Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>People don't have to decide to be straight, you are born that way, it's the natural. It's the normal. You would vote for Hitler if he came out and favored gay marriage, you make me sick.

Actually, you'd be wrong......people are born either male or female, some are born Intersex......but one's sexual orientation is not the same as one's gender.

I seriously doubt anyone would vote for Hitler, even if he was for allowing Gays and Lesbians to marry.....which he wasn't and he terminated Gays and Lesbians just like he did Jewish people!!!

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>People don't have to decide to be straight, you are born that way, it's the natural. It's the normal. You would vote for Hitler if he came out and favored gay marriage, you make me sick.

And gay people are born straight too and just decide to be gay because it's a novelty, even though they're constantly horny about the opposite gender.

LOL. You people are a joke.

We've had the ability to accurately and affordably test people's $exuality in a lab setting since the 1950s. And in all that time, not one person has ever been able to show that their $exuality changed during the course of their lifetime. Not from gay to straight, not from straight to gay, not even from gay to bi$exual. Not through theraputic means and not through religious means. Also, there have been tons of studies done on homo$exuality - if it was a choice there would be precursors to that choice leading someone to want to be attracted to the same gender or leading them to actually having attraction for the same gender - yet not one study has ever found any precursor or cause.

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>No, I have never made a threat. I'm sure you have me confused with another fan of yours, you have so many. The Amazon rain forest doesn't thrive as the Mojave desert does, does it genius? I already answered that question, why the short term memory? pot? Nothing against gays, just want to keep the marriage the traditional man woman. You have a problem with that? are you a bigot or something? why do u call them "them". are u ashamed to call them gay? or homosexual or Lesbian? You act like a lot of stupid people here that this argument needs to be WON here. Do you think this topix on homosexual marriage here will make any any difference what so ever? I come here to mock how stupid you are, that's it.

Nah...it was you.

This argument in regards to gay marriage is taking place in the state who don't allow it now by alot of other people than who are in this forum. The logic is there for gays to marry.

Mocking me?? LOL!! I leave this forum for weeks at a time idiot yet you're still in here during those times.

You're really a dumbass buddy....LOL!!!

Silent Assassinat wrote:

“But this number is low,” Baldwin says,“due to the fact that many reporters will not report if a child molester is a homosexual, even if he knows that to be the case.

And why do you think that might be?

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
All you have to do if you want to see the percentage of gays who mo1est is go to a $ex offender registry like the one for the State of Texas that lists the age and gender of each mo1ester's victim(s). You can enter even a gay-friendly zip code and pull a random sample and you'll see that well over 90% are men mo1esting little girls ONLY. 2 to 3% are women molesters. 2 to 3% are men who molested both genders. 2 to 3% are men who molested males only.

OH doesn't show that much detail. The part about the age & gender.
I still don't believe these acts are about sex, but rather control and degradation and violence, just to name a few. So to keep connecting homosexuality to these acts of violence and not acknowledging this occurs with heterosexuals is misleading.

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>I guess your link did not work. Let me help you.
"Psychologist Eugene Abel, whose research found that homosexuals "sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls.…"
Abel also found that non-incarcerated "child molesters admitted from 23.4 to 281.7 acts per offender … whose targets were males."
"The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering," said Reisman, who was the principal investigator for an $800,000 Justice Department grant studying child pornography and violence. "Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls."

Even if that's true you still haven't shown that gays are any more likely to molest than straights. You're just showing that they do with greater frequency. Why? Because the straights that do are in married relationships and are quite content with molesting their own daughters...which does result in fewer victims. Guess you should be arguing for gay marriage.

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Nope, 38 states have constitutional bans on gay marriage and 47 states have bans on same sex marriage, not any number that you pull out of your smelly gay freaking sexual abused and maligned ass.

Really, 47 states have bans on Same-Sex Couples getting married.....where? in your delusional mind? Remember we only have 50 States in the Union.....and 6 already have Marriage Equality.....that right there makes your post a lie!!!

rwb wrote:

<quoted text>
OH doesn't show that much detail. The part about the age & gender.
I still don't believe these acts are about sex, but rather control and degradation and violence, just to name a few. So to keep connecting homosexuality to these acts of violence and not acknowledging this occurs with heterosexuals is misleading.

Did you even read my post?

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Wow, it is a lie, but you do not even know who those groups are. Typical gay, lie and then claim all else is a lie.

Why don't you just admit it was a lie and that's why you can't post a single source backing it up.

