|
buzz
Belleville, IL
|
Ginny M wrote: <quoted text> He is hardly mentioned-I forgot that there was a son. Isn't he the one who heard a car start up in front of the house right after the shootings?
|
|
Lora-Freedom 4 MW
Kansas City, KS
|
buzz wrote: <quoted text>Isn't he the one who heard a car start up in front of the house right after the shootings? Yes that is what I read also, but he was so young that they quickly were able to dismiss that remark. But I do beleive he heard a car start up, I am thinking is what a blazer dark colored. I even beleive that Brandon had one at that time. I also read that somewhere along with Brandon having a .22 gun and then there is the gun residue positive testing, and then the friend of his trunk where he threw a bag and she saw .22 shells in her trunk... But all that didn't happen?
|
|
Dale
Chillicothe, MO
|
Yes, he is the only son, and he did hear a vehicle start up and leave. The reason I know this is I watched a video that they took while Scott was under hypnosis. He says he hears a car and hears it leave.
|
|
OTS
Kansas City, KS
|
Why didn't Jackie check on her children the night of the murders?
|
|
RTC
Saint Louis, MO
|
OTS wrote: Why didn't Jackie check on her children the night of the murders? What difference does this possibly make?
|
|
My thoughts
Elmhurst, IL
|
OTS wrote: Why didn't Jackie check on her children the night of the murders? Because everyone including the Robertsons thought it was Brandon (even Lyndell). Brandon wasn't a threat to Woodworths but he had threatened the Robertsons
|
|
OTS
Kansas City, KS
|
Why didn't Jackie check on her kids?
|
|
OTS
Kansas City, KS
|
RTC wrote: <quoted text> What difference does this possibly make? This is the most important question in the case because you can't have it both ways. Think about it.
|
|
|
|
LORA-FREE MW
Kansas City, KS
|
OTS wrote: <quoted text> This is the most important question in the case because you can't have it both ways. Think about it. This is the most important question of the case. OMG! it is not!!! The most important questions is "Brandon Thomure" is the most important question....
|
|
Since: Sep 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
LORA-FREE MW wrote: <quoted text> This is the most important question of the case. OMG! it is not!!! The most important questions is "Brandon Thomure" is the most important question.... Ramsey needs to find eleven other people just like you Lora. I always wondered how they found the 12 people they did in the OJ trial. I have a bridge for sale. Would you like to buy it?
|
|
audpaud
Union, MO
|
This whole "Jackie checking on her kids" assertion is not only laughable here on a Topix forum, but more importantly, irrelevant in a court of law. A better question is why BT was present at the funeral of the woman he had threatened to kill?
|
|
Mother
Chillicothe, MO
|
The very first thing I would have done is check on my own children. Something doesn't add up. Whether or not it is relevant in the court of law doesn't seem to matter much on this site. There are a lot of things that don't mean a thing posted here. This however gives me pause.
|
|
mo
Elmhurst, IL
|
Mother wrote: The very first thing I would have done is check on my own children. Something doesn't add up. Whether or not it is relevant in the court of law doesn't seem to matter much on this site. There are a lot of things that don't mean a thing posted here. This however gives me pause. You can't say exactly what you would do because you haven't been in that situation before. In my eyes Jackie was reacting to help neighbor/friends in need. And you are right had it been a random murderer on the loose then Jackie might have had to deal with the consequences of leaving her own house to help others, but that wasnt the case. i can't understand how a women going to help others in a tragedy can be judged on the steps she took to help!! I personally have no idea what I would do in an emergency situation because hindsight is always 20/20! You know... Had you called her and told her the day of the shooting that if she would have delayed her response of helping to check on all of her kids, who btw were sleeping, then mark would have never been able to be convicted then I am sure she would have appreciated that information but who can plan for that??
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|