Did you vote today?

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, that was an unbelievably long post of hot air!
In brief:
Harry Reid is doing the same thing to the 32 bills sitting on his desk as he is doing with his chance to bring forth a budget..........NOTHING!!! His intentional inaction made all of that copy and paste you just did completely irrelevent and a waste of time.

All copy and paste here is a waste of time. Just post the link. Either way its still a waste of time, I wanna hear what you think. Not what u read

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing, if you say it like this,
The twist bulbs actually are more dangerous because they have a LOW level of mercury.
LOW---HIGH Get it?

Or you could just say it in the context it was intended. The twist bulbs actually are more dangerous even though they have a low level of mercury which is higher than NO mercury in an incandescent bulb therefore, more damaging.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
Or you could just say it in the context it was intended. The twist bulbs actually are more dangerous even though they have a low level of mercury which is higher than NO mercury in an incandescent bulb therefore, more damaging.

"It took a "engineering class study" to tell you that a product that contains a minute amount of toxic material is "more harmful to the atmosphere" compared to a product that does not contain" Mercury.

That is just brilliant.
POST #13548

believe we had already reached that conclusion

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, that was an unbelievably long post of hot air!
In brief:
Harry Reid is doing the same thing to the 32 bills sitting on his desk as he is doing with his chance to bring forth a budget..........NOTHING!!! His intentional inaction made all of that copy and paste you just did completely irrelevent and a waste of time.

LMAO, for all you know these 32 may already be law as well.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO, for all you know these 32 may already be law as well.

They are not. Glad you think that your party not doing it's job and ignoring the Constitution is funny. Maybe that is what they mean when they say liberal democrats are out of touch. You certainly seem to fit that description.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
"It took a "engineering class study" to tell you that a product that contains a minute amount of toxic material is "more harmful to the atmosphere" compared to a product that does not contain" Mercury.
That is just brilliant.
POST #13548
believe we had already reached that conclusion

No, again you make up your own reality to fit the argument you are making. The study showed that the entire "green" movement was a scam. The study showed that "green" products were far more expensive and in some cases worse for the environment than conventional products we use now. The bulbs were just one of the things studied. I know that you don't deal well with reality that contradicts the garbage being fed to you by the liberal left agenda but I have all but quit trying to get you to see things for yourself. You continually go back to the liberal web sites that, at best, skew the truth by leaving the whole story out if not outright lie. Kinda like Harry Reid using and annonymous investor at Bain who just happened to know Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years then going out and spouting it as the truth. Those are the people feeding you the crap you regurgitate on this site and it really makes you look bad. Apparantly you are stubborn and are willing to look silly. It's your choice.

"Kinda like Harry Reid using and annonymous investor at Bain who just happened to know Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years then going out and spouting it as the truth"

LMAO, you don't read much do you, watch me make a liar OUT OF YOU AGAIN.


"He didn't pay taxes for 10 years. Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain," said Reid. "But obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?"

HARRY REID

BARNEYII wrote:

"Kinda like Harry Reid using and annonymous investor at Bain who just happened to know Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years then going out and spouting it as the truth"
LMAO, you don't read much do you, watch me make a liar OUT OF YOU AGAIN.
"He didn't pay taxes for 10 years. Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain," said Reid. "But obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?"
HARRY REID

But I thought he had released 2010 or 2011, it is just that he didn't want to release more. There was a recent uproar that he only paid 13% tax, well wouldn't that indicate that he has paid taxes. I hate hearing you defend Harry, you lose what little credibility you had.

Katydid wrote:

<quoted text>But I thought he had released 2010 or 2011, it is just that he didn't want to release more. There was a recent uproar that he only paid 13% tax, well wouldn't that indicate that he has paid taxes. I hate hearing you defend Harry, you lose what little credibility you had.

That would show he paid taxes for that year, it does not have a damn thing to do with any other years, does it?

I am not defending Harry, I am proving the statement your buddy made was a lie.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
That would show he paid taxes for that year, it does not have a damn thing to do with any other years, does it?
I am not defending Harry, I am proving the statement your buddy made was a lie.

Harry said for the last ten years, that would include the year provided. It seems that you would be more interested in the lie that Harry stated. You don't have much credibility and you may have just lost that.

Reread original post, I was wrong about last ten years, but I think if you were honest you would admit that Harry is making this up as he goes. I think Romney should provide tax returns when Obama provides college records, neither would prove anything, but it would eliminate some doubt.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
No, again you make up your own reality to fit the argument you are making. The study showed that the entire "green" movement was a scam. The study showed that "green" products were far more expensive and in some cases worse for the environment than conventional products we use now. The bulbs were just one of the things studied. I know that you don't deal well with reality that contradicts the garbage being fed to you by the liberal left agenda but I have all but quit trying to get you to see things for yourself. You continually go back to the liberal web sites that, at best, skew the truth by leaving the whole story out if not outright lie. Kinda like Harry Reid using and annonymous investor at Bain who just happened to know Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years then going out and spouting it as the truth. Those are the people feeding you the crap you regurgitate on this site and it really makes you look bad. Apparantly you are stubborn and are willing to look silly. It's your choice.

WHAT SCIENTIFIC journal or publication, published this study, can you name any, and the date of its publication?


