Posted in the Cottondale Forum
Since: Jun 12
Given that the Constitution is supposed to be the "Law of the Land" and all Federal Agents, elected and appointed, of all branches of the Federal Government are required to take an oath to follow, obey, and protect the Constitution, then why isn't it a criminal offence for a federal agent to disobey the Constitution?
Regardless what today's lawyers and supposedly "elite" Supreme Court Justices may say, the Constitution is supposed to be the "Law of the Land".
Regardless what Justice Marshall wrote, the U.S. Supreme Court does not, nor have they ever had, the authority to determine the constitutionality of a law or Bill passed by the Congress. nowhere is said authority in the Constitution and there are actual words written by the Founders to the contrary. The best being,“why, given that we have established an equal seperation of powers between the President, the Congress, and the Judicial branch would we give the final deciding authority of Constitutionality to five (5) people?(Forgive me, I cannot definitively say this was Madison's or Jefferson's words from my memory).
But, given that the Constitution is completely ignored daily by the Senate, House of Representatives, the President, and the Judicial branch, what are the American People to do? From what I just stated, it means elections do not matter (have they ever), the agents that ignore the Constitution have somehow been placed "Above the Law" and the Courts will not allow an American to "petition" the Government for legal action against any "Government" individual as they are immune to actions from the citizens for any "bad" behavior - heck, Government agents get promoted for their criminal activates!
As a perfect example, why weren't 99 Senators charged with criminal activity for voting to confirm Senator Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State which was in DIRECT VIOLATION of Article VI of the Constitution which states (paraphrasing), no Senator or Representative may move to another position in the federal government if said position has had a pay increase while said the representative was in office. And this is in force until any Senator's or Representative's elected position has ended its duration. The way this is written, it would require an amendment to the Constitution to alter in any way! But, Senator Clinton was appointed Sec. of State although there had been two pay increases for said position while she was Senator and therefore she wouldn't have been eligible for the position until 2012! Since she acted as Secretary of State before 2012, then she was in violation of the law and is a criminal as are all the Senators that voted to confirm her and did not stop said confirmation!!!!!!
Tell me when this thread is updated:
|Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10)||Mon||HerpADerp||59|
|jim walters mining (Jul '12)||Jun 5||Loving it so far||14|
|Police say missing preacher went to Las Vegas (May '07)||Jun 3||Unreal||10|
|Former narcotics task force commander charged w...||Jun 1||Jaime||1|
|AL Who do you support for Public Service Commissio... (Oct '10)||May '13||Marita Owen||8|
|AL Who do you support for Governor in Alabama in 2... (Oct '10)||May '13||Obamanation||697|
|Any Pizza Hut employees in Cottondale who have ...||Mar '13||Serious Money||1|