Did you vote today?

BARNEYII wrote:

This Chik-fil-a uproar was a brilliant marketing ploy. Just look at all the free publicity this has got Chik-fil-a. People on here (TOPIX) saying they never been there before, and they are going now.
He new damn well, that comment would bring on a protest.That the homophobic mullets would go spend their money (today is proof of that) in his stores in a sign of solidarity. So you folks pack his store in support of him, and he takes your money and laughs all the way to the bank.
As the old saying goes, "there is a fool born every minute".

You've made it quite obvious your disdain for freedom of speech especially for those who disagree with you, but how does supporting free speech make one "homophobic?"

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO ,do you think he would have said those things if it was going to hurt his business. Only thing a ultra wealthy christian business man loves more than God is the dollar.

Once again, you have no idea what you are talking about and you broadcast it with every post. Do you know every ultra wealthy Christian business man? You would have to in order to make that claim. Right? God doesn't see profit as a bad thing although the left will tell you different. The parable of the talents shows this in Matthew 25:14-30. You should read it.

SAC Warrior wrote:

<quoted text>
France was never a true world power. Sounds like someone needs a history lesson.

My point exactly. No history lesson needed.

guest wrote:

<quoted text>You've made it quite obvious your disdain for freedom of speech especially for those who disagree with you, but how does supporting free speech make one "homophobic?"

You have a serious comprehension problem.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again, you have no idea what you are talking about and you broadcast it with every post. Do you know every ultra wealthy Christian business man? You would have to in order to make that claim. Right? God doesn't see profit as a bad thing although the left will tell you different. The parable of the talents shows this in Matthew 25:14-30. You should read it.

Well tell me then, the ultra rich have more money than they could ever spend, if they don't love money more than God, why don't, they just give their excess wealth to the church.

How does eating a chicken sandwich reinforce the sanctity of marriage?

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again, you have no idea what you are talking about and you broadcast it with every post. Do you know every ultra wealthy Christian business man? You would have to in order to make that claim. Right? God doesn't see profit as a bad thing although the left will tell you different. The parable of the talents shows this in Matthew 25:14-30. You should read it.

Do you know every individual that prefers the left.

Do you think It's okay for you constantly stereotype any one with a preference for the left, and cry foul when others do the same to the right.


Just to let you know I will be gone for a couple of hours.

I was just told by a wise Christian Republican that us Liberals do not believe in profit.

I have to go to return the profit to the sale barn that I made off that load of cattle last week.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
My point exactly. No history lesson needed.

France was one of the first superpowers after Rome. They fell after they spread their military too thin fighting foriegn wars. But u already knew that right?

The head of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress (CAP) is defending controversial State Department official Huma Abedin, a top aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who is suspected of playing a role in Obama Administration “engagement” with the anti-American Muslim Brotherhood.
Neera Tanden, president and CEO of CAP and Counselor for CAP’s Action Fund, has sent out an email defending Abedin and asking that Rep. Michele Bachmann be thrown off the House Intelligence Committee for asking questions about the vetting process that Abedin was supposed to go through.
Tanden is a former Obama Administration official whose previous claim to fame was working for the Obama White House to pass Obamacare. Her work at CAP apparently includes supporting the Obama Administration’s policy to “engage” with the Muslim Brotherhood. It is believed Abedin is right in the middle of that, by virtue of her position as State Department deputy chief of staff.
CAP is the organization that hired Van Jones before he took his job as White House “Green Jobs Czar” and then re-hired him after his communist background came to light and he lost his job in the administration.
Tanden said in her email to CAP supporters that the problem was not Abedin’s access to classified information but Bachmann’s. She urged House Speaker John Boehner to remove Bachmann from the Intelligence Committee.“Rep. Bachmann’s antics have proven that she can’t be trusted to act in our best interests,” said Tanden.
Boehner, as well as Senator John McCain, had criticized Bachmann for merely asking questions about Abedin’s fitness for her position. But they didn’t indicate familiarity with or knowledge of Abedin’s security clearance form, known as Standard Form 86, or the “Questionnaire for National Security Positions.”
Despite the claims of “witch hunt” and “McCarthyism” that are echoed in the liberal media, especially by Anderson Cooper of CNN, Bachmann and other members of Congress simply want to know whether Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood connections were disclosed and/or examined when she gained access to national security information.
Their letter to the Inspector General of the State Department points out that Abedin “has three family members—her late father, her mother and her brother—connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations,” and that “Her position affords her routine access to the Secretary and to policy-making.”
The matter can be resolved, if the media are truly interested in getting to the bottom of the controversy, by demanding access to Abedin’s Standard Form 86, which she was supposed to fill out before getting her State Department job. House Speaker Boehner could also demand a copy.
Did she disclose her family connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as to Saudi Arabia, where she once lived and was raised?
“It is required that job candidates complete the questionnaire and other required forms thoroughly, honestly, and with candor,” the State Department says.
For its part, the White House says it is committed to transparency and open government. Releasing Abedin’s form is a test case and a way to start resolving the controversy.
The questionnaire for national security positions is a 127-page document which asks for such information as relatives and associates, foreign activities, foreign countries visited, the use of illegal drugs, and involvement in groups dedicated to terrorism or the overthrow of the U.S. government. It is not surprising that CAP would spring to the defense of Abedin. Matt Duss, a policy analyst at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, wrote an article,“Talking to the Muslim Brotherhood (finally),” in which he defended the administration “reaching out to parties and Islamic movements” but at the same time raised concern about “the group’s most prominent affiliated cleric, Yusuf al-Qaradawi,[who] regularly issues the grossest anti-American and anti-Semitic slanders on his Al- Jazeera show.”

