Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

7

7

7

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
You do know that citizens can not vote laws that violated existing laws into being?
And that marriage equality is law in many civilized countries?
LOL, you probably can't find Dubai on a world map either...
In other words YOU don't know a flucking thing about any number of issues and are basing your comment on crap you read on some nutty conservative website.
In the future you can avoid sounding an ignorant hillbilly spewing propaganda by educating yourself. Please do so before posting again. THANKS so much!

Judged:

5

5

5

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
First of all, you moron, no one has ever been charged with pedophilia, because that's a clinical condition, not a statutory law.
The violation of laws pedophiles are charge with are child sexual abuse or molestation, child exploitation, child pornography, incest, kidnapping, statutory rape, or the prostitution of minors -- the very crimes you stupidly use in your example as charges that are not pedophilia charges.
The bottom line is, when an adult has sex with a person under the age of consent our legal system lists him as a "pedophile."
It doesn't matter if he's 18 and his girlfriend a day shy of 18, if he's convicted of having sex with her, he goes down in the books as a pedophile.
You may be familiar with the program "To Catch a Predator." All of the dudes roped-in were branded pedophiles, sent to jail, and assigned the same restrictions all clinical pedophiles are -- no access to children, reporting to local authorities when moving into their neighborhoods, pedophile therapy, restricted access to their own children or grandchildren, etc.
Our legal system does not make the distinction you moronically posit above.

Judged:

7

7

7

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

The thing that is NOT RIGHT is your endless bumper sticker slogans. BTW do you get daily e-mails to help you with your "talking points" or do your seek them out from those websites for like minded idiots? Either way have you ever considered "fact checking" before you post BS propaganda that makes you like rather silly?
[]

Judged:

8

7

6

Joe Fortuna wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually that was written by professionals in the field of pedophilia.
I've seen you make a lot of claims, most backed up by nothing but your obsessed opinions. So why don't yopu provide something that will back up your claim that pedophilia is a only a legal term and that homosexuality is only a scientific term.
Because male on male is a homosexual act, doesn't mean having sex with a child is a homosexual act, that is a pedophilia act.
Like my article says, comparing the two is usually done by someone who doesn't know what he is talking about.
Homosexual do molest children, just like heterosexuals, but those that do, are called pedophilies.
You don't have to pause, I'll be around to lap you again anyway.
Biological phenomena, and replicable, and discrete, what a crook. Baffle them with BS doesn't work.

Homosexual do molest children, just like heterosexuals, but those that do, are called pedophilies.

Judged:

7

7

7

BlowHole marv wrote:

Hans Feldmeier, an 87-year-old man from Germany, has kept for the past 64 years.
In 1948 when the U.S. was in the middle of an aid program to help rebuild Germany after World War II. Feldmeier decided to save the lard tin for emergencies.
He took it to food safety experts in Germany, who ultimately deemed the 64-year-old can edible for human consumption. The food safety team did not return the lard to Feldmeier. They did return the red, white, and blue can.
Would you taste the contents of a 64-year-old can of lard?

Judged:

5

5

5

Conservative Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't miss it. My firm blocks that kind of webpage, including youtube and I only saw the website now.
"Obviously, gays see nothing wrong with promoting "Rent-A-Boy" on a non-profit youth agency site."
I'm not one to speculate, so as far as your statement above, I say it behooves you not to jump to conclusions which you can't back up.
You're not privy of the contractual reasons, if any, of why such link is on a ccaa website. And speculating about it only makes you look more prejudicial in your own mythical beliefs.
For all you and I know, there could be an advertising contract involved for that link to be placed in the ccaa.org website.
Bottom line, my answer to your question is I don't know. And to expand on it, neither do you.

Judged:

5

4

4

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
Listen to yourself, you are no less predjudice than I. I do beleive you and your gay community are affraid that this issue would never come to a vote by the people knowing it would never pass. So you enjoy your gay marriage while you can, it can soon be disolved as well.

Judged:

5

5

5

Phelanite wrote:

<quoted text>
I did overgeneralize. Well said.

Judged:

5

5

5

Conservative Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell me something I don't know. Problem is that you Xtians are always hiding behind the same dogma and when cornered, always resort to the proverbial "Christians aren't perfect, just forgiven."
Well woopty F___ng Doo. I suppose it's a great thing for us Jews that we only have to atone our sins once a year, and you Xtians have to do it a whole lot more often.
Guess we know who "sins" more.

Judged:

4

4

4

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>What do you want Christians to do? get out their swords? What I don't understand about Jews in this country is why they support a man that seems to not support Israel but instead makes sure the muslim brotherhood takes over the middle east.

Judged:

4

4

4

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, I see -- it boils down to how two judges interpret the law: if they decide Prop 8 is Unconstitutional, the people who support Prop 8 are stupid.
What happens when SCOTUS decides 5-2 in favor of Prop 8?
Who will you be calling "stupid" then, Sue -- the LGBT community, the two judges, or the gay hair-stylists you work with in that beauty salon in the Bronx?

Judged:

4

4

4

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>What do you want Christians to do? get out their swords? What I don't understand about Jews in this country is why they support a man that seems to not support Israel but instead makes sure the muslim brotherhood takes over the middle east.

Judged:

4

4

4

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>You gays are really the pid in stupid. The 2 liptard judges simply made up law and ruled that the people of California took away a right to marry, given illegally by the CSSC. He truth, which eludes gays is this, the CSSC was required to give the people of California 90 days to get the signatures to put the initiative on the ballot, and stay until they failed to get the signatures and if so, then the ballot vote would have decided the issue and therefore no marriage denial.

Judged:

4

4

4

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>You, a Jew, who only atones for one sin a year, go 364 days filled with sin. It explains how backed up you must be, you know, full of poop.

Judged:

4

4

4

Hey Rittardo wrote:

<quoted text>
Seriously? You think American Jews care more about Isreal than issue in there home country? How many American Jews do you think actually have a connection to Israel? You do understand that modern Israel is a damn young nation? Sure, it has connections back to much older historic nation, but unless you've made a pilgrimage, most American Jews identify more with Europe than Israel.
You live in a weird world...

Judged:

2

2

2

HeyReturd wrote:

<quoted text>That's why I'm asking, I wonder why they seem to care more about the destruction of Israel. How many have a connection? LOL...are u serious? lol...

Judged:

1

1

1

windsome wisdom of ELH wrote:

<quoted text>Now, that sounds so gay and so sick.

Judged:

1

1

1

Sue Wee wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a clueless goy.