Barack Obama, our next President

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
To really get to the bottom of it I guess he's going to have to ask his predecessor since the ATF gun-running program began in 2006 under the last administration.

Didn't I just say it, folks?
Speak of the Devil.....another Bush-Bashing fool shows up...

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Lot's of good stuff over there.
Christian Jihad
Laying Down the Sword: Why We Can’t Ignore the Bible’s Violent Verses
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articl...
I'd call it an anti-BS site.

I know you're a smart man. You can't possibly think theamericanconservative is...conservative,

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Confused?
Is A Sensible And Imaginative Conservatism Still Possible?
Yes.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/masthe...
Now why in the world would you think that's 'confused'?
You're not a FOXbot, so what's the story skippy?

Their philosophy is -
The American Conservative magazine, which since 2002 has argued vigorously against American interventionism, against a debt-based fiscal policy used to finance adventurism abroad and government growth at home, and against the intrusions on Americans’ private lives by an exploding state security apparatus.

Find me one article that supports this philosophy. Instead you have a mixed jumble of opinions from a variety of backgrounds none in journalism or Political Science. The editor is a physicist. The author you love is an Orthodox minister. Many of the articles are poorly written and having a concise viewpoint maintained within in an article appears to be optional.

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
I know you're a smart man. You can't possibly think theamericanconservative is...conservative,

LOL. Apparently he does.

Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
Racist sh*tholes like you give Repubs a bad name.

*You All* Repos deserve it, and then some.

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Why is the word "confused" in nearly all of Carol's posts? Sure seems to be a lot of "confusion" about and she seems to be the nexus.
What could that possibly mean?

It means that you make no sense in your clueless rants.

This confuses her - someone rational looking for sense between your lines of stupidity.

Why is this so confusing to you?

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
Kuwait belonged to Iraq originally; Bush Sr. gave the ok to invade. You're a fool

there is some evidence of the above.
Kuwait is a member of the UN and needed to be protected from invasion.
US was attacked under Republican George Bush on 9/11

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
I've often wondered the same thing

tell me she ain't drunk, tenzing.

Genie wrote:

<quoted text> What you should be afraid of, is a repeat of 4 more years of Obama failure.

why are you afraid? I thought you all repos thought you were so bad and though, bring it p*****s!!!!

JEB wrote:

<quoted text>
there is some evidence of the above.
Kuwait is a member of the UN and needed to be protected from invasion.
US was attacked under Republican George Bush on 9/11

agreed.

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do Americans think it's their right to go and preach their form of life to others?
Why is it that you see things as: we're right and the world is wrong? or We're good and they're bad?
Why can't you accept that there are other cultures, religions, customs in other countries and it's been that way for centuries?

So Muslim women are beaten, stoned to death, beheaded, imprisoned for being raped and you - a bleeding heart Liberal fuzzhead - says "So what? That's their culture!"

Now if *you* were one of those unfortunate women, it would be a wholly different story. Right, hypocrite?

get over it wrote:

<quoted text> why are you afraid? I thought you all repos thought you were so bad and though, bring it p*****s!!!!

Pray to Obama that I will not be afraid of your spelling of the word "tough" as "though", and your fear of spelling "p*****s"... along with your decreased mental state, for which the taxpapers will be paying outrageous amounts as the nation fears the harrowing effects of ObamaSCARE. Now "get over it", and fearlessly climb back on your raft to Kenya, as your past 20 years of Obama worship with Rev. Wright will be as easily forgotten as all of Obama's 57 states of hopey-changey, fool.

And so it goes wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a very confused site as their stated philosophy and articles are in direct conflict. Of course this would not trouble you but I find them dishonest if not deceitful.

The American Conservative (TAC) is an anti-war and Old Right voice against the dominance of what it sees as a neoconservative media establishment.

It also has ties with anti-war libertarians, although individual TAC columnists such as Stuart Reid and Robert Locke have been sharply critical of libertarianism.

In 2009 Reihan Salam wrote that the publication had "gained a devoted following as a sharp critic of the conservative mainstream."

+++

So no, TAC is not a traditional "conservative" website like Redstate, Gateway Pundit, or Hot Air.

get over it wrote:

<quoted text> why are you afraid? I thought you all repos thought you were so bad and though, bring it p*****s!!!!

What are you talking about? Repos?

