every corner. Apparently he doesn't have the balls to face a jury. Anyway, something doesn't add up in his reasoning.

Off topic:

http://nl.youtube.com/watch...

Comment:
Finally! Jeremy Todd West, the fat fuck at the beginning who's been driving the same truck since I went to high school with him in 1997 got sentenced on July 17th, to 3 years and 10 months in a federal, Pound-Me-In-The-Ass Prison. Also, 7 years supervised probation. He was on the high school football team, so I'm sure he's used to gay encounters. It should be a walk in the park for him.

New career opportunity for Mo?

07/02/08: Doctor Admits Sex With Un...

From psychiatrist to... p......

http://www.perverted-justice.com/...

Brittle Fingers wrote:

Shocked in SF, where are the text messages from Wolin?

My friend does not want me to post any of their communication, she recieved a disturbing anonymous email..... it is obvious that Wolin bastard is on this site.

all I can say is Wolin is a sick bastard... and we have been advised to let the police handle my friends complaint and not discuss this any of the specifics

this thread does scare the crap out of wolin!! And Wolin dont bother using one of your many aliases to argue, challange or use stupid banter to discredit what I am accusing you of..... Rot in Hell Wolin

I've never believed that Wolin himself has posted on this thread.....I've joked about 'Bob' being Wolin, but I've never actually believed it. But just in case Wolin is here checking and posting on this thread, I will speak directly to him here:

Mr. Wolin, if I were you I'd be scared sh1tless. I've been on the wrong side of the law before, and even though my offense was very different and less serious, I can sorta identify with you. I say this because when you were in the police trailer and said, "I've never done anything before in my life", I could identify with your mindset. I felt the same way.....I hadn't done anything before -- not even a speeding ticket -- so why couldn't they just let me go? I didn't belong in handcuffs. I wasn't a criminal like the others.

Those are the thoughts I repeated to myself over and over for a couple of days after my arrest. I even thought about fighting the charge, but reality set in and I knew there was no chance of beating it. Besides, if you plead not guilty and are convicted, the penalty would be much, much worse.

Eventually, I reached the stage of acceptance. I realized there was no true way out of it -- I just had to go through it. I really think this is what you should have done. In fact, you can still do it.

Your case is very interesting though because you are now the face of PJ's and TCAP's opposition. The rest of the TCAP stingees are watching and hoping that you're successful. On the other side, there is an online watchdog group that is essentially undefeated.

For your own sake, I hope this experience somehow makes you a better person. I know mine did for me. I also wish the best for your family.

But if you do get convicted.....to quote Peter's neighbor from Office Space, "Watch your cornhole, dude".

Brittle Fingers wrote:

Shocked in SF, where are the text messages from Wolin?

That is another thing that Zhwayfe is referring to, probably...right?

Bob wrote:

Convicted sex offender nabbed in NBC sting gets lesser charge
TOMS RIVER — A Pennsylvania man sentenced to three years in prison after being nabbed in Dateline NBC's 'To Catch a Predator' series has been permitted to withdraw his guilty plea and admit guilt to a lesser charge.
Superior Court Judge Barbara A. Villano accepted a motion filed by the attorney representing Howard Thornton III, 28 — who has been incarcerated since being snared in the online sting in March 2007 — to vacate the plea entered by the Danielsville, Pa., man earlier this year.
Prosecutors began offering defendants the chance to have their charges downgraded in a letter to defense attorneys on May 30 of this year, two days after the attorneys appeared before Villano seeking information about how the sting was conducted and what the relationship was between the Prosecutor's Office, "Dateline" producers and Perverted Justice, the California-based nonprofit organization whose decoys conducted the online chat sessions.
Thornton's attorney, Deputy Assistant Public Defender Michael Vito, said he could not comment on why the reduced plea was offered, but said it was important for the same terms to be extended to his client.
http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article...

you gotta wonder what others are thinking:

-what was the one little thing that I could do so this can happen to me?
-if only i could get the same thing so I can have my charges reduced.
-> wonder how many of the others (closer in age) are probably true when they say they will never do this again...
->)}even if they changed the minds and wanted to talk to the kid, the chat log gets them in trouble.
> kinda AKIN to the John Holmes murders. He was there, but found not guilty because the lawyer was able to convince the jury that he was there but was 'the man in the middle', but in the next 8 years till his death, the police never questioned Holmes again for some reason.
-=WHAT LITTLE THING happened to get the charges reduced?
+= Legal Technicality?
_-_- "If I only did this, I could get my charges reduced?"

-methods come into question?
-Controversey...
-Media...
-What???

