Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 51,252

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34403 Jul 4, 2012
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
And again, you rely on pejorative terminology, personal insults, and irrational prejudice to support your desire to harm gay couples and their families.
As previously demonstrated on this thread, gay people have always existed and have been accepted by many religious groups and cultures throughout history. That has even included blessing their unions. Your demeaning characterization of the acceptance of gay people as "crass uncivilized trampling of social customs" and false claim recognition "would desecrate every single significant religion and culture in existence" is simply false as well as insulting to those religious groups who support marriage equality.
Your stigmatizing, dehumanizing pejorative terminology fails to provide any legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of equal rights as required by the constitution.
You once again exhibit deep denial. The facts and history simply don't support your wishful thinking. The very fact that legal manipulation with distorted and dishonest information has been the sole tool of recent imposition of gay unions validates your denial and distortion.

I can't help it if the naked truth is 'stigmatizing, dehumanizing pejorative terminology'. Stop whining about it like girl.
Atheist

Mokena, IL

#34404 Jul 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me?
A 'intact' family is a mother, father and biological children.
A gay union can NEVER identify with a 'intact' family.
That really is disgusting gay twirl. It insults anyone who cares that every child deserves a mother and father or the very best substitute of that setting. Even more disturbing, it abuses the child to NOT pursue that.
<quoted text>
Clearly and blatantly dishonest.
You did not say a intact couple, you said 'a intact family'.
A gay couple can NEVER equate to a intact family. That is a undeniable fact.
A child in such a gay union is always the result of a broken circumstance. Always slighted a parent and a gender. Those can be nothing but inherent disadvantages.
Considering you don't know the word "an", I'm going to say that everything you have said is irrelevant.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#34405 Jul 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
all of your little diatribe is based upon one thing... your opinion. there's not one fact mentioned.

you assume tha tsame sex parents can't be the equal of opposite sex parents... you assume that they are somehow lacking. you assume that a same sex union is somehow bad for the children... but you never once mention the many same sex combined families due to second, third or forth marriages.

this is all based upon your opinion and nothing more.
Plays with peter

Olney, IL

#34406 Jul 4, 2012
Two lesbians and two gay guys are taking a trip, who gets to the airport faster?

The lesbians. While the lesbians go Lickity split, the gay men are still home packin their sh!t!
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#34407 Jul 4, 2012
S.F. Gay Rights Leader Arrested Over Child Porn

S.F. CRIME:

Published 09:21 p.m., Monday, June 25, 2012:

San Francisco police have arrested veteran gay rights advocate Larry Brinkin in connection with felony possession of child pornography.

Brinkin, 66, who worked for the San Francisco Human Rights Commission before his retirement in 2010, was taken into custody Friday night. He spent the night in jail before he was released on bail, according to a spokeswoman for the sheriff's department.

The district attorney's office will decide Tuesday whether to file charges. "We're still reviewing the case," district attorney's spokeswoman Stephanie Ong Stillman said Monday.

Police say that Brinkin had pornographic images, some that appear to show children as young as 1 and 2 or 3 years old being sodomized and performing oral sex on adult men, in e-mail attachments linked to his account, according to a search warrant served by San Francisco police.

Representatives of America Online contacted authorities after coming across e-mail attachments from one of its subscriber's accounts containing what they believed to be child pornography.

The Los Angeles Police Department, which was assigned to the case, traced the IP address associated with the account, Zack3737@aol.com, to Brinkin, a San Francisco resident, according to court records. Los Angeles police forwarded the case to San Francisco police.

San Francisco investigators say the account was registered to Brinkin, and that he paid for the e-mail service with his credit card.
Police provided two examples of e-mail messages from last year in which Zack3737 provides disturbing descriptions of the exploitive sexual acts.

The e-mail account also is linked to Yahoo discussion groups on sexual exploitation of young boys and girls, according to the search warrant.
Executing a search warrant Friday, police seized two laptops, a desk top computer, videos, a floppy disk and thumb drives from Brinkin's Waller Street home.

During his 22-year tenure at the Human Rights Commission, Brinkin was best known for championing equal rights for gays and lesbians. He helped craft San Francisco's groundbreaking Equal Benefits Ordinance, which became a national model for workplace equality.