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Really, you are saying that there is a test to determine a person's sexuality. What is it, the butt test?
No, clueless one, it was in the 1950s that gay studies led to homosexuality being correctly classified as a mental disease.

Once again, post any study that shows being gay is a mental disease.

The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. A Michigan homosexual newspaper admits there is no such thing as "safe sex" to prevent this "soaring" cancer risk. Condoms offer only limited protection.

- Homosexual men face a significantly higher risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.

- Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS. Men who commit acts of sodomy with men have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid, extensive transmission of STDs. Control of STDs is a central component of HIV infection prevention in the United States; resurgence of bacterial STDs threatens national HIV infection prevention efforts.

RiccardoFire wrote:

The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. A Michigan homosexual newspaper admits there is no such thing as "safe sex" to prevent this "soaring" cancer risk. Condoms offer only limited protection.
- Homosexual men face a significantly higher risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.
- Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS. Men who commit acts of sodomy with men have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid, extensive transmission of STDs. Control of STDs is a central component of HIV infection prevention in the United States; resurgence of bacterial STDs threatens national HIV infection prevention efforts.

Better reason to allow day marriage, it would gay men form more stable relationships and be less promiscuous

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>They know this, but they do not want you to know this.
2010: gay men accounted for over 71% of new HIV cases in the U.S.
2010: gay men accounted for over 80% of new HIV cases in Canada

Show sources

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, I have proven just that and that you are a typical gay liar.
Yes, there are gay men and women who are in opposite sex marriages and they molest same sex children.
95% of the RCC priest molestation cases were homosexuals molesting children.
Why would any sane person argue for gays marrying same sex animals, which is what you are saying?
It is also a fact that all pedophiles are homosexuals, and none of these pedophiles ever focus on the boy's penis, but the boys butt and the girl's vagina. This is also why 70% of prisoners admit to consensual gay sex.(It is all one same shame perversion)
Psychiatrist also report that none of you freaks ever engage in exclusive perversions.

Got any links to all these "facts" idiot?

Because I'm rubberstamping everything yuo've stated above as BULLSHIT.

LOL!!!

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, it is 38 states with constitutional bans and not even a gay judge can change that.

Here's the info:

http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/wedding/f/Gay...

Question: Which States Ban Gay Marriage?

Only Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York and Washington, DC allow gay marriage, but which states have bans against gay marriage? Many states have constitutional bans on gay marriage, others have passed laws through their legislatures. Here is a listing of each state's ruling on gay marriage.

Answer: Thirty states have a constitutional ban restricting marriage to one man and one woman. Those states are:

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California (with the passage of Prop 8)
Colorado
Florida
Georgia
Kansas
Kentucky
Idaho
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Wisconsin

The following states have laws that ban gay marriage and limit marriage to one man and one woman (but it is not in their constitutions):

Arizona
Delaware
Florida
Hawaii
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maine
Maryland
Minnesota
North Carolina (amendment not in constitution yet)
Pennsylvania
Washington
West Virginia
Wyoming

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>You're a gay idiot, the issue has to do with a constitutional rights for gays to marry members of the same sex. There is none.
The issue is equal protection rights for sexual orientation under the Constitution and federal protection. There is none.
Why don't you admit that what you said was a lie. Gay Troll

Really.

Not all American citizens are due a full set of liberties and freedoms unless they pose harm?

Listen buttercup....it's not specifically written in the Constitution that you can chew Grape Bubblelicious while walking in a city park on a sunny Sundeay afternoon with your sweetie but it's covered by it.

There's no inherent harm in gays marrying jackass...therefore they should be allowed that basic liberty.

Don't agree??

Find viable harm in it Junior or shaddup.

LOL!!!

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>No, fat butt, no links to your lie, there are 38 states with constitutional bans on same sex marriage. You decided to pull your stinking gay ass out of the sewer and back into the toilet.

Oh really,how did it became 38 all of sudden but it still has to pass both Houses in order to become an federal amendment,which it couldn't pass when Bush and Republicans had both houses.

Green Fairy wrote:

<quoted text>
Better reason to allow day marriage, it would gay men form more stable relationships and be less promiscuous

Show me where gay marriage has reduced disease? being promiscuous is part of the lifestyle. Most gays are not going to get married.

Cheyenne277 wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you even read my post?

My bad...I misread what you were saying. Sorry...

Gays and Democrats are pulling all the stops to make sure Obama wins re-election so he can appoint the next justices who will do the inside job of corrupting the SCOTUS when the gay issue is finally brought to their chamber. A couple of gay judges or symphatetic (paid off) judges should do the trick.

Yes we can!