Yes, it worked for the Kennedy Administration. The tax cuts, however, were much smaller in relation to the size of the economy. The goal was to stimulate an economy that was a tad slower than what was considered optimal. But the Kennedy tax cuts were not anything on the scale of the so-called "supply-side" tax cuts of the Reagan era.<quoted text>
What do you have against keeing your own money?
It worked for John F. Kennedy. I quote him:
"It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now ... Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus."
And although the Kennedy tax cuts worked to some degree, the 1981 Reagan tax cuts did not. After the massive 1981 Reagan tax cuts, the country plunged into the deepest recession since the Great Depression. It recovered only after Reagan signed TEFRA, otherwise known as the largest tax increase in the history of the United States. Roughly a year after TEFRA took effect, the economy took off, producing some of the highest GDP growth rates ever (although the magnitude of the growth rates was to some extent magnified by the depth of the 1981-83 recession). Similarly, after Bill Clinton signed the 1993 tax increases, the economy took off for a sustained period of rapid growth, culminating in the first budget surpluses in decades.
We are in the fix we are in today because of eight years of keeping too much money in private hands. Those policies are what got us here. No more please.





