Judged:
7
7
7
How is it good ???Marriage equality is good for America.
Comments (Page 6,279)
|
Judged: 7 7 7 How is it good ??? |
|
|
Judged: 6 6 6 As usual you ... C an't U nderstand N ormal T hinking |
|
|
Since: Jan 12
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
Judged: 5 5 5 Washington, Wyoming, Hawaii, New Mexico, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_t... If your state is on this list than congratulations. Your state isn't bigoted enough to write discrimination and homophobia into their state Constitution. |
|
Judged: 5 5 5 Honey, there is NOTHING normal about your thinking. You can't even tell the truth about your little inner conflict. What's the matter? Afraid Mommy will cut you off? |
|
|
Since: Jan 12
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
Judged: 5 5 5 Because everyone deserves equal rights. Also gay marriage is good for the economy. People spend a lot on gay marriages. |
|
“Facts” Since: May 08
Bucerķas, Mexico |
Judged: 7 7 7 Just wait until it is a national law banning SSM....... Coming soon...... |
|
Judged: 6 5 5 you're sounding delusional and desperate today.... more so than usual. |
|
|
Since: Jan 12
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
Judged: 7 6 6 That's not going to happen. Republicans tried to pass a constitutional ban on gay marriage at the federal level and failed TWICE. And that was in 2004 and 2006 when they CONTROLLED both the house, senate and presidency. I can't wait for a national law LEGALIZING same sex marriage however. |
|
“Facts” Since: May 08
Bucerķas, Mexico |
Judged: 7 6 6 Just a few years ago no states had laws banning gay marriage....... Liberal California banned gay marriage at the same time they voted in for medical marijuana......... The tide is turning and more and more people are tired of having the gay lifestyle forced on them...... A few years ago a civil union law would have early passed and today we are about to abolish gay marriage at the federal level.... Yes the truth does hurt...... But you brought this upon yourself.... |
|
“Facts” Since: May 08
Bucerķas, Mexico |
Judged: 6 6 6 In 2004 and 2006 you did not have 30 states that had banned gay marriage...... Today you do....... The tide has turned against you and it is rushing in fast..... |
|
“IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE” Since: Mar 11
PROP 8 AND DOMA!!! |
Judged: 6 5 5 You're welcome and yes it does.....but these folks simply won't get it!!! |
|
Judged: 6 5 5 Who's forcing you to be gay? You were born that way. It's not my problem that you can't deal with it. You're about to abolish gay marriage at the federal level? hahahahahaha ahahahahahahh ahahahahahahah ahahahahahahah Hubris! |
|
|
“IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE” Since: Mar 11
PROP 8 AND DOMA!!! |
Judged: 6 5 5 California isn't on this list.....but the fact remains that even in spite of the passage of Prop 8......18,000 Same-Sex Couples remain legally married with their California issued marriage licenses!!! |
|
“IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE” Since: Mar 11
PROP 8 AND DOMA!!! |
Judged: 6 5 5 I didn't think it was relevant to answer.....and sorry, but NOT a bigot or a liberal!!! |
|
“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE” Since: Dec 08
Location hidden |
Judged: 7 7 7 I'm trying for brevity. Thank's for noticing, my arguments are getting better. You use emotion, as your only reason, for same sex marriage. Sauce for the goose... |
|
“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE” Since: Dec 08
Location hidden |
Judged: 6 6 6 |
|
“Facts” Since: May 08
Bucerķas, Mexico |
Judged: 6 6 6 You said the same thing just two years ago when I said that more than half of the states would vote against gay marriage..........LOL Remember??? |
|
Judged: 6 6 6 Very good! I like it. Ouch. LOL |
|
|
Judged: 6 6 6 LOL! Under the creed of modern liberalism, the individual citizen is not called to maturity but is instead invited to begin a second childhood. Point proven, one more time. |
|
|
“No Headline available” Since: Jan 08
Defiance, Ohio |
Judged: 6 5 5 Well, seeing as they did not believe in land ownership, what would be the basis of the land that has been claimed, parceled, developed and sold since? Sorry, but this hypothetical fails to rise to the level of even being so much as rational. |
|
Tell me when this thread is updated: |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9 hr | 14th country | 4,023 |
|
|
17 hr | Wife of a LEO | 141 |
|
|
Thu | pnut | 1,576 |
|
|
Thu | Flordia RNC | 14,932 |
|
|
Thu | Onyekachi Nwankwo | 1 |
|
|
May 9 | asd | 69 |
|
|
May 7 | Tax needs to Drop | 6,817 |