"You continually go back to the liberal web sites"

Well, what a short memory you have, the following was posted on Thurs. Aug. 2, 2012;


Judge it!
|
#13394
Thursday Aug

"Scott Rassmusen does this for a living and he is an independent pollster unlike the "in the tank for Obama" sources you cited. Who do we believe? I know, I know, "OMG, ROFLMAO' you have a serious comprehension problem". I hope I didn't steal the diversion you were planning to use."



You are correct I am rolling on the floor laughing, let me show you why

VIA:
THE http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/rasmussen ...

Can't get any farther right than that,

QUOTE:

A new Quinnipiac/New York Times/CBS News poll, which shows President Obama handily beating Mitt Romney among likely voters in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, has sparked justifiable concern among some Republicans. In the wake of that poll, it’s worth comparing the state-by-state polling from Rasmussen Reports, whose polling is perhaps viewed with less skepticism in conservative circles.

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
WHAT SCIENTIFIC journal or publication, published this study, can you name any, and the date of its publication?
"You continually go back to the liberal web sites"
Well, what a short memory you have, the following was posted on Thurs. Aug. 2, 2012;
Judge it!
|
#13394
Thursday Aug
"Scott Rassmusen does this for a living and he is an independent pollster unlike the "in the tank for Obama" sources you cited. Who do we believe? I know, I know, "OMG, ROFLMAO' you have a serious comprehension problem". I hope I didn't steal the diversion you were planning to use."
You are correct I am rolling on the floor laughing, let me show you why
VIA:
THE http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/rasmussen ...
Can't get any farther right than that,
QUOTE:
A new Quinnipiac/New York Times/CBS News poll, which shows President Obama handily beating Mitt Romney among likely voters in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, has sparked justifiable concern among some Republicans. In the wake of that poll, it’s worth comparing the state-by-state polling from Rasmussen Reports, whose polling is perhaps viewed with less skepticism in conservative circles.

Obama has the election in the bag, it is a waste to even go vote for him, he is do far ahead and he also has all the money he needs. We just need to sit at home, draw our checks and let Obama win.

I agree

I heard from a reliable source that Harry Reid has not paid any taxes for the past thirty years. When Dirty Lying Harry reveals his source, I'll reveal mine.

Katydid wrote:

<quoted text>
Harry said for the last ten years, that would include the year provided. It seems that you would be more interested in the lie that Harry stated. You don't have much credibility and you may have just lost that.

You are a liar too, hate to be redundant, but it does seem you have a problem reading the Quote, here it is again, now please tell me where Harry said the word "LAST" IN THAT QUOTE.


“He didn’t pay taxes for 10 years! Now, do I know that that’s true? Well, I’m not certain,”



"didn't pay any taxes for 10 years" by someone who invested with Bain Capital, Romney's former private equity firm. But Reid hasn't named names, and went so far as to admit that he didn't know if his information was accurate.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/reid...

Now tell me, CREDITABILITY JUDGE, where is the word "last" ?

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a liar too, hate to be redundant, but it does seem you have a problem reading the Quote, here it is again, now please tell me where Harry said the word "LAST" IN THAT QUOTE.
“He didn’t pay taxes for 10 years! Now, do I know that that’s true? Well, I’m not certain,”
"didn't pay any taxes for 10 years" by someone who invested with Bain Capital, Romney's former private equity firm. But Reid hasn't named names, and went so far as to admit that he didn't know if his information was accurate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/reid...
Now tell me, CREDITABILITY JUDGE, where is the word "last" ?

Did you read the next post? I always admit when I am wrong, and I am always civil about it, but then I am not an insecure failure whose only joy in life is cutting and pasting on the internet. If I was, I would be called BarneyIII

BARNEYII wrote:

"Kinda like Harry Reid using and annonymous investor at Bain who just happened to know Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years then going out and spouting it as the truth"
LMAO, you don't read much do you, watch me make a liar OUT OF YOU AGAIN.
"He didn't pay taxes for 10 years. Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain," said Reid. "But obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?"
HARRY REID

You completely left out the quote “So the word’s out that he hasn’t paid any taxes for ten years. Let him prove that he has paid taxes, because he hasn’t,”. Wow, simply putting the rest of the quote completely changes the meaning of what you said Harry Reid said. You either need to do more research before you pop off or distance yourself from the lie that is the democratic party. I would suggest the latter but my guess is you won't do either and continue to look bad and lose whatever credebility you have left.

Old Army wrote:

I heard from a reliable source that Harry Reid has not paid any taxes for the past thirty years. When Dirty Lying Harry reveals his source, I'll reveal mine.

Harry also has the ability to levitate and has perfected cold fusion. I am not at liberty to divulge my sources but I have been told by a third party that they are reliable. I can't remember if it was my source or the third party that is supposedly reliable.

Katydid wrote:

Reread original post, I was wrong about last ten years, but I think if you were honest you would admit that Harry is making this up as he goes. I think Romney should provide tax returns when Obama provides college records, neither would prove anything, but it would eliminate some doubt.

I would beg to differ, tax returns can tell you a great deal.

And if he has nothing to hide, simple, release them.

For school records, name one president who has published his transcript. Do not say George Bush, those records were leaked