PSYCHO wrote:

<quoted text>
you gotta wonder what others are thinking:

What was going on underground that got the DA to back off? It is extremely rare to reduce a prison sentence and it is only done for very good reason.

So what was going on? Let's hope someone sticks it out and doesn't take a "good deal" of lifetime punishment termed regulations and takes it all the way so we can learn what they are hiding.

There's something the DA doesn't want public. There is apparently something "Dateline" doesn't want public.

Psycho, i'm curious about you. I mean no offense, so please don't take it that way, and please don't feel obliged to respond if you don't want to, but i'm just struck by a sort of 'disconnected' quality that I see in your posts. Are you aware of it? I find it perplexing, but interesting. I would like to discuss it with you a little if you don't mind.

Bob wrote:

<quoted text>
What was going on underground that got the DA to back off? It is extremely rare to reduce a prison sentence and it is only done for very good reason.
So what was going on?

Although I believe that those who showed up to these houses are obviously guilty to one extent or another, I still they should be treated fairly in accordance with the law. I agree it's strange that the prosecutors backed down a bit to, it would seem, avoid full disclosure of the details of the sting.

PJ has always said that it is never the decoys which initiate the sexual conversation. If there is something to hide in all of this, that's the area I would be most suspicious of.

Shocked in SF wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend does not want me to post any of their communication, she recieved a disturbing anonymous email..... it is obvious that Wolin bastard is on this site... All I can say is Wolin is a sick bastard... and we have been advised to let the police handle my friends complaint and not discuss this any of the specifics

Wowie! The Wolin case has become just as riveting outside the courtroom as it is inside.'Must remember to check the transcript from Wolin's arraignment to see if the judge restricted his Internet communications to work-related use only as a condition for bail...

Shocked in SF wrote:

all I can say is Wolin is a sick bastard... and we have been advised to let the police handle my friends complaint and not discuss this any of the specifics

Mo is using psywar/psyops stuff. Just relax because he will not do a damn thing. Get some decent advice and get the cops involved.

Joe - Nonce Mo Watch wrote:

<quoted text>
Mo is using psywar/psyops stuff. Just relax because he will not do a damn thing. Get some decent advice and get the cops involved.

Evidence of how easy an allegation is made and believed. Indeed, this entire discussion thread is evidence the Cal Supremes should reconsider their ex post facto ruling since Wolin is not even a convicted person.

The Alaska Supreme Court did find it punishment Friday.

http://newsminer.com/news/2008/jul/26/alaska-...

Dr. Wolin, you don't make sense. The Cal Supremes didn't rule on anything. They just chose not to hear your case. How is their decision (not ruling) not to hear you case an ex post facto decision? What does it matter to their decision that you are not a convicted felon (yet)? And how is this thread evidence that the Cal Supremes should reconsider their decision (not ruling) not to hear your case? Please elaborate and clarify. If you don't your above posting only adds up to incoherent babble. Thank you, Dr. Wolin.

Wolin,

Unless it would be violating some court order, or even your attorneys' directives, drop the pretense. Sign up as Tall Dreamy Doc and quit using the proxies.

Miggy, the Thief

Brittle Fingers wrote:

I've never believed that Wolin himself has posted on this thread.....I've joked about 'Bob' being Wolin, but I've never actually believed it. But just in case Wolin is here checking and posting on this thread, I will speak directly to him here:
Mr. Wolin, if I were you I'd be scared sh1tless. I've been on the wrong side of the law before, and even though my offense was very different and less serious, I can sorta identify with you. I say this because when you were in the police trailer and said, "I've never done anything before in my life", I could identify with your mindset. I felt the same way.....I hadn't done anything before -- not even a speeding ticket -- so why couldn't they just let me go? I didn't belong in handcuffs. I wasn't a criminal like the others.
Those are the thoughts I repeated to myself over and over for a couple of days after my arrest. I even thought about fighting the charge, but reality set in and I knew there was no chance of beating it. Besides, if you plead not guilty and are convicted, the penalty would be much, much worse.
Eventually, I reached the stage of acceptance. I realized there was no true way out of it -- I just had to go through it. I really think this is what you should have done. In fact, you can still do it.
Your case is very interesting though because you are now the face of PJ's and TCAP's opposition. The rest of the TCAP stingees are watching and hoping that you're successful. On the other side, there is an online watchdog group that is essentially undefeated.
For your own sake, I hope this experience somehow makes you a better person. I know mine did for me. I also wish the best for your family.
But if you do get convicted.....to quote Peter's neighbor from Office Space, "Watch your cornhole, dude".

So whad ya rat ta get out of getting cornholed and decided you like it. Ratting that is. Probly the cornholing too.

Come on back to daddy for a weekend of traffic ticket time and well have some fun.