BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

<quoted text>
A lesson in logic please.
If you are responding to my post, how did I get barred?
This ought to be interesting.

Ha ha, GB thinks I am a MORON (sic) like him.

Poppo wrote:

If that’s so then the one who got the job must have proved his eligibility.

Jan. 9, 2009 -- a date no "birther"-loser even understands.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Sad that Wojar still thinks he is intelligent..
BTW, still waiting for you to show us where Wong kin Ark was ruled a natural born citizen by the SCOTUS..

Sad that AKBIRFOON thinks the judicial power of the United States is vested in the opinions of a few birfoons.

>>>>

wojar: "Both Ark and Elg were natural born citizens for the same reason: PLACE OF BIRTH. So was Julia Lynch."

Why does AKBIRFOON/Rain Man see "Ark was declared a natural born citizen by the USSC" in the quote above?

Because he's hallucinating again.

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Sad that AKBIRFOON thinks the judicial power of the United States is vested in a few birfoons.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

akpilot wrote:

This is why case law, which is sold as Constitutional law, will eventually render the Constitution meaningless.

Art. III, Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;-- between a State and Citizens of another State,--between Citizens of different States,--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."
==========
Since this great nation was founded on the nearly six centuries of Anglo-American jurisprudence, the Founders KNEW and PROVIDED for judicial construction. You must think the Founders were idiots - yet everyone of them was better educated than you.

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm certain that John has received a double secret email claiming that Obama spent BILLIONS just not attending the GA non-hearing ...(because iT was a landmark case)

Of course it was a landmark case. World Nut claimed it set precedents!

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
John wants to see immunization records and wonders why Obama’s BC doesn’t look the same as everyone else who ordered a BC from the HDoH in April of 2011(it does). And of course he’s spending a fortune hiding things it doesn’t cost John a dime to keep private.

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Well I do not want Laissez Faire economics and more than I do Obamanomics.
It was the Laissez Faire economics under Calvin Coolidge was a major factor in a over heated economy (Roaring Twenties) which "started" what would become the Great Depression.
Left on it's own that Depression probably would have been over by 1931-32 but first Herbert Hoover and then FDR turned that depression into the Great Depression by increasing taxes and tariffs under Hoover and then extending the Progressive Agenda under FDR.
There needs to be a moderating force in stabilizing the economy to prevent depressions while still allowing recessions that have a cleansing effect on weak and unprofitable companies.
I say "no" to both Laissez Faire as well as Progressive (Keynesian) Ecomonics.

Does Schumpeter agree with your analysis. Please do not admit to being really stupid and uneducated by saying you don't know Schumpeter's work.
==========
BTW, tell the Class any element of the Keynesian model that would be considered to be "progressive."

Marcus Garvey wrote:

Court ordered inactive.

Is it possible that you could expose yourself any more as being really stupid and uneducated?
==========
Rule 770.
Voluntary Transfer to Inactive Status
“Any attorney may file with the clerk of the Supreme Court a motion that he be transferred to inactive status. Within 21 days thereafter, the Administrator shall:
1. file with the clerk of the Supreme Court his consent to the entry of an Order allowing such motion; or
2. file with the clerk of the Supreme Court his objection to the allowance of such motion.
No motion for transfer to inactive status may be granted EXCEPT by Order of the Supreme Court and, then, only when no disciplinary charges are pending or about to be brought against the attorney.
==========
Tell the Class how any attorney in Illinois can become inactive WITHOUT the Order of the Supreme Court.
If you can't answer that question, you prove conclusively that you are more stupid than grandiose "birther"-loser. Ha, Ha, Ha.

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

Eligibility was not proven in 2008, and can't be proven in 2012.

Why do you show such disrespect for and ignorance of the Constitution?
Jan. 9, 2009 -- strictly in accord with every provision of the United States Constitution. ABSOLUTE PROOF WITH IRREBUTTABLE LEGAL FINALITY.

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all I said that SOME liberals claim that the Great Depression ended in 1933.

Who are those liberals? Name one and quote him or her.

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

<quoted text>
What witness testified for Obama???
What did the Court hear or see from Obama???
Are you really this STUPID???
Why can't you name just ONE independent document expert that says Obama's long form birth certificate is authentic?
Your bullshit post didn't answer the question that was asked.