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Well tell me then, the ultra rich have more money than they could ever spend, if they don't love money more than God, why don't, they just give their excess wealth to the church.

Funny you should say that. Romney, whether or not you consider him a Christian, does give millions to the Mormon church. I am confident that all true successful Christian business men/women do tithe and give sacrificially as well. God doesn't require that Christians tithe believe it or not. He does, however, bless those who give tithes and sacrificial gifts joyfully and not begrudgingly because "God said so".

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Well tell me then, the ultra rich have more money than they could ever spend, if they don't love money more than God, why don't, they just give their excess wealth to the church.

You just summed up the greed of the left in one short post. The left is so obsessed with other peoples money and taking it from them for their own power.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
You have a serious comprehension problem.

You have serious problem dealing with facts.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know every individual that prefers the left.
Do you think It's okay for you constantly stereotype any one with a preference for the left, and cry foul when others do the same to the right.

Once again, your hypocrisy shows it's intolerant head. You just stereotyped the people who ate at Chick-fil-a yesterday to support someone whose is being discriminated against and having their first ammendment rights attacked with lies by left-wing politicians as "homophobic mullets."
Once again, it's ok for you to generalize and stereotype and call people names.

luvin every minute of it wrote:

How does eating a chicken sandwich reinforce the sanctity of marriage?

It doesn't. Nor does it make you a "homophobic mullet." Once again, the left is using a false narrative to smear people who don't do exactly what they want them to do.

guest wrote:

<quoted text>Once again, your hypocrisy shows it's intolerant head. You just stereotyped the people who ate at Chick-fil-a yesterday to support someone whose is being discriminated against and having their first ammendment rights attacked with lies by left-wing politicians as "homophobic mullets."
Once again, it's ok for you to generalize and stereotype and call people names.

If the shoe fits, wear it proudly.

guest wrote:

<quoted text>It doesn't. Nor does it make you a "homophobic mullet." Once again, the left is using a false narrative to smear people who don't do exactly what they want them to do.

All bow, St. Guest of Mississippi County has spoken.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
My point exactly. No history lesson needed.

Of course not, if it was required most of you couldn't support your right-wing argument.

guest wrote:

<quoted text>It doesn't. Nor does it make you a "homophobic mullet." Once again, the left is using a false narrative to smear people who don't do exactly what they want them to do.

One could just as easily apply your last sentence to the right wing as well. The left has not cornered the market on crazy, hypocritical word vomit. Just look at that super long post above. It is also misinformed word vomit; and it is from the right.

luvin every minute of it wrote:

<quoted text> One could just as easily apply your last sentence to the right wing as well. The left has not cornered the market on crazy, hypocritical word vomit. Just look at that super long post above. It is also misinformed word vomit; and it is from the right.

You must not be familiar with DailyKos or mediamatters.com . If you are an objective person, those two sites alone would make you rethink your obviously nonobjective position.

Left wing, right wing, to hell with both - I prefer chicken wings.

It is amazing how pushed out of shape people become over diatribe. Do you people realize that adding fuel to fire makes it burn more.

Very onion skinny.