Upon Brinkin's retirement, the Board of Supervisors approved a resolution declaring the week of Feb. 1, 2010, "Larry Brinkin Week" in San Francisco, saying his "dedication to advance the civil rights of all people has never stopped."

Former Supervisor Bevan Dufty who authored the board resolution, said Monday that he was shocked to learn of Brinkin's arrest. "I have admired and respected his work for the LGBT community," Dufty said. "I respect and am confident that there will be due process."
kelsey

Sugar Grove, IL

#34408 Jul 4, 2012
Saluki Rod who started this joke of a thread is just one more gay bag of crap attempting to stuff his sick lifestyle down Americas throat or up their ass.

This is not normal, and of course Saluki Rd is no where to be found.

Where are you , you degenerate pos?

Probably back in his gay cave.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34410 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me?
A 'intact' family is a mother, father and biological children.
A gay union can NEVER identify with a 'intact' family.
That really is disgusting gay twirl. It insults anyone who cares that every child deserves a mother and father or the very best substitute of that setting. Even more disturbing, it abuses the child to NOT pursue that.
<quoted text>
Clearly and blatantly dishonest.
You did not say a intact couple, you said 'a intact family'.
A gay couple can NEVER equate to a intact family. That is a undeniable fact.
A child in such a gay union is always the result of a broken circumstance. Always slighted a parent and a gender. Those can be nothing but inherent disadvantages.
Atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering you don't know the word "an", I'm going to say that everything you have said is irrelevant.
If you are a bigot, it doesn't take much to be illogical.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34411 Jul 5, 2012
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
all of your little diatribe is based upon one thing... your opinion. there's not one fact mentioned.
you assume tha tsame sex parents can't be the equal of opposite sex parents... you assume that they are somehow lacking. you assume that a same sex union is somehow bad for the children... but you never once mention the many same sex combined families due to second, third or forth marriages.
this is all based upon your opinion and nothing more.
Avoiding a direct answer that would confirm your deceit.

Instead, digging in with stubborn stupidity. So foolish.

As to not mentioning straight, foster/step/adoptive families, untrue. My very assertion is that gay unions can never be more than one of those with the additional negative of missing one gender in parents.

You need to look up the difference between facts and opinions.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34412 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
all of your little diatribe is based upon one thing... your opinion. there's not one fact mentioned.
you assume tha tsame sex parents can't be the equal of opposite sex parents... you assume that they are somehow lacking. you assume that a same sex union is somehow bad for the children... but you never once mention the many same sex combined families due to second, third or forth marriages.
this is all based upon your opinion and nothing more.
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.

By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#34413 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.
By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.
must suck being a lonely bigot on the 4th...lol

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34414 Jul 5, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:
<quoted text>must suck being a lonely bigot on the 4th...lol
I'm never alone.

You?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#34416 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.
By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.
one fact... human breeding has come to the point that it's no longer feasible. why the hell are you so hung up on it, anyway? do you really believe that every union should or must produce progeny?

another fact is that two women can and are breeding together and it's only a matter of time before medical science makes it possible for men, also. do you have a problem with that, too?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#34417 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm never alone.
You?
bullshit... your hand doesn't count.
Staggers with Drunks

Saint Louis, MO

#34418 Jul 5, 2012
That was below the belt.
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
bullshit... your hand doesn't count.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#34419 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm never alone.
You?
sure!!!!! You like alot of these homophobe bigots were on here all day yesterday... which was the 4th of july... I checked a couple times when I would come home to change outfits or clean up... I had 11 tricks yesterday... three dinners and two fireworks displays and finished off the night closing down two clubs..... while you lonely azz losers spread your hate of gays.... ya right you weren't alone... no family or spouse would hang with you morons

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34420 Jul 5, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:
<quoted text>sure!!!!! You like alot of these homophobe bigots were on here all day yesterday... which was the 4th of july... I checked a couple times when I would come home to change outfits or clean up... I had 11 tricks yesterday... three dinners and two fireworks displays and finished off the night closing down two clubs..... while you lonely azz losers spread your hate of gays.... ya right you weren't alone... no family or spouse would hang with you morons
My wife and I spent the morning together (at which time I was on here off and on), then went to her sister's and had a early dinner with them.

