Michael Jackson

Neutral comment (almost).
Sadly we owe the way we react to the way we were brought up. Luckily, some of us are intelligent enough to have minds of our own and not believe all the crap that the money grabbing tabloids publish just to keep themselves in employment. Never judge a person by what you read or heard, you can only make up your mind about someone after you've met and spoken to them (assuming you have a mind in the first place). Otherwise don't slander the innocent without actual proof!

Sensibility wrote:

Neutral comment (almost).
Sadly we owe the way we react to the way we were brought up. Luckily, some of us are intelligent enough to have minds of our own and not believe all the crap that the money grabbing tabloids publish just to keep themselves in employment. Never judge a person by what you read or heard, you can only make up your mind about someone after you've met and spoken to them (assuming you have a mind in the first place). Otherwise don't slander the innocent without actual proof!

And never judge a person by propaganda for a star from a fanpage.

BTW You were neutral like Al-Quaida about Christians,USA,JEWS would be..full of propaganda.

MJ is not the victim!!!

*from

Hunja wrote:

<quoted text>
And never judge a person by propaganda for a star from a fanpage.
BTW You were neutral like Al-Quaida about Christians,USA,JEWS would be..full of propaganda.
MJ is not the victim!!!

And you are judgemental like a mindless idiot - do you get the point? Why don't you realise that you have a mind of your own instead of believing what you hear or read? In a court of law hearsay is not accepted as evidence so why accept it yourself?
I can only assume that the way you think is the way you act - what does that say about you?

Sensibility wrote:

<quoted text>
In a court of law hearsay is not accepted as evidence so why accept it yourself?
?

This is a court of law? In that case, I should have worn a tie.

An NFL Fan wrote:

<quoted text>
This is a court of law? In that case, I should have worn a tie.

Obviously you're only capable of reading the parts that catch your attention - hence, the reason why you're so ignorant. None of you are even worth my time!

Sensibility wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously you're only capable of reading the parts that catch your attention - hence, the reason why you're so ignorant. None of you are even worth my time!

Thanks Perry F Mason. Have fun in the courtroom!

Sensibility wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously you're only capable of reading the parts that catch your attention - hence, the reason why you're so ignorant. None of you are even worth my time!

'K bye!

Sensibility wrote:

Neutral comment (almost).
Never judge a person by what you read

Good advice, that! I'll try really hard from now on, just like you do.

Sensibility wrote:

<quoted text>
And you are judgemental like a mindless idiot

Doh!

Sensibility wrote:

<quoted text>
None of you are even worth my time!

Let me show you to the door.

Sensibility wrote:

Neutral comment (almost).
Sadly we owe the way we react to the way we were brought up. Luckily, some of us are intelligent enough to have minds of our own and not believe all the crap that the money grabbing tabloids publish just to keep themselves in employment. Never judge a person by what you read or heard, you can only make up your mind about someone after you've met and spoken to them (assuming you have a mind in the first place). Otherwise don't slander the innocent without actual proof!

Actually, some of us have been brought up to read legal documents and are intelligent enough to see the truth in the black-and-white print. Why waste time with tabloids when the legal docs provide so much undisputable information?