Van Dyke Votes Agaist Safety

Judged:

2

1

1

KG Resident wrote:

<quoted text> You will be too old to enjoy that one. This group has ruined that for ever happening. Kids are more important than water. The safety with the water issue was not important to them. They proved that. You do all your own research. We have heard the answers and do not like what we heard. If you are in it to pursue it, then you pursue it. We will pursue it at election time.

Judged:

1

1

1

Here I am wrote:

<quoted text>
Figured as much, all talk and no action when someone asks you to post your facts of a 100% funded grant you spouted off about. Just a bunch of rumors from someone just like the majority. Not one person on here can post the proof.

Judged:

1

1

1

Here I am wrote:

<quoted text>Figured as much, all talk and no action when someone asks you to post your facts of a 100% funded grant you spouted off about. Just a bunch of rumors from someone just like the majority. Not one person on here can post the proof.

Judged:

1

1

1

Apple cheeks wrote:

<quoted text> It is the buck toother sticking up for his puppet dick van dyke who voted against our children. We will fix them at election time. We have big mouths too. It does not have to be one hundred percent, and what ever it is it should be fixed NOW. The word is going out to all residents of our district that this is a political issue with you. It is one that you are not for the kids of the district, you are for putting more money in the pockets of your friends. We will get the accounts. We already know that you paid out money to the ex employees. Watch for us at the ballot box. You should talk about facts and rumors, you big bunch of moro^ns. No matter what you write, it is too late. We are passing the word to many and many more everyday. It is called grass roots.

Judged:

1

1

1

No More Pete Colarelli wrote:

<quoted text>
Pete, the pathetic little boy, Colarectum spewing his crap post after post, name after name. Where you posting at today Pete? Not spending any time with the kids, I see.

Judged:

1

1

1

Here I am wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again I'm a citizen just like you not on the city council so not scared of how you vote. I hope the majority gets replaced just like you. Everyone always thinks everything needs to be fixed right now. With out good water with good pressure it will not matter what the sidewalks look like. If the kids can't drink the water or shower but have good sidewalks what does it matter. If they make it to school on good sidewalks but it burns to the ground because of bad pressure it wiil not matter. They have sidewalks now and make it there. Yes there is a need for more but it's not as important as the water issue at hand. If it helped I would go and help do the sidewalks, but water first before the EPA drains every cent Lockport has.

2Cents2U wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you not been watching the meetings or attending. According to the majority and Robinson, all we need to do is spend $280,000 not 25mil close the 2 wells, for plenty of capacity, we don't need to fix anything else right now. So the water issues are all resolved.
Anyone else find it interesting that according to Robinson we have the capacity after closing 2 wells no problem, but yet last meeting this same majority passed the approval for more than $10,000 to go to nonother than Robinson for a well site study on where to drill a new well. How can we have the capacity to close 2 wells and be totally safe, fire protected, etc, but yet now have to do a well site study and buy land etc for another well.
Proves our point at the meetings, on the street, and on blogs like these, someone owes Robinson on the majority big time.
How much engineering does it take to close a well, lets see we have spent over 100,000 with Robinson already for what. At this rate we will be near a million in fees to Robinson before election time, yet no work is being done except studies. Oh yes, I am sure we will be paying Robinson to go to Springfield shortly to defend there plan with the attorney general along with the majority new law firm as well.
For all those that want facts these statements above are facts and have been stated by the majority not the public.
I know the next few posts will be: well Pete this and Pete that. All to deflect the issue onto others away from themselves.
We will be waiting for your same garbage from your keyboard.

Judged:

2

2

1

kelvin grove resident wrote:

<quoted text>
Copied directly from the IDOT website:
Key features of the Illinois SRTS Program include:
• Projects are funded at 100% with no local match required.
• Between 70% and 90% of funds will support infrastructure projects.
• 10% to 30% of funds will support non-infrastructure programs.
Google IDOT Safe Routes to School