Two bars targeted in smoking ban lawsuits | The Columbus Dispatch

Judged:

3

2

2

Hayduke wrote:

The smoking ban in public places will be repealed when the casinos open....

Judged:

3

2

1

ObamaTriesHarderThanBush wrote:

<quoted text>
Why? So the 28% that smoke can chase away the 72% that do not poison the air?

Judged:

2

2

1

lang211 wrote:

Hey OTHTB if you dont like it do go to where the smoke is. still a free country til Obama takes that away too

Judged:

3

2

Smoke Free Forever wrote:

<quoted text>
How about this: Why don't you ignorant smoking trash stay the F home? Smokers are no longer socially accepted!!!

Judged:

2

1

1

Smoke Free Forever wrote:

<quoted text>
Smokers are no longer socially accepted!!!

Judged:

1

1

1

Smoke Free Forever wrote:

<quoted text>
How about this: Why don't you ignorant smoking trash stay the F home?

Judged:

2

1

1

None wrote:

<quoted text>
I certainly hope they require everyone ride bicycles to the casinos. I'd much rather be exposed to cigarette smoke than to the toxic filth that motor vehicles spew out. Would you rather be in a locked room with a running car, or with a cigarette?

Judged:

3

2

1

AntiSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
Gotta agree with you there. All the sheep bleating about how bad second hand smoke is (something that has already been proven by the W.H.O to be HIGHLY exaggerated), yet are silent when it comes to emissions controls on motor vehicles, because <gasp!> it might actually affect THEM adversely for a change. Bunch of whiny little hypocrites, had to break the law just to get their crap on the ballot. bu..bu.. but, everyone voted.... Fine, then they should have no problem getting it on the ballot again, only this time try not to BREAK THE #^@#$ LAW when you do it.

Judged:

3

3

1

Smokers stink wrote:

Cancer from second hand smoke isn't really a concern for me. It's the stench I can't stand. Even when they aren't burning one smokers still stink. The odor is on their clothes and breath, in their hair and skin. Opting to reek seems a stupid choice. Why would someone choose to smell like that?

Judged:

1

1

Smokers stink wrote:

Cancer from second hand smoke isn't really a concern for me. It's the stench I can't stand. Even when they aren't burning one smokers still stink. The odor is on their clothes and breath, in their hair and skin. Opting to reek seems a stupid choice. Why would someone choose to smell like that?

Judged:

3

2

1

u cannot own me wrote:

<quoted text>to keep the trash away

Judged:

2

1

1

Smokers stink wrote:

<quoted text>
You sound like some of the losers who complain to HR when I tell them they stink. Can't stand to hear the truth so they run and tattle. Problem is I am right and they are wrong. They do stink. HR agrees because HR is full of non-smokers. I don't hold elevator doors for people I know smoke and I don't cover phones for people out having a cancer stick on company time. Smokers stink!

Judged:

1

1

1

Sez Who wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe the choice was made a long time ago? Most of us make some bad choices along the way. Have a bit of sympathy...

Judged:

2

2

1

puff the magic dragon wrote:

<quoted text>
how about sympathy for those who have to put up with nasty smelling funky people? cigarette smoke embedded in clothes is as bad as B.O... a lot of people made bad choices "along the way" but they don't continue making those bad choices 20 to 40 times a day.