YOU CAN ONLY PROP UP A LIE FOR SO LONg

then what are you going to do when hefails? jump on the republican band wagon? you voted for hope and change, so LIVE IT.elections have consequences.If you lost your job, thats great, the people on here told you you would if obama got elected and you wanted change...well YOU GOT CHANGE.no job, no house and no possibility of finding a job.

LOVING THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THE CHANGE....YEP! they got change..NO JOB--NO HOME---NO MONEY---NO CAR----but you WANTYED CHANGE--there ya go-

Robert Scales wrote:

LOVING THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THE CHANGE....YEP! they got change..NO JOB--NO HOME---NO MONEY---NO CAR----but you WANTYED CHANGE--there ya go-

Speak english, fool.

Lewholt wrote:

<quoted text>
Speak english, fool.

I am sorry,I do not speak ebonics

FAT BABY farT wrote:

<quoted text>
I am sorry,I do not speak ebonics

What a fool you are TarBaby. Typical Wingnut Republican. Except you don't vote, do you?

Robert Scales wrote:

then what are you going to do when hefails? jump on the republican band wagon? you voted for hope and change, so LIVE IT.elections have consequences.If you lost your job, thats great, the people on here told you you would if obama got elected and you wanted change...well YOU GOT CHANGE.no job, no house and no possibility of finding a job.

We love the new president. Can't wait to vote for him again. Get used to the "change" fella, its gonna be a long time before the wingnuts are back in power again.

yea, one year from now.. november 2010

Lindy wrote:

yea, one year from now.. november 2010

So you are voting against Obama in 2010? Who's the Republican presidential nominee next year?

Lewholt wrote:

<quoted text>
We love the new president. Can't wait to vote for him again. Get used to the "change" fella, its gonna be a long time before the wingnuts are back in power again.

In 2010, BIG change in congress. It's gonig to happen and you know it.

fight the ignorance wrote:

<quoted text>
So you are voting against Obama in 2010? Who's the Republican presidential nominee next year?

the senate race you idiot.

digdug wrote:

<quoted text>
the senate race you idiot.

Oh, now it makes sense. Which Democratic Senator from Georgia is up for election in 2010?

fight the ignorance wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, now it makes sense. Which Democratic Senator from Georgia is up for election in 2010?

13th district - Scott

Wow, David Scott is now a Senator. Glad to see another great illustration of the general ignorance among conservatives in Douglas County. I believe that is mistake #3 in this post alone.

digdug wrote:

<quoted text>
the senate race you idiot.

So I qualify as the idiot here? This is the same group where Lindy is voting against Obama in 2010, digdug is voting against the Democratic Senator from Georgia and GetDown thinks that David Scott is a Senator.

Do any of you even have a clue about politics or do you just regurgitate what you hear on the radio and Faux News?

It's just hilarious how the liberals keep throwing down the Fox News card. I have never seen such fear. They are soooo sure that they are getting all the facts from the left leaning stations(which happens to be ALL of the other stations). There is ONE conservative station and it drives them crazy. You gotta love that!

Synergy wrote:

It's just hilarious how the liberals keep throwing down the Fox News card. I have never seen such fear. They are soooo sure that they are getting all the facts from the left leaning stations(which happens to be ALL of the other stations). There is ONE conservative station and it drives them crazy. You gotta love that!

Come on Synergy, I point out the general political ignorance of 3 posters on here and all you can respond to is my comment about Faux News. How about jumping in and defending the posts made by Linday, digdug and GetDown. By the way, where do you think these 3 experts get the majority of their political information if not Faux News or talk radio?

fight the ignorance wrote:

<quoted text>
Come on Synergy, I point out the general political ignorance of 3 posters on here and all you can respond to is my comment about Faux News. How about jumping in and defending the posts made by Linday, digdug and GetDown. By the way, where do you think these 3 experts get the majority of their political information if not Faux News or talk radio?

**********FOX NEWS------FAIR AND BALENCED!!!!!!!!o

fight the ignorance wrote:

<quoted text>
Come on Synergy, I point out the general political ignorance of 3 posters on here and all you can respond to is my comment about Faux News. How about jumping in and defending the posts made by Linday, digdug and GetDown. By the way, where do you think these 3 experts get the majority of their political information if not Faux News or talk radio?

Well, fight the ignorance, if you'll notice, I didn't respond to your post specifically, therefore, why should I be expected to defend anyone??? I just find it amusing how the Democrats always throw down the Fox News card or Faux News as those who continue to be unoriginal call it. By calling Fox News faux, that implies that all the reporting that is done on Fox is NOT authentic and the news that is reported on ALL of the other stations, which happen to be VERY left, IS authentic. That is simply hilarious to me. I've stated many times that in the past I've rarely watched Fox, however, I am beginning to watch Fox more and more. It's not that I haven't agreed with Fox. It's just a matter of habit that I've gotten my news from ABC with enough intelligence to know that the news on ABC is culled and left. I watch Fox to hear about the issues that are not reported on the left leaning stations for obvious reasons. Does Fox give a far right slant to their news? Of course! I know that. But Fox is not in the pocket of Washington and the powers that be, therefore, they bring to light topics that otherwise are glossed over or not reported at all.
I realize, as do others on here, that those three posters you referred to didn't make clear what they were referring to in regard to the upcoming 2010 election. BUT, you knew exactly what they meant as did I. You were simply "picking" because they don't share your political views. That's all. Plain and simple. You know it. I know it. And so does everyone else who have read the posts. You and I are polar opposites in regard to politics, however, I enjoy reading your posts.

Well Mr. Ignorant, if you have been around here any time at all you would have already known it is the 13th district that we are excited about in 2010 for change. And, on the whole a shift in the balance in the House of Reps.

I naturally assumed you mistyped when you typed ""Senate"" instead of House of Reps in the response to the message you did. Everyone here knows there isn’t an incumbent Democrat running for the Senate in 2010. A fact that seems to have flew way above your head considering your question. Do you really think there is a democrat incumbent?

I let it go when I saw your mistake. But you however, decided to jump on what is obviously (now at least) a question designed as a setup instead of actual fact gathering. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, as I don’t think you could be that dumb! Could you?

The only senate seat that will be available in Georgia is the one being held by Johnny Isakson. As far as I know, at this time, there has not been a democrat to declare yet. Maybe you have more information about this race since you have so much interest in it.

Nice try Mr. Ignorant.

fight the ignorance wrote:

Oh, now it makes sense. Which Democratic Senator from Georgia is up for election in 2010?
...
AND
...
Wow, David Scott is now a Senator. Glad to see another great illustration of the general ignorance among conservatives in Douglas County. I believe that is mistake #3 in this post alone.

GetDown wrote:

Well Mr. Ignorant, if you have been around here any time at all you would have already known it is the 13th district that we are excited about in 2010 for change. And, on the whole a shift in the balance in the House of Reps.
I naturally assumed you mistyped when you typed ""Senate"" instead of House of Reps in the response to the message you did. Everyone here knows there isn’t an incumbent Democrat running for the Senate in 2010. A fact that seems to have flew way above your head considering your question. Do you really think there is a democrat incumbent?
I let it go when I saw your mistake. But you however, decided to jump on what is obviously (now at least) a question designed as a setup instead of actual fact gathering. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, as I don’t think you could be that dumb! Could you?
The only senate seat that will be available in Georgia is the one being held by Johnny Isakson. As far as I know, at this time, there has not been a democrat to declare yet. Maybe you have more information about this race since you have so much interest in it.
Nice try Mr. Ignorant.
<quoted text>

who died and left your dumass in charge of the room spelling police?