Nia_ wrote:

I'm done for the night...
You people are insane but I'll leave you with this thought.
I wonder how people can vote for Romney, the man who belonged to a church that banned men of african descent from it's priesthood until 1978, well after Romney became a member. A cult like organization where men can have multiple wives...i.e. Brigham Young.
When I can stomach watching Hannity, I see Romney's wife who seems like a nice lady. But why did she marry him? Her family wasn't allowed in the church at their wedding because they weren't Mormon. I mean that's pretty nuts.
Yeh he's a pretty decent looking man and he can spoil her rotten but he seems like a... Well a.....,,,,,NUT..... just like most of the people who posted in this thread.
Anyhoo, good evening to all.

Pretty sure of yourself , what is your church ? WICCA ? baptist ?
My educated guess would be Catholic.. since you are an illegal alien that will be granted citizenship by our traitor president in exchange for you prostituting yourself by giving him your vote.

Many have called the catholic church a cult too, in fact that is true of almost any Church, members of other religions often call ones they dont agree with Cults....

For some one who says Obama is the best man ever and you worship him etc. and you cant wait to get dressed up and go vote for him
you sure dont show any religious tolerance... thats one of the founding principles of our country , religious freedom .......
of course if you would have immigrated to our country in the proper manner you would have learned this!

Instead you Broke into our country in the same manner a thief breaks into a home to steal it blind....
how many government handouts and otgher things have you stolen since you broke into our country illegally ????

you wetback scum crack me up with your double and triple standards

Its Ok for your men to Rape our babies to death, but If I bring it up because I find it Objectionable, then I am the one that is Scum ... come on that's just retarded just like you are

you whored yourself out in exchange for citizenship ! how does it feel? does it feel similar to when you watch your wetback boyfriend
slide his member into one of our children ?

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Just can't resist the trough huh?
The 1920-21 depression was the last big retraction before the Great Depression. The DJIA lost 50% of its value, manufacturing dropped by nearly 40%, estimates of unemployment (in U3 terms before unemployment was officially measured) was 10-11%.
The government did nothing, Harding sat in the White House playing poker. The depression only lasted 18 months. By 1922 we were back to full employment and by ’23 manufacturing was back at peak capacity.
How's Romney planning on "creating" all these jobs he speaks of? A tax cut "stimulus"? How about repealing onerous "regulations"? He states openly that he's talking about Obama's regulatory record however, those regulations weren't in place in 2007 when initial jobless claims began skyrocketing and certainly weren't a factor when unemployment peaked in 2009.
Its arguable that 8% is the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU) for current conditions. Will he try to convince us that 8% is the new 5%?
What sort of excuses can you provide for Carol, she's gonna need 'em.

Haven't you started back breathing yet? It shows in your postings, Dood.

What in-the-hell does an economic event back in 1921 have to do with Mitt Romney today? You failed to make any connection between the two and if you assume that readers will do it for you, try again.

You are clueless and wandering in the desert of stupidity.

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, Obama killed bin Laden? What has he done for vets? Are women being paid the same as men in the Obama administration?
OK, lemme guess, the GOP wants dirty air and dirty water. They want the poor, and the elderly to die in the streets (or be pushed off a cliff) and children to starve, right?

Nia is standing there like a fish with a hook, line and sinker hanging from her lips. All she needs to do next is to swallow.

Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Its always about Vaginas.
Everything else can sort itself out.
I couldn't imagine being a straight, male gynecologist. Might as well just shoot yourself.

Please oblige us.

Genie wrote:

<quoted text> Pray to Obama that I will not be afraid of your spelling of the word "tough" as "though", and your fear of spelling "p*****s"... along with your decreased mental state, for which the taxpapers will be paying outrageous amounts as the nation fears the harrowing effects of ObamaSCARE. Now "get over it", and fearlessly climb back on your raft to Kenya, as your past 20 years of Obama worship with Rev. Wright will be as easily forgotten as all of Obama's 57 states of hopey-changey, fool.

repos numbers are declining like a non-stop downward spiral and a train wreck on a railess road, your desperation speaks for itself.

Gunner wrote:

<quoted text>
The American Conservative (TAC) is an anti-war and Old Right voice against the dominance of what it sees as a neoconservative media establishment.
It also has ties with anti-war libertarians, although individual TAC columnists such as Stuart Reid and Robert Locke have been sharply critical of libertarianism.
In 2009 Reihan Salam wrote that the publication had "gained a devoted following as a sharp critic of the conservative mainstream."
+++
So no, TAC is not a traditional "conservative" website like Redstate, Gateway Pundit, or Hot Air.

I find them a very confused website because as I stated before their stated philosophy and articles do not reflect each other.