Now you say Obama won because he didn't show up, had no witnesses and didn't defend himseld. Yet, he won. Taitz was so poor a jurist that she lost to not just nobody, but TO A CHAIR. Johannes is right, Obama didn't technically win, she lost. She had sfa. Now, can you explain the stupidity of what you just wrote up there?

AmericanLady wrote:

<quoted text>Me too GB ;-)

Ha ha, the monologue

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I could, but I will wait until O'Bummer releases his real Birther Certificate.

Still waiting for the "real" Hawaii DOH to declare he was born in Hawaii?

Old Goat wrote:

didn't work did it!

Are you referring to Chet Arthur?

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:

<quoted text>
What witness testified for Obama???
What did the Court hear or see from Obama???
Are you really this STUPID???
Why can't you name just ONE independent document expert that says Obama's long form birth certificate is authentic?
At least 2 experts claimed in open court that the document was fraudulent.
The judge chose to ignore them, because to recognize them would have been inconsistent with the decision he was about to make as Obama's Attorney.
Now who testified that it was an authentic document???
Your bullshit post didn't answer the question that was asked.

Let me ask you this. If there are so many experts who believe the document is not authentic, why were they not testifying at Judge Malihi's hearing? Is your Cossack white Russian er hmmm lawyer Taitz so inept that she forgot to call at least ONE expert to testify? One should've done the trick, no?

AmericanLady wrote:

I put EVERYTHING you NEED to SEE that he is NOT eligible on here.
YOU do NOT have to CITE the Constitution.....IT's THERE in BLACK and WHITE to READ..........SIC]

That's her/his way of saying s/he has nothing that would hold up in court.

Obama Gonna Lose wrote:
<quoted text>
What witness testified for Obama???
What did the Court hear or see from Obama???
Are you really this STUPID???
Why can't you name just ONE independent document expert that says Obama's long form birth certificate is authentic?
At least 2 experts claimed in open court that the document was fraudulent.
The judge chose to ignore them, because to recognize them would have been inconsistent with the decision he was about to make as Obama's Attorney.
Now who testified that it was an authentic document???
Your bullshit post didn't answer the question that was asked.

You'd think, after 97 attempts, they'd have their act together.

TruthHere wrote:

Obama will be on the Georgia ballot November 2012 despite all the post from Anti-American Lady. hahahhahahhahahqhahhahahahahha haha!!!!!!!!!!

OBAMA WON'T BE on any ballot in November. But he might be on the 2014 half-dollar.
www.WND.com

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
John wants to see immunization records and wonders why Obama’s BC doesn’t look the same as everyone else who ordered a BC from the HDoH in April of 2011(it does). And of course he’s spending a fortune hiding things it doesn’t cost John a dime to keep private.

I would gladly show all this information should my citizenship be questioned. I could easily remove all doubt. Medical records and medical bills can be tracked from time of birth. Instead of spending millions hiding I would have an attorney track everything down and I could present it.

The most powerful man in the world cannot show his long for birth certificate. Wow, he doesn't have the authority to make a hospital show the original. Would you like to make a $1000 bet that I can get a copy of mine that shows that state seal. Would be hard to get as I already have it in the safe.

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
Anyone who cannot use basic punctuation correctly is not eligible to post on this thread.

That would eliminate all the birthers and Tea partyers. Pity, Terri, who will make us laugh?

On the radio this afternoon, heard an extract of a speech at a NY Tea party convention. Speaker bellowed that when Obama was sworn in, unemployment stood at 7.6% True, who can deny it? But what the speaker did not say to the assembled throng of clueless delegates was that the unemployment rate had gone from 4.5% in JANuary 2008 to 7.6% 12 months later, almost double, and in rapid ascendance, not stoppable in a couple of months. I thought only the birther and tea party contributors to Topix believed such Goebbels-like fabrications. Apparently not, the live ones are just as clueless.

Oh, okay , I get it. Birther-tea partyers don't want to know about the close-to-double augmentation of 4.5 to 7.6% in 12 months. They only want to know about the 7.6%. Selective info for selective birther/tea partyers.

Marcus Garvey wrote:

<quoted text>Tell the class what sleazy deal Michelle and Obama participated in to can their licenses. Probably graft and corruption or comingling of funds.

Nah, again you have them mixed up with the Bush family who made a fortune off their governmental connections.