Buster expected to enter guilty plea Tuesday

Mark Puckett is being wrongly accused in the Buster case and has been misidentifed.To the accuser, I hope you sleep well tonight knowing your sending an innocent man to jail with a scarlet letter for something his whole family and friends knows he wouldn't possibly do.

John Svoboda wrote:

Mark Puckett is being wrongly accused in the Buster case and has been misidentifed.To the accuser, I hope you sleep well tonight knowing your sending an innocent man to jail with a scarlet letter for something his whole family and friends knows he wouldn't possibly do.

And let me guess this innocent man never did drugs, drank or hung out with the Busters either. People sometimes do things when they are being influenced not only by drugs or alcohol, but also by the company they keep. No family wants to believe that a loved one would do something like this, but why would a child, just randomly pick him??? It doesn't make sense.

Mark Puckett only stayed with the Buster's for 2 months because he had no place to go at the time.It was there or on the street.His wife Jessica called cps on the Busters more than once for the way they treated their own kids.Also the accuser has changed their story 3 times.People may do stupid things when on drugs or alchol but,child molestation, come on.Mark is stronger minded than that.He has four kids of his own that love and miss him very very much.Mark also has no previous criminal record at all.The mother of this girl could have easily known Mark.Like I said, Mark was only there for a couple months until he found another place to live and his wife was with him the whole time.Honestly,how can a very young child remember the full name of a man at least 15 years later that she had baredly ever seen as a toddler.

I believe in the death penalty for pedifiles.Mark is not guilty.Everybody, even in Louisville, knows about the Munfordville legal system.

john wrote:

I believe in the death penalty for pedifiles.Mark is not guilty.Everybody, even in Louisville, knows about the Munfordville legal system.

As a survivor of sexual abuse, believe me you do remember all too well the name of your abuser. You also remember his smell, the sick feeling you get in the bottom of your stomach each time you see me. You want to blame the mother of this child???? My mother never did no about my abuse. Most victims never tell anyone and that is what these sick people count on. I would always believe a child for his or her memories, before I would ever believe anyone else. What does this young lady have to gain my accusing him? Absolutely nothing!!!!! If our legal system has something wrong with it, then I am glad they aren't right. The man upstairs knows the real truth.

What were the Busters doing to their own children? Were they being abused?

john wrote:

Mark Puckett only stayed with the Buster's for 2 months because he had no place to go at the time.It was there or on the street.His wife Jessica called cps on the Busters more than once for the way they treated their own kids.Also the accuser has changed their story 3 times.People may do stupid things when on drugs or alchol but,child molestation, come on.Mark is stronger minded than that.He has four kids of his own that love and miss him very very much.Mark also has no previous criminal record at all.The mother of this girl could have easily known Mark.Like I said, Mark was only there for a couple months until he found another place to live and his wife was with him the whole time.Honestly,how can a very young child remember the full name of a man at least 15 years later that she had baredly ever seen as a toddler.

What ever came of Mark Pucketts case?

Rara wrote:

<quoted text>What were the Busters doing to their own children? Were they being abused?

The buster men were abused as well all there lifes by ARt Hayes .it's all messed up

County crook wrote:

<quoted text>
The buster men were abused as well all there lifes by ARt Hayes .it's all messed up

you dont know this for a fact,you are only stating what you may have heard or thought,the man is dead and not able to deny these charges that you mention.all i know is that art took better care of all them boys than anybody else would or could,and they werent even his kids,only step kids,ive seen art cry like a baby when some of the boys would be in jail and he didnt have the bail money to get them out.im not saying art was an angel,he wasnt,but since he is not here to defend himself why start more rumors,i think art was a good man,and have known him for over 25yrs or more.

dutch wrote:

<quoted text>you dont know this for a fact,you are only stating what you may have heard or thought,the man is dead and not able to deny these charges that you mention.all i know is that art took better care of all them boys than anybody else would or could,and they werent even his kids,only step kids,ive seen art cry like a baby when some of the boys would be in jail and he didnt have the bail money to get them out.im not saying art was an angel,he wasnt,but since he is not here to defend himself why start more rumors,i think art was a good man,and have known him for over 25yrs or more.

Oh I liked him to I was a young boy at the pool hall in ol days and he hit on me one day and was way to touchy and made me super uncomfortable I was about 12 .but I can't prove anything about him with them but that's my understanding and maybe I took him wrong but I don't think I did and it explains alot . So srry if my comment bothered you . I won't say another word of about it

dutch wrote:

<quoted text>you dont know this for a fact,you are only stating what you may have heard or thought,the man is dead and not able to deny these charges that you mention.all i know is that art took better care of all them boys than anybody else would or could,and they werent even his kids,only step kids,ive seen art cry like a baby when some of the boys would be in jail and he didnt have the bail money to get them out.im not saying art was an angel,he wasnt,but since he is not here to defend himself why start more rumors,i think art was a good man,and have known him for over 25yrs or more.

But I also have another friend who was invited to stay there one night who claims the same kinda thing.. I won't mention his name but I have no reason to make it up .

County crook wrote:

<quoted text>
The buster men were abused as well all there lifes by ARt Hayes .it's all messed up

Unfortunately thats usually the case with most abusers. A terrible cycle passing from generation to generation. Almost like a learned behavior or second nature making it impossible for them to ever be rehabilitated. I really can't think of any other crime/criminal that could be any more dangerous than this.

Ty Lucy that was my only point I wasn't trying to upset anyone or say anything I hadn't exp first hand by ART

County crook wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I liked him to I was a young boy at the pool hall in ol days and he hit on me one day and was way to touchy and made me super uncomfortable I was about 12 .but I can't prove anything about him with them but that's my understanding and maybe I took him wrong but I don't think I did and it explains alot . So srry if my comment bothered you . I won't say another word of about it

didnet really bother me,just think that since hes gone from here and not able to speak for himself then there is no reason to say such things.thats all