Aunt Eva's other problem

Not long ago Metlife sent a check that was the residue to close a money market account of Eva's deceased sister. The memo attached to the check clearly indicated there was a conversation Metlife and an imposter of the deceased sister.

The residue check was mailed to an old address and thus came to the attention of other family members, who with Eva, are also beneficiaries. That discovery leads to the question as to who took possession of those earmarked funds.

As there is the real possibility of fraud and forgery we family members ask Eva's power of attorneys to clarify the issue prior to
possible Federal intervention relating to money market funds.

After Aunt Eva's power of attorney took title to Eva's home, Eva claimed she was intimidated into making the change. It may be more appropriate for Eva to say she was not so much intimidated but was duped into the self serving plans of Eva's sister and niece.

Since Eva's complaint her niece had stated Eva's property would be returned as there was no financial need to have any of Eva's property. So why has Eva's property not been returned to her after nearly a year?

Eva's niece is the matron of a highly respected Clarksville-Columbia professional family and one wonders why those family members remain silent in this affair. Have they no moral persuasion in this matter?