We had invited anyone in the neighborhood to come at nine for fireworks. My brother-in-law and I set off over $700 in fireworks, our wives and some friends had popcorn, watermelon, brownies and such for the kids and everyone.

We live in different worlds, huh? The sadder fact is we will likely live in a different eternity. It's not too late.
kelsey

Sugar Grove, IL

#34421 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife and I spent the morning together (at which time I was on here off and on), then went to her sister's and had a early dinner with them.
We had invited anyone in the neighborhood to come at nine for fireworks. My brother-in-law and I set off over $700 in fireworks, our wives and some friends had popcorn, watermelon, brownies and such for the kids and everyone.
We live in different worlds, huh? The sadder fact is we will likely live in a different eternity. It's not too late.
These people are hard core,I hope you like beating your head against a brick wall.
These are some fierce haters of "normal" American life.
They will not stop their propaganda to push their lifestyle as normal and acceptable.

Good luck.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34422 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
I assert that you have given one of your most stupendously idiotic opinions yet!
I hope you have a really fat a//, because I feel bad kicking it so often.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Come on feebles, I listed just one. Explain to us how that is opinion and not fact. It really is a simple question, I didn't want to make it too complicated for you.
By the way, still waiting for your one example of self incest by stem cell impregnation deliberately birthing a child without one parent.
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
one fact... human breeding has come to the point that it's no longer feasible. why the hell are you so hung up on it, anyway? do you really believe that every union should or must produce progeny?
another fact is that two women can and are breeding together and it's only a matter of time before medical science makes it possible for men, also. do you have a problem with that, too?
http://www.explorestemcells.co.uk/stem-cells-...

The techniques purported to allow same-sex reproduction have yet to be successful but they do hold promise. They include methods of cellular reprogramming and even techniques such as artificial chromosomes. While they have not been shown to work at present, they do hold potential for the future of same-sex reproduction. One particular technique involves the creation of sperm from human stem cells. In a recent experiment, bone marrow stem cells were extracted from men and they were then triggered into spermatogonia. These cells are able to develop into immature sperm cells. The experiment was widely reported in the news but has not yet been published or successfully replicated.

This article is dated June 1, 2012. You said your grandson was a successful stem cell self incest product of your daughter. Care to explain?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34424 Jul 5, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take one example of your assertion and test it (You can pick one and do it if you think I have been unfair);
"If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent"
Your assertion is that this is "a poorly thought out opinion"?
-You are asserting that a gay union provides a child with more than one gender?
-You are asserting that a gay union can provide a child with more than one natural parent?
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>

...nothing...
Still waiting for a specific response.

Having trouble weebles?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#34425 Jul 5, 2012
kelsey wrote:
<quoted text>
These people are hard core,I hope you like beating your head against a brick wall.
These are some fierce haters of "normal" American life.
They will not stop their propaganda to push their lifestyle as normal and acceptable.
Good luck.
I seem to have a calling to kick at the darkness until it bleeds light.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Edwardsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Kirk Kinnear aka elmo aka lying theif 21 hr scrub hater 1
skyler williams the god the bad and the UGLY.. 22 hr momma Shawna 2
who is the hottest chick in collinsville right ... (Sep '11) Dec 18 velvetmorning 32
who remembers? (Dec '08) Dec 10 bob balie 121
South Roxana Man Charged With Sexual Assault (Jan '14) Dec 10 Justyce 4
name of old restaurant that White Castle occupi... Dec 9 highland 1
help john deere modle g styled with front loade... Dec 6 john deere g 1
Edwardsville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Edwardsville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Edwardsville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Edwardsville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:02 am PST

Bleacher Report 6:02AM
The Coach That Could Turn Around Bears
Bleacher Report11:28 AM
Jay Cutler Rumors: Latest Details, Speculation on Bears QB's Future
NBC Sports12:33 PM
1 thing even Rahm can't fix: Da Bears - NBC Sports
ESPN 7:36 AM
Sources: Goodell says no L.A. team in 2015
NBC Sports 8:26 AM
Report: Executives suggest Bears could have to attach a draft pick to move Cutler